Differential control of active and silent phases in relaxation models of neuronal rhythms

Joël Tabak, Michael J. O'Donovan, John Rinzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rhythmic bursting activity, found in many biological systems, serves a variety of important functions. Such activity is composed of episodes, or bursts (the active phase, AP) that are separated by quiescent periods (the silent phase, SP). Here, we use mean field, firing rate models of excitatory neural network activity to study how AP and SP durations depend on two critical network parameters that control network connectivity and cellular excitability. In these models, the AP and SP correspond to the network's underlying bistability on a fast time scale due to rapid recurrent excitatory connectivity. Activity switches between the AP and SP because of two types of slow negative feedback: synaptic depression - which has a divisive effect on the network input/ output function, or cellular adaptation - a subtractive effect on the input/output function. We show that if a model incorporates the divisive process (regardless of the presence of the subtractive process), then increasing cellular excitability will speed up the activity, mostly by decreasing the silent phase. Reciprocally, if the subtractive process is present, increasing the excitatory connectivity will slow down the activity, mostly by lengthening the active phase. We also show that the model incorporating both slow processes is less sensitive to parameter variations than the models with only one process. Finally, we note that these network models are formally analogous to a type of cellular pacemaker and thus similar results apply to these cellular pacemakers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-328
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Computational Neuroscience
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Neural Networks (Computer)

Keywords

  • Cellular adaptation
  • Episodic activity
  • Excitatory network
  • Mean field model
  • Synaptic depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Differential control of active and silent phases in relaxation models of neuronal rhythms. / Tabak, Joël; O'Donovan, Michael J.; Rinzel, John.

In: Journal of Computational Neuroscience, Vol. 21, No. 3, 12.2006, p. 307-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09e57fc0ec214d4697eb623ca8cc5e87,
title = "Differential control of active and silent phases in relaxation models of neuronal rhythms",
abstract = "Rhythmic bursting activity, found in many biological systems, serves a variety of important functions. Such activity is composed of episodes, or bursts (the active phase, AP) that are separated by quiescent periods (the silent phase, SP). Here, we use mean field, firing rate models of excitatory neural network activity to study how AP and SP durations depend on two critical network parameters that control network connectivity and cellular excitability. In these models, the AP and SP correspond to the network's underlying bistability on a fast time scale due to rapid recurrent excitatory connectivity. Activity switches between the AP and SP because of two types of slow negative feedback: synaptic depression - which has a divisive effect on the network input/ output function, or cellular adaptation - a subtractive effect on the input/output function. We show that if a model incorporates the divisive process (regardless of the presence of the subtractive process), then increasing cellular excitability will speed up the activity, mostly by decreasing the silent phase. Reciprocally, if the subtractive process is present, increasing the excitatory connectivity will slow down the activity, mostly by lengthening the active phase. We also show that the model incorporating both slow processes is less sensitive to parameter variations than the models with only one process. Finally, we note that these network models are formally analogous to a type of cellular pacemaker and thus similar results apply to these cellular pacemakers.",
keywords = "Cellular adaptation, Episodic activity, Excitatory network, Mean field model, Synaptic depression",
author = "Jo{\"e}l Tabak and O'Donovan, {Michael J.} and John Rinzel",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10827-006-8862-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "307--328",
journal = "Journal of Computational Neuroscience",
issn = "0929-5313",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential control of active and silent phases in relaxation models of neuronal rhythms

AU - Tabak, Joël

AU - O'Donovan, Michael J.

AU - Rinzel, John

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Rhythmic bursting activity, found in many biological systems, serves a variety of important functions. Such activity is composed of episodes, or bursts (the active phase, AP) that are separated by quiescent periods (the silent phase, SP). Here, we use mean field, firing rate models of excitatory neural network activity to study how AP and SP durations depend on two critical network parameters that control network connectivity and cellular excitability. In these models, the AP and SP correspond to the network's underlying bistability on a fast time scale due to rapid recurrent excitatory connectivity. Activity switches between the AP and SP because of two types of slow negative feedback: synaptic depression - which has a divisive effect on the network input/ output function, or cellular adaptation - a subtractive effect on the input/output function. We show that if a model incorporates the divisive process (regardless of the presence of the subtractive process), then increasing cellular excitability will speed up the activity, mostly by decreasing the silent phase. Reciprocally, if the subtractive process is present, increasing the excitatory connectivity will slow down the activity, mostly by lengthening the active phase. We also show that the model incorporating both slow processes is less sensitive to parameter variations than the models with only one process. Finally, we note that these network models are formally analogous to a type of cellular pacemaker and thus similar results apply to these cellular pacemakers.

AB - Rhythmic bursting activity, found in many biological systems, serves a variety of important functions. Such activity is composed of episodes, or bursts (the active phase, AP) that are separated by quiescent periods (the silent phase, SP). Here, we use mean field, firing rate models of excitatory neural network activity to study how AP and SP durations depend on two critical network parameters that control network connectivity and cellular excitability. In these models, the AP and SP correspond to the network's underlying bistability on a fast time scale due to rapid recurrent excitatory connectivity. Activity switches between the AP and SP because of two types of slow negative feedback: synaptic depression - which has a divisive effect on the network input/ output function, or cellular adaptation - a subtractive effect on the input/output function. We show that if a model incorporates the divisive process (regardless of the presence of the subtractive process), then increasing cellular excitability will speed up the activity, mostly by decreasing the silent phase. Reciprocally, if the subtractive process is present, increasing the excitatory connectivity will slow down the activity, mostly by lengthening the active phase. We also show that the model incorporating both slow processes is less sensitive to parameter variations than the models with only one process. Finally, we note that these network models are formally analogous to a type of cellular pacemaker and thus similar results apply to these cellular pacemakers.

KW - Cellular adaptation

KW - Episodic activity

KW - Excitatory network

KW - Mean field model

KW - Synaptic depression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749531532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749531532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10827-006-8862-7

DO - 10.1007/s10827-006-8862-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 16896520

AN - SCOPUS:33749531532

VL - 21

SP - 307

EP - 328

JO - Journal of Computational Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Computational Neuroscience

SN - 0929-5313

IS - 3

ER -