Did teachers' verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited

Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Dominic J. Brewer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Our paper reanalyzes data from the classic 1966 study Equality of Educational Opportunity, or Coleman Report. It addresses whether teacher characteristics, including verbal ability and race, influenced "synthetic gain scores" of students (mean test scores of upper grade students in a school minus mean test scores of lower grade students in a school), in the context of an econometric model that allows for the possibility that teacher characteristics in a school are endogenously determined. We find that verbal aptitude scores of teachers influenced synthetic grain scores for both black and white students. Verbal aptitude mattered as much for black teachers as it did for white teachers. Finally, holding teacher characteristics other than race constant, in some specifications black teachers were associated with higher gain scores for black high school students, but lower gain scores for white elementary and secondary students. Because these findings are for American schools in the mid-1960s, they do not directly apply to our contemporary experience. However, they do raise issues that should be addressed in discussions of hiring policies in American education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

ability
teacher
school
student
aptitude
educational opportunity
hiring
econometrics
agricultural product
equality
education
experience
Education
Test scores

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Did teachers' verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited. / Ehrenberg, Ronald G.; Brewer, Dominic J.

In: Economics of Education Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1995, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{532513484cdc4ccd93396efcb3d013ae,
title = "Did teachers' verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited",
abstract = "Our paper reanalyzes data from the classic 1966 study Equality of Educational Opportunity, or Coleman Report. It addresses whether teacher characteristics, including verbal ability and race, influenced {"}synthetic gain scores{"} of students (mean test scores of upper grade students in a school minus mean test scores of lower grade students in a school), in the context of an econometric model that allows for the possibility that teacher characteristics in a school are endogenously determined. We find that verbal aptitude scores of teachers influenced synthetic grain scores for both black and white students. Verbal aptitude mattered as much for black teachers as it did for white teachers. Finally, holding teacher characteristics other than race constant, in some specifications black teachers were associated with higher gain scores for black high school students, but lower gain scores for white elementary and secondary students. Because these findings are for American schools in the mid-1960s, they do not directly apply to our contemporary experience. However, they do raise issues that should be addressed in discussions of hiring policies in American education.",
author = "Ehrenberg, {Ronald G.} and Brewer, {Dominic J.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0272-7757(94)00031-Z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Economics of Education Review",
issn = "0272-7757",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Did teachers' verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited

AU - Ehrenberg, Ronald G.

AU - Brewer, Dominic J.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Our paper reanalyzes data from the classic 1966 study Equality of Educational Opportunity, or Coleman Report. It addresses whether teacher characteristics, including verbal ability and race, influenced "synthetic gain scores" of students (mean test scores of upper grade students in a school minus mean test scores of lower grade students in a school), in the context of an econometric model that allows for the possibility that teacher characteristics in a school are endogenously determined. We find that verbal aptitude scores of teachers influenced synthetic grain scores for both black and white students. Verbal aptitude mattered as much for black teachers as it did for white teachers. Finally, holding teacher characteristics other than race constant, in some specifications black teachers were associated with higher gain scores for black high school students, but lower gain scores for white elementary and secondary students. Because these findings are for American schools in the mid-1960s, they do not directly apply to our contemporary experience. However, they do raise issues that should be addressed in discussions of hiring policies in American education.

AB - Our paper reanalyzes data from the classic 1966 study Equality of Educational Opportunity, or Coleman Report. It addresses whether teacher characteristics, including verbal ability and race, influenced "synthetic gain scores" of students (mean test scores of upper grade students in a school minus mean test scores of lower grade students in a school), in the context of an econometric model that allows for the possibility that teacher characteristics in a school are endogenously determined. We find that verbal aptitude scores of teachers influenced synthetic grain scores for both black and white students. Verbal aptitude mattered as much for black teachers as it did for white teachers. Finally, holding teacher characteristics other than race constant, in some specifications black teachers were associated with higher gain scores for black high school students, but lower gain scores for white elementary and secondary students. Because these findings are for American schools in the mid-1960s, they do not directly apply to our contemporary experience. However, they do raise issues that should be addressed in discussions of hiring policies in American education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21244492130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21244492130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0272-7757(94)00031-Z

DO - 10.1016/0272-7757(94)00031-Z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21244492130

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Economics of Education Review

JF - Economics of Education Review

SN - 0272-7757

IS - 1

ER -