Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release

Antje Ihlefeld, Yi Wen Chen, Dan Sanes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Hearing-impaired individuals experience difficulties in detecting or understanding speech, especially in background sounds within the same frequency range. However, normally hearing (NH) human listeners experience less difficulty detecting a target tone in background noise when the envelope of that noise is temporally gated (modulated) than when that envelope is flat across time (unmodulated). This perceptual benefit is called modulation masking release (MMR). When flanking masker energy is added well outside the frequency band of the target, and comodulated with the original modulated masker, detection thresholds improve further (MMR+). In contrast, if the flanking masker is antimodulated with the original masker, thresholds worsen (MMRâ). These interactions across disparate frequency ranges are thought to require central nervous system (CNS) processing. Therefore, we explored the effect of developmental conductive hearing loss (CHL) in gerbils on MMR characteristics, as a test for putative CNS mechanisms. The detection thresholds of NH gerbils were lower in modulated noise, when compared with unmodulated noise. The addition of a comodulated flanker further improved performance, whereas an antimodulated flanker worsened performance. However, for CHL-reared gerbils, all three forms of masking release were reduced when compared with NH animals. These results suggest that developmental CHL impairs both within- and across-frequency processing and provide behavioral evidence that CNS mechanisms are affected by a peripheral hearing impairment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTrends in hearing
Volume20
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 18 2016

Fingerprint

Conductive Hearing Loss
Hearing
Noise
Gerbillinae
Central Nervous System
Hearing Loss

Keywords

  • comodulation masking release
  • conductive hearing loss
  • deafness
  • gerbils
  • perceptual masking
  • sensory deprivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release. / Ihlefeld, Antje; Chen, Yi Wen; Sanes, Dan.

In: Trends in hearing, Vol. 20, 18.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{173ae4f467724ffa9a0e6728dc25eaa5,
title = "Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release",
abstract = "Hearing-impaired individuals experience difficulties in detecting or understanding speech, especially in background sounds within the same frequency range. However, normally hearing (NH) human listeners experience less difficulty detecting a target tone in background noise when the envelope of that noise is temporally gated (modulated) than when that envelope is flat across time (unmodulated). This perceptual benefit is called modulation masking release (MMR). When flanking masker energy is added well outside the frequency band of the target, and comodulated with the original modulated masker, detection thresholds improve further (MMR+). In contrast, if the flanking masker is antimodulated with the original masker, thresholds worsen (MMR{\^a}). These interactions across disparate frequency ranges are thought to require central nervous system (CNS) processing. Therefore, we explored the effect of developmental conductive hearing loss (CHL) in gerbils on MMR characteristics, as a test for putative CNS mechanisms. The detection thresholds of NH gerbils were lower in modulated noise, when compared with unmodulated noise. The addition of a comodulated flanker further improved performance, whereas an antimodulated flanker worsened performance. However, for CHL-reared gerbils, all three forms of masking release were reduced when compared with NH animals. These results suggest that developmental CHL impairs both within- and across-frequency processing and provide behavioral evidence that CNS mechanisms are affected by a peripheral hearing impairment.",
keywords = "comodulation masking release, conductive hearing loss, deafness, gerbils, perceptual masking, sensory deprivation",
author = "Antje Ihlefeld and Chen, {Yi Wen} and Dan Sanes",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1177/2331216516676255",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
journal = "Trends in hearing",
issn = "1084-7138",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release

AU - Ihlefeld, Antje

AU - Chen, Yi Wen

AU - Sanes, Dan

PY - 2016/1/18

Y1 - 2016/1/18

N2 - Hearing-impaired individuals experience difficulties in detecting or understanding speech, especially in background sounds within the same frequency range. However, normally hearing (NH) human listeners experience less difficulty detecting a target tone in background noise when the envelope of that noise is temporally gated (modulated) than when that envelope is flat across time (unmodulated). This perceptual benefit is called modulation masking release (MMR). When flanking masker energy is added well outside the frequency band of the target, and comodulated with the original modulated masker, detection thresholds improve further (MMR+). In contrast, if the flanking masker is antimodulated with the original masker, thresholds worsen (MMRâ). These interactions across disparate frequency ranges are thought to require central nervous system (CNS) processing. Therefore, we explored the effect of developmental conductive hearing loss (CHL) in gerbils on MMR characteristics, as a test for putative CNS mechanisms. The detection thresholds of NH gerbils were lower in modulated noise, when compared with unmodulated noise. The addition of a comodulated flanker further improved performance, whereas an antimodulated flanker worsened performance. However, for CHL-reared gerbils, all three forms of masking release were reduced when compared with NH animals. These results suggest that developmental CHL impairs both within- and across-frequency processing and provide behavioral evidence that CNS mechanisms are affected by a peripheral hearing impairment.

AB - Hearing-impaired individuals experience difficulties in detecting or understanding speech, especially in background sounds within the same frequency range. However, normally hearing (NH) human listeners experience less difficulty detecting a target tone in background noise when the envelope of that noise is temporally gated (modulated) than when that envelope is flat across time (unmodulated). This perceptual benefit is called modulation masking release (MMR). When flanking masker energy is added well outside the frequency band of the target, and comodulated with the original modulated masker, detection thresholds improve further (MMR+). In contrast, if the flanking masker is antimodulated with the original masker, thresholds worsen (MMRâ). These interactions across disparate frequency ranges are thought to require central nervous system (CNS) processing. Therefore, we explored the effect of developmental conductive hearing loss (CHL) in gerbils on MMR characteristics, as a test for putative CNS mechanisms. The detection thresholds of NH gerbils were lower in modulated noise, when compared with unmodulated noise. The addition of a comodulated flanker further improved performance, whereas an antimodulated flanker worsened performance. However, for CHL-reared gerbils, all three forms of masking release were reduced when compared with NH animals. These results suggest that developmental CHL impairs both within- and across-frequency processing and provide behavioral evidence that CNS mechanisms are affected by a peripheral hearing impairment.

KW - comodulation masking release

KW - conductive hearing loss

KW - deafness

KW - gerbils

KW - perceptual masking

KW - sensory deprivation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007602998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007602998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2331216516676255

DO - 10.1177/2331216516676255

M3 - Article

VL - 20

JO - Trends in hearing

JF - Trends in hearing

SN - 1084-7138

ER -