Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women

Katherine M. Brown, Bettina F. Drake, Sarah Gehlert, Leslie E. Wolf, James DuBois, Joann Seo, Krista Woodward, Hannah Perkins, Melody Goodman, Kimberly A. Kaphingst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Biobanks are essential resources, and participation by individuals from diverse groups is needed. Various models of consent have been proposed for secondary research use of biospecimens, differing in level of donor control and information received. Data are needed regarding participant preferences for models of consent, particularly among minorities. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 60 women to examine their attitudes about different models of consent. Recruitment was stratified by race (Black/White) and prior biobank participation (yes/no). Two coders independently coded interview transcripts. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. The majority of Black and White participants preferred “broad” consent (i.e., blanket permission for secondary research use of biospecimens), and the second most preferred model for both groups was “study-specific” consent (i.e., consent for each future research study). The qualitative analysis showed that participants selected their most preferred model for 3 major reasons: having enough information, having control over their sample, and being asked for permission. Least preferred was notice model (i.e., participants notified that biospecimens may be used in future research). Attitudes toward models of consent differed somewhat by race and prior biobank participation. Participants preferred models of consent for secondary research use of biospecimens that provided them with both specific and general information, control over their biospecimens, and asked them to give permission for use. Our findings suggest that it will be important for researchers to provide information about future uses of biospecimens to the extent possible and have an explicit permission step for secondary research use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-49
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Community Genetics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Research
Interviews
Research Personnel
Tissue Donors
hydroquinone

Keywords

  • Biobanks
  • Informed consent
  • Participant preferences
  • Race/ethnicity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Brown, K. M., Drake, B. F., Gehlert, S., Wolf, L. E., DuBois, J., Seo, J., ... Kaphingst, K. A. (2016). Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women. Journal of Community Genetics, 7(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-015-0248-y

Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women. / Brown, Katherine M.; Drake, Bettina F.; Gehlert, Sarah; Wolf, Leslie E.; DuBois, James; Seo, Joann; Woodward, Krista; Perkins, Hannah; Goodman, Melody; Kaphingst, Kimberly A.

In: Journal of Community Genetics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 41-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, KM, Drake, BF, Gehlert, S, Wolf, LE, DuBois, J, Seo, J, Woodward, K, Perkins, H, Goodman, M & Kaphingst, KA 2016, 'Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women', Journal of Community Genetics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-015-0248-y
Brown, Katherine M. ; Drake, Bettina F. ; Gehlert, Sarah ; Wolf, Leslie E. ; DuBois, James ; Seo, Joann ; Woodward, Krista ; Perkins, Hannah ; Goodman, Melody ; Kaphingst, Kimberly A. / Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women. In: Journal of Community Genetics. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 41-49.
@article{4ccf628601244a68aa4a4ab7ad518b59,
title = "Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women",
abstract = "Biobanks are essential resources, and participation by individuals from diverse groups is needed. Various models of consent have been proposed for secondary research use of biospecimens, differing in level of donor control and information received. Data are needed regarding participant preferences for models of consent, particularly among minorities. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 60 women to examine their attitudes about different models of consent. Recruitment was stratified by race (Black/White) and prior biobank participation (yes/no). Two coders independently coded interview transcripts. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. The majority of Black and White participants preferred “broad” consent (i.e., blanket permission for secondary research use of biospecimens), and the second most preferred model for both groups was “study-specific” consent (i.e., consent for each future research study). The qualitative analysis showed that participants selected their most preferred model for 3 major reasons: having enough information, having control over their sample, and being asked for permission. Least preferred was notice model (i.e., participants notified that biospecimens may be used in future research). Attitudes toward models of consent differed somewhat by race and prior biobank participation. Participants preferred models of consent for secondary research use of biospecimens that provided them with both specific and general information, control over their biospecimens, and asked them to give permission for use. Our findings suggest that it will be important for researchers to provide information about future uses of biospecimens to the extent possible and have an explicit permission step for secondary research use.",
keywords = "Biobanks, Informed consent, Participant preferences, Race/ethnicity",
author = "Brown, {Katherine M.} and Drake, {Bettina F.} and Sarah Gehlert and Wolf, {Leslie E.} and James DuBois and Joann Seo and Krista Woodward and Hannah Perkins and Melody Goodman and Kaphingst, {Kimberly A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12687-015-0248-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "41--49",
journal = "Journal of Community Genetics",
issn = "1868-310X",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women

AU - Brown, Katherine M.

AU - Drake, Bettina F.

AU - Gehlert, Sarah

AU - Wolf, Leslie E.

AU - DuBois, James

AU - Seo, Joann

AU - Woodward, Krista

AU - Perkins, Hannah

AU - Goodman, Melody

AU - Kaphingst, Kimberly A.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Biobanks are essential resources, and participation by individuals from diverse groups is needed. Various models of consent have been proposed for secondary research use of biospecimens, differing in level of donor control and information received. Data are needed regarding participant preferences for models of consent, particularly among minorities. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 60 women to examine their attitudes about different models of consent. Recruitment was stratified by race (Black/White) and prior biobank participation (yes/no). Two coders independently coded interview transcripts. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. The majority of Black and White participants preferred “broad” consent (i.e., blanket permission for secondary research use of biospecimens), and the second most preferred model for both groups was “study-specific” consent (i.e., consent for each future research study). The qualitative analysis showed that participants selected their most preferred model for 3 major reasons: having enough information, having control over their sample, and being asked for permission. Least preferred was notice model (i.e., participants notified that biospecimens may be used in future research). Attitudes toward models of consent differed somewhat by race and prior biobank participation. Participants preferred models of consent for secondary research use of biospecimens that provided them with both specific and general information, control over their biospecimens, and asked them to give permission for use. Our findings suggest that it will be important for researchers to provide information about future uses of biospecimens to the extent possible and have an explicit permission step for secondary research use.

AB - Biobanks are essential resources, and participation by individuals from diverse groups is needed. Various models of consent have been proposed for secondary research use of biospecimens, differing in level of donor control and information received. Data are needed regarding participant preferences for models of consent, particularly among minorities. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 60 women to examine their attitudes about different models of consent. Recruitment was stratified by race (Black/White) and prior biobank participation (yes/no). Two coders independently coded interview transcripts. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. The majority of Black and White participants preferred “broad” consent (i.e., blanket permission for secondary research use of biospecimens), and the second most preferred model for both groups was “study-specific” consent (i.e., consent for each future research study). The qualitative analysis showed that participants selected their most preferred model for 3 major reasons: having enough information, having control over their sample, and being asked for permission. Least preferred was notice model (i.e., participants notified that biospecimens may be used in future research). Attitudes toward models of consent differed somewhat by race and prior biobank participation. Participants preferred models of consent for secondary research use of biospecimens that provided them with both specific and general information, control over their biospecimens, and asked them to give permission for use. Our findings suggest that it will be important for researchers to provide information about future uses of biospecimens to the extent possible and have an explicit permission step for secondary research use.

KW - Biobanks

KW - Informed consent

KW - Participant preferences

KW - Race/ethnicity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955201235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955201235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12687-015-0248-y

DO - 10.1007/s12687-015-0248-y

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 41

EP - 49

JO - Journal of Community Genetics

JF - Journal of Community Genetics

SN - 1868-310X

IS - 1

ER -