Dilemmas of an economic theorist

Ariel Rubinstein

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    What on earth are economic theorists like me trying to accomplish? This paper discusses four dilemmas encountered by an economic theorist: The dilemma of absurd conclusions: Should we abandon a model if it produces absurd conclusions or should we regard a model as a very limited set of assumptions that will inevitably fail in some contexts? The dilemma of responding to evidence: Should our models be judged according to experimental results? The dilemma of modelless regularities: Should models provide the hypothesis for testing or are they simply exercises in logic that have no use in identifying regularities? The dilemma of relevance: Do we have the right to offer advice or to make statements that are intended to influence the real world?

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)865-883
    Number of pages19
    JournalEconometrica
    Volume74
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dilemma
    Economics
    regularity
    economics
    Regularity
    Model
    Exercise
    Logic
    Testing
    evidence
    Experimental Results

    Keywords

    • Economic education
    • Economic theory
    • Fable
    • Game theory
    • Hyperbolic discounting
    • Jungle
    • Time response

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Mathematics (miscellaneous)
    • Statistics and Probability
    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    Dilemmas of an economic theorist. / Rubinstein, Ariel.

    In: Econometrica, Vol. 74, No. 4, 07.2006, p. 865-883.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Rubinstein, Ariel. / Dilemmas of an economic theorist. In: Econometrica. 2006 ; Vol. 74, No. 4. pp. 865-883.
    @article{2b08a60b7dc747b5854dac5b28427e70,
    title = "Dilemmas of an economic theorist",
    abstract = "What on earth are economic theorists like me trying to accomplish? This paper discusses four dilemmas encountered by an economic theorist: The dilemma of absurd conclusions: Should we abandon a model if it produces absurd conclusions or should we regard a model as a very limited set of assumptions that will inevitably fail in some contexts? The dilemma of responding to evidence: Should our models be judged according to experimental results? The dilemma of modelless regularities: Should models provide the hypothesis for testing or are they simply exercises in logic that have no use in identifying regularities? The dilemma of relevance: Do we have the right to offer advice or to make statements that are intended to influence the real world?",
    keywords = "Economic education, Economic theory, Fable, Game theory, Hyperbolic discounting, Jungle, Time response",
    author = "Ariel Rubinstein",
    year = "2006",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00689.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "74",
    pages = "865--883",
    journal = "Econometrica",
    issn = "0012-9682",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Dilemmas of an economic theorist

    AU - Rubinstein, Ariel

    PY - 2006/7

    Y1 - 2006/7

    N2 - What on earth are economic theorists like me trying to accomplish? This paper discusses four dilemmas encountered by an economic theorist: The dilemma of absurd conclusions: Should we abandon a model if it produces absurd conclusions or should we regard a model as a very limited set of assumptions that will inevitably fail in some contexts? The dilemma of responding to evidence: Should our models be judged according to experimental results? The dilemma of modelless regularities: Should models provide the hypothesis for testing or are they simply exercises in logic that have no use in identifying regularities? The dilemma of relevance: Do we have the right to offer advice or to make statements that are intended to influence the real world?

    AB - What on earth are economic theorists like me trying to accomplish? This paper discusses four dilemmas encountered by an economic theorist: The dilemma of absurd conclusions: Should we abandon a model if it produces absurd conclusions or should we regard a model as a very limited set of assumptions that will inevitably fail in some contexts? The dilemma of responding to evidence: Should our models be judged according to experimental results? The dilemma of modelless regularities: Should models provide the hypothesis for testing or are they simply exercises in logic that have no use in identifying regularities? The dilemma of relevance: Do we have the right to offer advice or to make statements that are intended to influence the real world?

    KW - Economic education

    KW - Economic theory

    KW - Fable

    KW - Game theory

    KW - Hyperbolic discounting

    KW - Jungle

    KW - Time response

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745305704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745305704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00689.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00689.x

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 74

    SP - 865

    EP - 883

    JO - Econometrica

    JF - Econometrica

    SN - 0012-9682

    IS - 4

    ER -