Developmental trends in peer victimization and emotional distress in LGB and heterosexual youth

Joseph P. Robinson, Dorothy L. Espelage, Ian Rivers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study had 2 objectives: Our first objective was to provide the first evidence of developmental trends in victimization rates for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB)- and heterosexual-identified youth, both in absolute and relative terms, and to examine differences by gender. Our second objective was to examine links between victimization, sexual identity, and later emotional distress. METHODS: Data are from a nationally representative prospective cohort study of youth in England were collected annually between 2004 and 2010. Our final analytic dataset includes 4135 participants with data at all 7 waves; 4.5% (n = 187) identified as LGB. Analyses included hierarchical linear modeling, propensity score matching, and structural equation modeling. RESULTS: LGB victimization rates decreased in absolute terms. However, trends in relative rates were more nuanced: Gay/bisexual-identified boys became more likely to be victimized compared with heterosexualidentified boys (wave 1: odds ratio [OR] = 1.78, P = .011; wave 7: OR = 3.95, P = .001), whereas relative rates among girls approached parity (wave 1: OR = 1.95, P = .001; wave 7: OR = 1.18, P = .689), suggesting different LGB-heterosexual relative victimization rate trends for boys and girls. Early victimization and emotional distress explained about 50% of later LGB-heterosexual emotional distress disparities for both boys and girls (each P < .015). CONCLUSIONS: Victimization of LGB youth decreases in absolute, but not necessarily relative, terms. The findings suggest that addressing LGB victimization during adolescence is critical to reducing LGB-heterosexual emotional distress disparities but additional support may be necessary to fully eliminate these disparities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-430
Number of pages8
JournalPediatrics
Volume131
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Crime Victims
Heterosexuality
Sexual Minorities
Lesbian
Victimization
Peers
Bisexual
Emotion
Odds Ratio
Waves
Boys

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Bisexual
  • Developmental trends
  • Emotional distress
  • Gay
  • Lesbian
  • Longitudinal analysis
  • Peer victimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Developmental trends in peer victimization and emotional distress in LGB and heterosexual youth. / Robinson, Joseph P.; Espelage, Dorothy L.; Rivers, Ian.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 131, No. 3, 03.2013, p. 423-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Robinson, Joseph P. ; Espelage, Dorothy L. ; Rivers, Ian. / Developmental trends in peer victimization and emotional distress in LGB and heterosexual youth. In: Pediatrics. 2013 ; Vol. 131, No. 3. pp. 423-430.
@article{ac9e380558cb4628a99c23a058471e2d,
title = "Developmental trends in peer victimization and emotional distress in LGB and heterosexual youth",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: This study had 2 objectives: Our first objective was to provide the first evidence of developmental trends in victimization rates for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB)- and heterosexual-identified youth, both in absolute and relative terms, and to examine differences by gender. Our second objective was to examine links between victimization, sexual identity, and later emotional distress. METHODS: Data are from a nationally representative prospective cohort study of youth in England were collected annually between 2004 and 2010. Our final analytic dataset includes 4135 participants with data at all 7 waves; 4.5{\%} (n = 187) identified as LGB. Analyses included hierarchical linear modeling, propensity score matching, and structural equation modeling. RESULTS: LGB victimization rates decreased in absolute terms. However, trends in relative rates were more nuanced: Gay/bisexual-identified boys became more likely to be victimized compared with heterosexualidentified boys (wave 1: odds ratio [OR] = 1.78, P = .011; wave 7: OR = 3.95, P = .001), whereas relative rates among girls approached parity (wave 1: OR = 1.95, P = .001; wave 7: OR = 1.18, P = .689), suggesting different LGB-heterosexual relative victimization rate trends for boys and girls. Early victimization and emotional distress explained about 50{\%} of later LGB-heterosexual emotional distress disparities for both boys and girls (each P < .015). CONCLUSIONS: Victimization of LGB youth decreases in absolute, but not necessarily relative, terms. The findings suggest that addressing LGB victimization during adolescence is critical to reducing LGB-heterosexual emotional distress disparities but additional support may be necessary to fully eliminate these disparities.",
keywords = "Adolescents, Bisexual, Developmental trends, Emotional distress, Gay, Lesbian, Longitudinal analysis, Peer victimization",
author = "Robinson, {Joseph P.} and Espelage, {Dorothy L.} and Ian Rivers",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2012-2595",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "423--430",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developmental trends in peer victimization and emotional distress in LGB and heterosexual youth

AU - Robinson, Joseph P.

AU - Espelage, Dorothy L.

AU - Rivers, Ian

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study had 2 objectives: Our first objective was to provide the first evidence of developmental trends in victimization rates for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB)- and heterosexual-identified youth, both in absolute and relative terms, and to examine differences by gender. Our second objective was to examine links between victimization, sexual identity, and later emotional distress. METHODS: Data are from a nationally representative prospective cohort study of youth in England were collected annually between 2004 and 2010. Our final analytic dataset includes 4135 participants with data at all 7 waves; 4.5% (n = 187) identified as LGB. Analyses included hierarchical linear modeling, propensity score matching, and structural equation modeling. RESULTS: LGB victimization rates decreased in absolute terms. However, trends in relative rates were more nuanced: Gay/bisexual-identified boys became more likely to be victimized compared with heterosexualidentified boys (wave 1: odds ratio [OR] = 1.78, P = .011; wave 7: OR = 3.95, P = .001), whereas relative rates among girls approached parity (wave 1: OR = 1.95, P = .001; wave 7: OR = 1.18, P = .689), suggesting different LGB-heterosexual relative victimization rate trends for boys and girls. Early victimization and emotional distress explained about 50% of later LGB-heterosexual emotional distress disparities for both boys and girls (each P < .015). CONCLUSIONS: Victimization of LGB youth decreases in absolute, but not necessarily relative, terms. The findings suggest that addressing LGB victimization during adolescence is critical to reducing LGB-heterosexual emotional distress disparities but additional support may be necessary to fully eliminate these disparities.

AB - OBJECTIVES: This study had 2 objectives: Our first objective was to provide the first evidence of developmental trends in victimization rates for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB)- and heterosexual-identified youth, both in absolute and relative terms, and to examine differences by gender. Our second objective was to examine links between victimization, sexual identity, and later emotional distress. METHODS: Data are from a nationally representative prospective cohort study of youth in England were collected annually between 2004 and 2010. Our final analytic dataset includes 4135 participants with data at all 7 waves; 4.5% (n = 187) identified as LGB. Analyses included hierarchical linear modeling, propensity score matching, and structural equation modeling. RESULTS: LGB victimization rates decreased in absolute terms. However, trends in relative rates were more nuanced: Gay/bisexual-identified boys became more likely to be victimized compared with heterosexualidentified boys (wave 1: odds ratio [OR] = 1.78, P = .011; wave 7: OR = 3.95, P = .001), whereas relative rates among girls approached parity (wave 1: OR = 1.95, P = .001; wave 7: OR = 1.18, P = .689), suggesting different LGB-heterosexual relative victimization rate trends for boys and girls. Early victimization and emotional distress explained about 50% of later LGB-heterosexual emotional distress disparities for both boys and girls (each P < .015). CONCLUSIONS: Victimization of LGB youth decreases in absolute, but not necessarily relative, terms. The findings suggest that addressing LGB victimization during adolescence is critical to reducing LGB-heterosexual emotional distress disparities but additional support may be necessary to fully eliminate these disparities.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Bisexual

KW - Developmental trends

KW - Emotional distress

KW - Gay

KW - Lesbian

KW - Longitudinal analysis

KW - Peer victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874640426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874640426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2012-2595

DO - 10.1542/peds.2012-2595

M3 - Article

C2 - 23382442

AN - SCOPUS:84874640426

VL - 131

SP - 423

EP - 430

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 3

ER -