Directions and issues in psychosocial research and methods as applied to cleft lip and palate and craniofacial anomalies

R. P. Strauss, Hillary Broder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Psychosocial research into cleft lip and/or palate and craniofacial conditions has historically employed a 'medical model' of research that sought to clarify whether patients experienced psychopathology as a consequence of the birth defect. In recent years, this paradigm has been replaced by a 'social science model' of research that posits that most individuals with clefts do not manifest psychological pathology. The 'social science model' examines adjustment and adaptation in the patients and their families. Research questions may consider the social, cultural, and psychological ramifications of being different in terms of speech, appearance, or identity. The authors suggest that an expanded set of research questions be considered, and that researchers from sociology, anthropology, ethics, economics, health services research, as well as psychology, become engaged. This paper proposes a range of possible research topics and indicates likely trends in research design and methodology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-156
Number of pages7
JournalCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Volume28
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Cleft Lip
Cleft Palate
Research
Social Sciences
Research Design
Psychology
Behavioral Medicine
Social Adjustment
Anthropology
Sociology
Health Services Research
Psychopathology
Ethics
Biomedical Research
Economics
Research Personnel
Direction compound
Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{61c7c9adfaca468f9bae48887230939d,
title = "Directions and issues in psychosocial research and methods as applied to cleft lip and palate and craniofacial anomalies",
abstract = "Psychosocial research into cleft lip and/or palate and craniofacial conditions has historically employed a 'medical model' of research that sought to clarify whether patients experienced psychopathology as a consequence of the birth defect. In recent years, this paradigm has been replaced by a 'social science model' of research that posits that most individuals with clefts do not manifest psychological pathology. The 'social science model' examines adjustment and adaptation in the patients and their families. Research questions may consider the social, cultural, and psychological ramifications of being different in terms of speech, appearance, or identity. The authors suggest that an expanded set of research questions be considered, and that researchers from sociology, anthropology, ethics, economics, health services research, as well as psychology, become engaged. This paper proposes a range of possible research topics and indicates likely trends in research design and methodology.",
author = "Strauss, {R. P.} and Hillary Broder",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "150--156",
journal = "Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal",
issn = "1055-6656",
publisher = "American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Directions and issues in psychosocial research and methods as applied to cleft lip and palate and craniofacial anomalies

AU - Strauss, R. P.

AU - Broder, Hillary

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Psychosocial research into cleft lip and/or palate and craniofacial conditions has historically employed a 'medical model' of research that sought to clarify whether patients experienced psychopathology as a consequence of the birth defect. In recent years, this paradigm has been replaced by a 'social science model' of research that posits that most individuals with clefts do not manifest psychological pathology. The 'social science model' examines adjustment and adaptation in the patients and their families. Research questions may consider the social, cultural, and psychological ramifications of being different in terms of speech, appearance, or identity. The authors suggest that an expanded set of research questions be considered, and that researchers from sociology, anthropology, ethics, economics, health services research, as well as psychology, become engaged. This paper proposes a range of possible research topics and indicates likely trends in research design and methodology.

AB - Psychosocial research into cleft lip and/or palate and craniofacial conditions has historically employed a 'medical model' of research that sought to clarify whether patients experienced psychopathology as a consequence of the birth defect. In recent years, this paradigm has been replaced by a 'social science model' of research that posits that most individuals with clefts do not manifest psychological pathology. The 'social science model' examines adjustment and adaptation in the patients and their families. Research questions may consider the social, cultural, and psychological ramifications of being different in terms of speech, appearance, or identity. The authors suggest that an expanded set of research questions be considered, and that researchers from sociology, anthropology, ethics, economics, health services research, as well as psychology, become engaged. This paper proposes a range of possible research topics and indicates likely trends in research design and methodology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025768260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025768260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 150

EP - 156

JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

SN - 1055-6656

IS - 2

ER -