Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions

Madeline Heilman, Brian Welle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This research examined how efforts to ensure demographic diversity in a work group affected perceptions of the competence of individuals who are likely targets of such efforts. In three experiments, 262 undergraduates gave their impressions and performance expectations of members of a group assembled to work on a task. When a diversity rationale rather than a merit rationale was provided for how the work group was assembled, both women (Studies 1 and 2) and Black men (Study 3) were perceived as less competent and were expected to be less influential. This effect occurred regardless of the proportional representation of women or the degree of the groups' heterogeneity. The diversity rationale also produced more negative characterizations than did another non-merit-based rationale: scheduling convenience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1291-1319
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Mental Competency
Demography
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions. / Heilman, Madeline; Welle, Brian.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 36, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 1291-1319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1165b13f2c324053ab6cf0a1d2804113,
title = "Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions",
abstract = "This research examined how efforts to ensure demographic diversity in a work group affected perceptions of the competence of individuals who are likely targets of such efforts. In three experiments, 262 undergraduates gave their impressions and performance expectations of members of a group assembled to work on a task. When a diversity rationale rather than a merit rationale was provided for how the work group was assembled, both women (Studies 1 and 2) and Black men (Study 3) were perceived as less competent and were expected to be less influential. This effect occurred regardless of the proportional representation of women or the degree of the groups' heterogeneity. The diversity rationale also produced more negative characterizations than did another non-merit-based rationale: scheduling convenience.",
author = "Madeline Heilman and Brian Welle",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00043.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1291--1319",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions

AU - Heilman, Madeline

AU - Welle, Brian

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - This research examined how efforts to ensure demographic diversity in a work group affected perceptions of the competence of individuals who are likely targets of such efforts. In three experiments, 262 undergraduates gave their impressions and performance expectations of members of a group assembled to work on a task. When a diversity rationale rather than a merit rationale was provided for how the work group was assembled, both women (Studies 1 and 2) and Black men (Study 3) were perceived as less competent and were expected to be less influential. This effect occurred regardless of the proportional representation of women or the degree of the groups' heterogeneity. The diversity rationale also produced more negative characterizations than did another non-merit-based rationale: scheduling convenience.

AB - This research examined how efforts to ensure demographic diversity in a work group affected perceptions of the competence of individuals who are likely targets of such efforts. In three experiments, 262 undergraduates gave their impressions and performance expectations of members of a group assembled to work on a task. When a diversity rationale rather than a merit rationale was provided for how the work group was assembled, both women (Studies 1 and 2) and Black men (Study 3) were perceived as less competent and were expected to be less influential. This effect occurred regardless of the proportional representation of women or the degree of the groups' heterogeneity. The diversity rationale also produced more negative characterizations than did another non-merit-based rationale: scheduling convenience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645705929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645705929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00043.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00043.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645705929

VL - 36

SP - 1291

EP - 1319

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 5

ER -