Difficulty and diagnosticity as determinants of choice among tasks

Yaacov Trope, Philip Brickman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Performed a Bayesian analysis of attributions of ability made from success or failure. If people are primarily interested in maximizing the information they gain about themselves, they should prefer easy or hard tasks to moderate difficulty ones when the easy or the hard tasks are made more diagnostic of their true ability. If people are primarily interested in maximizing the simple expected value of success, they should prefer intermediate difficulty tasks regardless of diagnosticity. Data from 120 male undergraduates strongly support the idea that diagnosticity is the major determinant of preference among achievement tasks and suggests that it should be a basic parameter in all research on self- and social attribution. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)918-925
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1975

Fingerprint

Aptitude
attribution
determinants
Bayes Theorem
ability
diagnostic
Research

Keywords

  • diagnosticity &
  • difficulty, choice of achievement tasks, male college students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Difficulty and diagnosticity as determinants of choice among tasks. / Trope, Yaacov; Brickman, Philip.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 5, 05.1975, p. 918-925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f82de6aca0d646efafc6b08501d79309,
title = "Difficulty and diagnosticity as determinants of choice among tasks",
abstract = "Performed a Bayesian analysis of attributions of ability made from success or failure. If people are primarily interested in maximizing the information they gain about themselves, they should prefer easy or hard tasks to moderate difficulty ones when the easy or the hard tasks are made more diagnostic of their true ability. If people are primarily interested in maximizing the simple expected value of success, they should prefer intermediate difficulty tasks regardless of diagnosticity. Data from 120 male undergraduates strongly support the idea that diagnosticity is the major determinant of preference among achievement tasks and suggests that it should be a basic parameter in all research on self- and social attribution. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "diagnosticity &, difficulty, choice of achievement tasks, male college students",
author = "Yaacov Trope and Philip Brickman",
year = "1975",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/h0076792",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "918--925",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Difficulty and diagnosticity as determinants of choice among tasks

AU - Trope, Yaacov

AU - Brickman, Philip

PY - 1975/5

Y1 - 1975/5

N2 - Performed a Bayesian analysis of attributions of ability made from success or failure. If people are primarily interested in maximizing the information they gain about themselves, they should prefer easy or hard tasks to moderate difficulty ones when the easy or the hard tasks are made more diagnostic of their true ability. If people are primarily interested in maximizing the simple expected value of success, they should prefer intermediate difficulty tasks regardless of diagnosticity. Data from 120 male undergraduates strongly support the idea that diagnosticity is the major determinant of preference among achievement tasks and suggests that it should be a basic parameter in all research on self- and social attribution. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Performed a Bayesian analysis of attributions of ability made from success or failure. If people are primarily interested in maximizing the information they gain about themselves, they should prefer easy or hard tasks to moderate difficulty ones when the easy or the hard tasks are made more diagnostic of their true ability. If people are primarily interested in maximizing the simple expected value of success, they should prefer intermediate difficulty tasks regardless of diagnosticity. Data from 120 male undergraduates strongly support the idea that diagnosticity is the major determinant of preference among achievement tasks and suggests that it should be a basic parameter in all research on self- and social attribution. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - diagnosticity &

KW - difficulty, choice of achievement tasks, male college students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041072024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041072024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0076792

DO - 10.1037/h0076792

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041072024

VL - 31

SP - 918

EP - 925

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -