Dissociable neural mechanisms for goal-directed versus incidental memory reactivation

Brice A. Kuhl, Marcia K. Johnson, Marvin M. Chun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Remembering a past event involves reactivation of distributed patterns of neural activity that represent the features of that event-a process that depends on associative mechanisms supported by medial temporal lobe structures. Although efficient use of memory requires prioritizing those features of a memory that are relevant to current behavioral goals (target features) over features that may be goal-irrelevant (incidental features), there remains ambiguity concerning how this is achieved. We tested the hypothesis that although medial temporal lobe structures may support reactivation of both target and incidental event features, frontoparietal cortex preferentially reactivates those features that match current goals. Here, human participants were cued to remember either the category (face/ scene) to which a picture belonged (category trials) or the location (left/right) in which a picture appeared (location trials). Multivoxel pattern analysis of fMRI data were used to measure reactivation of category information as a function of its behavioral relevance (target vs incidental reactivation). In ventral/medial temporal lobe (VMTL) structures, incidental reactivation was as robust as target reactivation. In contrast, frontoparietal cortex exhibited stronger target than incidental reactivation; that is, goal-modulated reactivation. Reactivation was also associated with later memory. Frontoparietal biases toward target reactivation predicted subsequent memory for target features, whereas incidental reactivation in VMTL predicted subsequent memory for nontested features. These findings reveal a striking dissociation between goal-modulated reactivation in frontoparietal cortex and incidental reactivation in VMTL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16099-16109
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume33
Issue number41
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Temporal Lobe
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Dissociable neural mechanisms for goal-directed versus incidental memory reactivation. / Kuhl, Brice A.; Johnson, Marcia K.; Chun, Marvin M.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 33, No. 41, 2013, p. 16099-16109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuhl, Brice A. ; Johnson, Marcia K. ; Chun, Marvin M. / Dissociable neural mechanisms for goal-directed versus incidental memory reactivation. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 41. pp. 16099-16109.
@article{de83d6afdf754be08664d58522d01324,
title = "Dissociable neural mechanisms for goal-directed versus incidental memory reactivation",
abstract = "Remembering a past event involves reactivation of distributed patterns of neural activity that represent the features of that event-a process that depends on associative mechanisms supported by medial temporal lobe structures. Although efficient use of memory requires prioritizing those features of a memory that are relevant to current behavioral goals (target features) over features that may be goal-irrelevant (incidental features), there remains ambiguity concerning how this is achieved. We tested the hypothesis that although medial temporal lobe structures may support reactivation of both target and incidental event features, frontoparietal cortex preferentially reactivates those features that match current goals. Here, human participants were cued to remember either the category (face/ scene) to which a picture belonged (category trials) or the location (left/right) in which a picture appeared (location trials). Multivoxel pattern analysis of fMRI data were used to measure reactivation of category information as a function of its behavioral relevance (target vs incidental reactivation). In ventral/medial temporal lobe (VMTL) structures, incidental reactivation was as robust as target reactivation. In contrast, frontoparietal cortex exhibited stronger target than incidental reactivation; that is, goal-modulated reactivation. Reactivation was also associated with later memory. Frontoparietal biases toward target reactivation predicted subsequent memory for target features, whereas incidental reactivation in VMTL predicted subsequent memory for nontested features. These findings reveal a striking dissociation between goal-modulated reactivation in frontoparietal cortex and incidental reactivation in VMTL.",
author = "Kuhl, {Brice A.} and Johnson, {Marcia K.} and Chun, {Marvin M.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0207-13.2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "16099--16109",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "41",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dissociable neural mechanisms for goal-directed versus incidental memory reactivation

AU - Kuhl, Brice A.

AU - Johnson, Marcia K.

AU - Chun, Marvin M.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Remembering a past event involves reactivation of distributed patterns of neural activity that represent the features of that event-a process that depends on associative mechanisms supported by medial temporal lobe structures. Although efficient use of memory requires prioritizing those features of a memory that are relevant to current behavioral goals (target features) over features that may be goal-irrelevant (incidental features), there remains ambiguity concerning how this is achieved. We tested the hypothesis that although medial temporal lobe structures may support reactivation of both target and incidental event features, frontoparietal cortex preferentially reactivates those features that match current goals. Here, human participants were cued to remember either the category (face/ scene) to which a picture belonged (category trials) or the location (left/right) in which a picture appeared (location trials). Multivoxel pattern analysis of fMRI data were used to measure reactivation of category information as a function of its behavioral relevance (target vs incidental reactivation). In ventral/medial temporal lobe (VMTL) structures, incidental reactivation was as robust as target reactivation. In contrast, frontoparietal cortex exhibited stronger target than incidental reactivation; that is, goal-modulated reactivation. Reactivation was also associated with later memory. Frontoparietal biases toward target reactivation predicted subsequent memory for target features, whereas incidental reactivation in VMTL predicted subsequent memory for nontested features. These findings reveal a striking dissociation between goal-modulated reactivation in frontoparietal cortex and incidental reactivation in VMTL.

AB - Remembering a past event involves reactivation of distributed patterns of neural activity that represent the features of that event-a process that depends on associative mechanisms supported by medial temporal lobe structures. Although efficient use of memory requires prioritizing those features of a memory that are relevant to current behavioral goals (target features) over features that may be goal-irrelevant (incidental features), there remains ambiguity concerning how this is achieved. We tested the hypothesis that although medial temporal lobe structures may support reactivation of both target and incidental event features, frontoparietal cortex preferentially reactivates those features that match current goals. Here, human participants were cued to remember either the category (face/ scene) to which a picture belonged (category trials) or the location (left/right) in which a picture appeared (location trials). Multivoxel pattern analysis of fMRI data were used to measure reactivation of category information as a function of its behavioral relevance (target vs incidental reactivation). In ventral/medial temporal lobe (VMTL) structures, incidental reactivation was as robust as target reactivation. In contrast, frontoparietal cortex exhibited stronger target than incidental reactivation; that is, goal-modulated reactivation. Reactivation was also associated with later memory. Frontoparietal biases toward target reactivation predicted subsequent memory for target features, whereas incidental reactivation in VMTL predicted subsequent memory for nontested features. These findings reveal a striking dissociation between goal-modulated reactivation in frontoparietal cortex and incidental reactivation in VMTL.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885130000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885130000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0207-13.2013

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0207-13.2013

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 16099

EP - 16109

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 41

ER -