Differential effects of cognitive load on subjective versus motor responses to ambiguously valenced facial expressions

Alison M. Mattek, Paul J. Whalen, Julia L. Berkowitz, Jonathan Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Valence is a principal dimension by which we understand emotional experiences, but oftentimes events are not easily classified as strictly positive or negative. Inevitably, individuals vary in how they tend to interpret the valence of ambiguous situations. Surprised facial expressions are one example of a well-defined, ambiguous affective event that induces trait-like differences in the propensity to form a positive or negative interpretation. To investigate the nature of this affective bias, we asked participants to organize emotional facial expressions (surprised, happy, sad) into positive/negative categories while recording their hand-movement trajectories en route to each response choice. We found that positivitynegativity bias resulted in differential hand movements for modal versus nonmodal response trajectories, such that when an individual categorized a surprised face according to his or her nonmodal interpretation (e.g., a negatively biased individual selecting a positive interpretation), the hand showed an enhanced spatial attraction to the alternative, modal response option (e.g., negative) in the opposite corner of the computer screen (Experiment 1). Critically, we also demonstrate that this asymmetry between modal versus nonmodal response trajectories is mitigated when the valence interpretations are made under a cognitive load, although the frequency of modal interpretations is unaffected by the load (Experiment 2). These data inform a body of seemingly disparate findings regarding the effect of cognitive effort on affective responses, by showing within a single paradigm that varying cognitive load selectively alters the dynamic motor movements involved in indicating affective interpretations, whereas the subjective interpretations themselves remain consistent across variable cognitive loads.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)929-936
Number of pages8
JournalEmotion
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Facial Expression
Hand

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Ambiguity
  • Cognitive load
  • Mouse-tracking
  • Valence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Differential effects of cognitive load on subjective versus motor responses to ambiguously valenced facial expressions. / Mattek, Alison M.; Whalen, Paul J.; Berkowitz, Julia L.; Freeman, Jonathan.

In: Emotion, Vol. 16, No. 6, 01.09.2016, p. 929-936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mattek, Alison M. ; Whalen, Paul J. ; Berkowitz, Julia L. ; Freeman, Jonathan. / Differential effects of cognitive load on subjective versus motor responses to ambiguously valenced facial expressions. In: Emotion. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 6. pp. 929-936.
@article{a5d533f38dc94686814e5fc64492c7eb,
title = "Differential effects of cognitive load on subjective versus motor responses to ambiguously valenced facial expressions",
abstract = "Valence is a principal dimension by which we understand emotional experiences, but oftentimes events are not easily classified as strictly positive or negative. Inevitably, individuals vary in how they tend to interpret the valence of ambiguous situations. Surprised facial expressions are one example of a well-defined, ambiguous affective event that induces trait-like differences in the propensity to form a positive or negative interpretation. To investigate the nature of this affective bias, we asked participants to organize emotional facial expressions (surprised, happy, sad) into positive/negative categories while recording their hand-movement trajectories en route to each response choice. We found that positivitynegativity bias resulted in differential hand movements for modal versus nonmodal response trajectories, such that when an individual categorized a surprised face according to his or her nonmodal interpretation (e.g., a negatively biased individual selecting a positive interpretation), the hand showed an enhanced spatial attraction to the alternative, modal response option (e.g., negative) in the opposite corner of the computer screen (Experiment 1). Critically, we also demonstrate that this asymmetry between modal versus nonmodal response trajectories is mitigated when the valence interpretations are made under a cognitive load, although the frequency of modal interpretations is unaffected by the load (Experiment 2). These data inform a body of seemingly disparate findings regarding the effect of cognitive effort on affective responses, by showing within a single paradigm that varying cognitive load selectively alters the dynamic motor movements involved in indicating affective interpretations, whereas the subjective interpretations themselves remain consistent across variable cognitive loads.",
keywords = "Affect, Ambiguity, Cognitive load, Mouse-tracking, Valence",
author = "Mattek, {Alison M.} and Whalen, {Paul J.} and Berkowitz, {Julia L.} and Jonathan Freeman",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/emo0000148",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "929--936",
journal = "Emotion",
issn = "1528-3542",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential effects of cognitive load on subjective versus motor responses to ambiguously valenced facial expressions

AU - Mattek, Alison M.

AU - Whalen, Paul J.

AU - Berkowitz, Julia L.

AU - Freeman, Jonathan

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Valence is a principal dimension by which we understand emotional experiences, but oftentimes events are not easily classified as strictly positive or negative. Inevitably, individuals vary in how they tend to interpret the valence of ambiguous situations. Surprised facial expressions are one example of a well-defined, ambiguous affective event that induces trait-like differences in the propensity to form a positive or negative interpretation. To investigate the nature of this affective bias, we asked participants to organize emotional facial expressions (surprised, happy, sad) into positive/negative categories while recording their hand-movement trajectories en route to each response choice. We found that positivitynegativity bias resulted in differential hand movements for modal versus nonmodal response trajectories, such that when an individual categorized a surprised face according to his or her nonmodal interpretation (e.g., a negatively biased individual selecting a positive interpretation), the hand showed an enhanced spatial attraction to the alternative, modal response option (e.g., negative) in the opposite corner of the computer screen (Experiment 1). Critically, we also demonstrate that this asymmetry between modal versus nonmodal response trajectories is mitigated when the valence interpretations are made under a cognitive load, although the frequency of modal interpretations is unaffected by the load (Experiment 2). These data inform a body of seemingly disparate findings regarding the effect of cognitive effort on affective responses, by showing within a single paradigm that varying cognitive load selectively alters the dynamic motor movements involved in indicating affective interpretations, whereas the subjective interpretations themselves remain consistent across variable cognitive loads.

AB - Valence is a principal dimension by which we understand emotional experiences, but oftentimes events are not easily classified as strictly positive or negative. Inevitably, individuals vary in how they tend to interpret the valence of ambiguous situations. Surprised facial expressions are one example of a well-defined, ambiguous affective event that induces trait-like differences in the propensity to form a positive or negative interpretation. To investigate the nature of this affective bias, we asked participants to organize emotional facial expressions (surprised, happy, sad) into positive/negative categories while recording their hand-movement trajectories en route to each response choice. We found that positivitynegativity bias resulted in differential hand movements for modal versus nonmodal response trajectories, such that when an individual categorized a surprised face according to his or her nonmodal interpretation (e.g., a negatively biased individual selecting a positive interpretation), the hand showed an enhanced spatial attraction to the alternative, modal response option (e.g., negative) in the opposite corner of the computer screen (Experiment 1). Critically, we also demonstrate that this asymmetry between modal versus nonmodal response trajectories is mitigated when the valence interpretations are made under a cognitive load, although the frequency of modal interpretations is unaffected by the load (Experiment 2). These data inform a body of seemingly disparate findings regarding the effect of cognitive effort on affective responses, by showing within a single paradigm that varying cognitive load selectively alters the dynamic motor movements involved in indicating affective interpretations, whereas the subjective interpretations themselves remain consistent across variable cognitive loads.

KW - Affect

KW - Ambiguity

KW - Cognitive load

KW - Mouse-tracking

KW - Valence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984823971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984823971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/emo0000148

DO - 10.1037/emo0000148

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 929

EP - 936

JO - Emotion

JF - Emotion

SN - 1528-3542

IS - 6

ER -