Diagnostic Issues and Controversies in DSM-5: Return of the False Positives Problem

Jerome C. Wakefield

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The fifth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was the most controversial in the manual's history. This review selectively surveys some of the most important changes in DSM-5, including structural/organizational changes, modifications of diagnostic criteria, and newly introduced categories. It analyzes why these changes led to such heated controversies, which included objections to the revision's process, its goals, and the content of altered criteria and new categories. The central focus is on disputes concerning the false positives problem of setting a valid boundary between disorder and normal variation. Finally, this review highlights key problems and issues that currently remain unresolved and need to be addressed in the future, including systematically identifying false positive weaknesses in criteria, distinguishing risk from disorder, including context in diagnostic criteria, clarifying how to handle fuzzy boundaries, and improving the guidelines for "other specified" diagnosis.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)105-132
    Number of pages28
    JournalAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology
    Volume12
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 28 2016

    Fingerprint

    Organizational Innovation
    Dissent and Disputes
    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
    History
    Guidelines
    Surveys and Questionnaires

    Keywords

    • Diagnosis
    • False positives
    • Harmful dysfunction
    • Mental disorder
    • Validity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Cite this

    Diagnostic Issues and Controversies in DSM-5 : Return of the False Positives Problem. / Wakefield, Jerome C.

    In: Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 12, 28.03.2016, p. 105-132.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{a3a5033380b345399ad7d24ba1c61b5d,
    title = "Diagnostic Issues and Controversies in DSM-5: Return of the False Positives Problem",
    abstract = "The fifth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was the most controversial in the manual's history. This review selectively surveys some of the most important changes in DSM-5, including structural/organizational changes, modifications of diagnostic criteria, and newly introduced categories. It analyzes why these changes led to such heated controversies, which included objections to the revision's process, its goals, and the content of altered criteria and new categories. The central focus is on disputes concerning the false positives problem of setting a valid boundary between disorder and normal variation. Finally, this review highlights key problems and issues that currently remain unresolved and need to be addressed in the future, including systematically identifying false positive weaknesses in criteria, distinguishing risk from disorder, including context in diagnostic criteria, clarifying how to handle fuzzy boundaries, and improving the guidelines for {"}other specified{"} diagnosis.",
    keywords = "Diagnosis, False positives, Harmful dysfunction, Mental disorder, Validity",
    author = "Wakefield, {Jerome C.}",
    year = "2016",
    month = "3",
    day = "28",
    doi = "10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112800",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "105--132",
    journal = "Annual Review of Clinical Psychology",
    issn = "1548-5943",
    publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Diagnostic Issues and Controversies in DSM-5

    T2 - Return of the False Positives Problem

    AU - Wakefield, Jerome C.

    PY - 2016/3/28

    Y1 - 2016/3/28

    N2 - The fifth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was the most controversial in the manual's history. This review selectively surveys some of the most important changes in DSM-5, including structural/organizational changes, modifications of diagnostic criteria, and newly introduced categories. It analyzes why these changes led to such heated controversies, which included objections to the revision's process, its goals, and the content of altered criteria and new categories. The central focus is on disputes concerning the false positives problem of setting a valid boundary between disorder and normal variation. Finally, this review highlights key problems and issues that currently remain unresolved and need to be addressed in the future, including systematically identifying false positive weaknesses in criteria, distinguishing risk from disorder, including context in diagnostic criteria, clarifying how to handle fuzzy boundaries, and improving the guidelines for "other specified" diagnosis.

    AB - The fifth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was the most controversial in the manual's history. This review selectively surveys some of the most important changes in DSM-5, including structural/organizational changes, modifications of diagnostic criteria, and newly introduced categories. It analyzes why these changes led to such heated controversies, which included objections to the revision's process, its goals, and the content of altered criteria and new categories. The central focus is on disputes concerning the false positives problem of setting a valid boundary between disorder and normal variation. Finally, this review highlights key problems and issues that currently remain unresolved and need to be addressed in the future, including systematically identifying false positive weaknesses in criteria, distinguishing risk from disorder, including context in diagnostic criteria, clarifying how to handle fuzzy boundaries, and improving the guidelines for "other specified" diagnosis.

    KW - Diagnosis

    KW - False positives

    KW - Harmful dysfunction

    KW - Mental disorder

    KW - Validity

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962162073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962162073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112800

    DO - 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112800

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 105

    EP - 132

    JO - Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

    JF - Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

    SN - 1548-5943

    ER -