Disentangling the Effects of Race and Place in Economic Transactions

Findings from an Online Field Experiment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Scholarship on discrimination consistently shows that non-Whites are at a disadvantage in obtaining goods and services relative to Whites. To a lesser extent, recent work has asked whether or not place of residence may also affect individuals’ chances in economic markets. In this study, we use a field experiment in an online market for second-hand goods to examine transactional opportunities for White, Black, Asian, and Latino residents of both advantaged and disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our results show that sellers prefer transactional partners who live in advantaged neighborhoods to those who live in neighborhoods that are majority non-White and have higher rates of poverty. This was true across all four racial/ethnic groups, revealing that neighborhood stigma exists independently of racial stigma. We discuss the implications for scholarship on neighborhood effects and we outline how future research using experiments can leverage various types of markets to better specify when characteristics like race trigger discrimination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCity and Community
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

transaction
experiment
economics
market
discrimination
type of market
place of residence
ethnic group
poverty
field experiment
effect
resident

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urban Studies

Cite this

@article{a452be2dc4944624bcaae90987996295,
title = "Disentangling the Effects of Race and Place in Economic Transactions: Findings from an Online Field Experiment",
abstract = "Scholarship on discrimination consistently shows that non-Whites are at a disadvantage in obtaining goods and services relative to Whites. To a lesser extent, recent work has asked whether or not place of residence may also affect individuals’ chances in economic markets. In this study, we use a field experiment in an online market for second-hand goods to examine transactional opportunities for White, Black, Asian, and Latino residents of both advantaged and disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our results show that sellers prefer transactional partners who live in advantaged neighborhoods to those who live in neighborhoods that are majority non-White and have higher rates of poverty. This was true across all four racial/ethnic groups, revealing that neighborhood stigma exists independently of racial stigma. We discuss the implications for scholarship on neighborhood effects and we outline how future research using experiments can leverage various types of markets to better specify when characteristics like race trigger discrimination.",
author = "Max Besbris and Jacob Faber and Patrick Sharkey",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cico.12394",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "City and Community",
issn = "1535-6841",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling the Effects of Race and Place in Economic Transactions

T2 - Findings from an Online Field Experiment

AU - Besbris, Max

AU - Faber, Jacob

AU - Sharkey, Patrick

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Scholarship on discrimination consistently shows that non-Whites are at a disadvantage in obtaining goods and services relative to Whites. To a lesser extent, recent work has asked whether or not place of residence may also affect individuals’ chances in economic markets. In this study, we use a field experiment in an online market for second-hand goods to examine transactional opportunities for White, Black, Asian, and Latino residents of both advantaged and disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our results show that sellers prefer transactional partners who live in advantaged neighborhoods to those who live in neighborhoods that are majority non-White and have higher rates of poverty. This was true across all four racial/ethnic groups, revealing that neighborhood stigma exists independently of racial stigma. We discuss the implications for scholarship on neighborhood effects and we outline how future research using experiments can leverage various types of markets to better specify when characteristics like race trigger discrimination.

AB - Scholarship on discrimination consistently shows that non-Whites are at a disadvantage in obtaining goods and services relative to Whites. To a lesser extent, recent work has asked whether or not place of residence may also affect individuals’ chances in economic markets. In this study, we use a field experiment in an online market for second-hand goods to examine transactional opportunities for White, Black, Asian, and Latino residents of both advantaged and disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our results show that sellers prefer transactional partners who live in advantaged neighborhoods to those who live in neighborhoods that are majority non-White and have higher rates of poverty. This was true across all four racial/ethnic groups, revealing that neighborhood stigma exists independently of racial stigma. We discuss the implications for scholarship on neighborhood effects and we outline how future research using experiments can leverage various types of markets to better specify when characteristics like race trigger discrimination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066095695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066095695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cico.12394

DO - 10.1111/cico.12394

M3 - Article

JO - City and Community

JF - City and Community

SN - 1535-6841

ER -