Distractor devaluation in a flanker task: Object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory

Torsten Martiny-Huenger, Peter M. Gollwitzer, Gabriele Oettingen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous research has shown that ignored stimuli are affectively devalued (i.e., distractor devaluation effect). Whereas previous research used feature-based selection tasks to investigate distractor devaluation, we used an object-based paradigm, allowing us to investigate open questions regarding underlying mechanisms. First, by using an object-based paradigm, we expected to find distractor devaluation for specific distractors (in contrast to general effects for certain categories). Second, we expected distractor devaluation in the absence of explicit recall of the to-be-evaluated stimulus' prior status (e.g., distractor), which is an important and previously untested factor, in order to exclude alternative explanations for distractor devaluation. Third, derived from the devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis, we predicted that conditions of stronger distractor interference would result in stronger distractor devaluation. These predictions were confirmed in two experiments. We thus provide evidence that distractor devaluation can be a consequence of selective attention processes and that the evaluative consequences of ignoring can be tied to the mental representation of specific distractors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)613-625
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Research
Recognition (Psychology)
Recognition Memory
Distractor
Inhibition (Psychology)
Paradigm
Stimulus

Keywords

  • Distractor devaluation
  • Evaluation
  • Interference
  • Selective attention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{91d3563e4b9542ada5ed80554da70c1a,
title = "Distractor devaluation in a flanker task: Object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory",
abstract = "Previous research has shown that ignored stimuli are affectively devalued (i.e., distractor devaluation effect). Whereas previous research used feature-based selection tasks to investigate distractor devaluation, we used an object-based paradigm, allowing us to investigate open questions regarding underlying mechanisms. First, by using an object-based paradigm, we expected to find distractor devaluation for specific distractors (in contrast to general effects for certain categories). Second, we expected distractor devaluation in the absence of explicit recall of the to-be-evaluated stimulus' prior status (e.g., distractor), which is an important and previously untested factor, in order to exclude alternative explanations for distractor devaluation. Third, derived from the devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis, we predicted that conditions of stronger distractor interference would result in stronger distractor devaluation. These predictions were confirmed in two experiments. We thus provide evidence that distractor devaluation can be a consequence of selective attention processes and that the evaluative consequences of ignoring can be tied to the mental representation of specific distractors.",
keywords = "Distractor devaluation, Evaluation, Interference, Selective attention",
author = "Torsten Martiny-Huenger and Gollwitzer, {Peter M.} and Gabriele Oettingen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1037/a0034130",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "613--625",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distractor devaluation in a flanker task

T2 - Object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory

AU - Martiny-Huenger, Torsten

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Previous research has shown that ignored stimuli are affectively devalued (i.e., distractor devaluation effect). Whereas previous research used feature-based selection tasks to investigate distractor devaluation, we used an object-based paradigm, allowing us to investigate open questions regarding underlying mechanisms. First, by using an object-based paradigm, we expected to find distractor devaluation for specific distractors (in contrast to general effects for certain categories). Second, we expected distractor devaluation in the absence of explicit recall of the to-be-evaluated stimulus' prior status (e.g., distractor), which is an important and previously untested factor, in order to exclude alternative explanations for distractor devaluation. Third, derived from the devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis, we predicted that conditions of stronger distractor interference would result in stronger distractor devaluation. These predictions were confirmed in two experiments. We thus provide evidence that distractor devaluation can be a consequence of selective attention processes and that the evaluative consequences of ignoring can be tied to the mental representation of specific distractors.

AB - Previous research has shown that ignored stimuli are affectively devalued (i.e., distractor devaluation effect). Whereas previous research used feature-based selection tasks to investigate distractor devaluation, we used an object-based paradigm, allowing us to investigate open questions regarding underlying mechanisms. First, by using an object-based paradigm, we expected to find distractor devaluation for specific distractors (in contrast to general effects for certain categories). Second, we expected distractor devaluation in the absence of explicit recall of the to-be-evaluated stimulus' prior status (e.g., distractor), which is an important and previously untested factor, in order to exclude alternative explanations for distractor devaluation. Third, derived from the devaluation-by-inhibition hypothesis, we predicted that conditions of stronger distractor interference would result in stronger distractor devaluation. These predictions were confirmed in two experiments. We thus provide evidence that distractor devaluation can be a consequence of selective attention processes and that the evaluative consequences of ignoring can be tied to the mental representation of specific distractors.

KW - Distractor devaluation

KW - Evaluation

KW - Interference

KW - Selective attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897952970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897952970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0034130

DO - 10.1037/a0034130

M3 - Article

C2 - 24016067

AN - SCOPUS:84897952970

VL - 40

SP - 613

EP - 625

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 2

ER -