Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms

Daryl Fougnie, René Marois

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A hallmark of both visual attention and working memory is their severe capacity limit: People can attentively track only about four objects in a multiple object tracking (MOT) task and can hold only up to four objects in visual working memory (VWM). It has been proposed that attention underlies the capacity limit of VWM. We tested this hypothesis by determining the effect of varying the load of a MOT task performed during the retention interval of a VWM task and comparing the resulting dual-task costs with those observed when a VWM task was performed concurrently with another VWM task or with a verbal working memory task. Instead of supporting the view that the capacity limit of VWM is solely attention based, the results indicate that VWM capacity is set by the interaction of visuospatial attentional, central amodal, and local task-specific sources of processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)526-534
Number of pages9
JournalPsychological Science
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory : Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms. / Fougnie, Daryl; Marois, René.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 17, No. 6, 01.06.2006, p. 526-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9994e6945cfb40319bb065849a31a458,
title = "Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms",
abstract = "A hallmark of both visual attention and working memory is their severe capacity limit: People can attentively track only about four objects in a multiple object tracking (MOT) task and can hold only up to four objects in visual working memory (VWM). It has been proposed that attention underlies the capacity limit of VWM. We tested this hypothesis by determining the effect of varying the load of a MOT task performed during the retention interval of a VWM task and comparing the resulting dual-task costs with those observed when a VWM task was performed concurrently with another VWM task or with a verbal working memory task. Instead of supporting the view that the capacity limit of VWM is solely attention based, the results indicate that VWM capacity is set by the interaction of visuospatial attentional, central amodal, and local task-specific sources of processing.",
author = "Daryl Fougnie and Ren{\'e} Marois",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01739.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "526--534",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory

T2 - Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms

AU - Fougnie, Daryl

AU - Marois, René

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - A hallmark of both visual attention and working memory is their severe capacity limit: People can attentively track only about four objects in a multiple object tracking (MOT) task and can hold only up to four objects in visual working memory (VWM). It has been proposed that attention underlies the capacity limit of VWM. We tested this hypothesis by determining the effect of varying the load of a MOT task performed during the retention interval of a VWM task and comparing the resulting dual-task costs with those observed when a VWM task was performed concurrently with another VWM task or with a verbal working memory task. Instead of supporting the view that the capacity limit of VWM is solely attention based, the results indicate that VWM capacity is set by the interaction of visuospatial attentional, central amodal, and local task-specific sources of processing.

AB - A hallmark of both visual attention and working memory is their severe capacity limit: People can attentively track only about four objects in a multiple object tracking (MOT) task and can hold only up to four objects in visual working memory (VWM). It has been proposed that attention underlies the capacity limit of VWM. We tested this hypothesis by determining the effect of varying the load of a MOT task performed during the retention interval of a VWM task and comparing the resulting dual-task costs with those observed when a VWM task was performed concurrently with another VWM task or with a verbal working memory task. Instead of supporting the view that the capacity limit of VWM is solely attention based, the results indicate that VWM capacity is set by the interaction of visuospatial attentional, central amodal, and local task-specific sources of processing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744962651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744962651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01739.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01739.x

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 526

EP - 534

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 6

ER -