Developmental changes in the consideration of sample diversity in inductive reasoning

Marjorie Rhodes, Susan A. Gelman, Daniel Brickman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Determining whether a sample provides a good basis for broader generalizations is a basic challenge of inductive reasoning. Adults apply a diversity-based strategy to this challenge, expecting diverse samples to be a better basis for generalization than homogeneous samples. For example, adults expect that a property shared by two diverse mammals (e.g., a lion and a mouse) is more likely to be shared by all mammals than a property that is shared by two more similar mammals (e.g., a lion and a tiger). Across four studies, we document a developmental progression in children's understanding that diverse samples provide a strong basis for generalizations, such that young children (grade 1) consistently failed to consider sample diversity within their inductive reasoning, but older children (grade 5) preferred to create diverse samples on which to base inferences about basic-level categories. These results suggest that recognizing the value of a diverse sample for inductive reasoning emerges slowly across the elementary school years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-143
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Cognition and Development
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Lions
Mammals
Tigers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental Biology

Cite this

Developmental changes in the consideration of sample diversity in inductive reasoning. / Rhodes, Marjorie; Gelman, Susan A.; Brickman, Daniel.

In: Journal of Cognition and Development, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 112-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c500b0deaf2647a69b16d14dcbd9a7d3,
title = "Developmental changes in the consideration of sample diversity in inductive reasoning",
abstract = "Determining whether a sample provides a good basis for broader generalizations is a basic challenge of inductive reasoning. Adults apply a diversity-based strategy to this challenge, expecting diverse samples to be a better basis for generalization than homogeneous samples. For example, adults expect that a property shared by two diverse mammals (e.g., a lion and a mouse) is more likely to be shared by all mammals than a property that is shared by two more similar mammals (e.g., a lion and a tiger). Across four studies, we document a developmental progression in children's understanding that diverse samples provide a strong basis for generalizations, such that young children (grade 1) consistently failed to consider sample diversity within their inductive reasoning, but older children (grade 5) preferred to create diverse samples on which to base inferences about basic-level categories. These results suggest that recognizing the value of a diverse sample for inductive reasoning emerges slowly across the elementary school years.",
author = "Marjorie Rhodes and Gelman, {Susan A.} and Daniel Brickman",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15248370701836626",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "112--143",
journal = "Journal of Cognition and Development",
issn = "1524-8372",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developmental changes in the consideration of sample diversity in inductive reasoning

AU - Rhodes, Marjorie

AU - Gelman, Susan A.

AU - Brickman, Daniel

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Determining whether a sample provides a good basis for broader generalizations is a basic challenge of inductive reasoning. Adults apply a diversity-based strategy to this challenge, expecting diverse samples to be a better basis for generalization than homogeneous samples. For example, adults expect that a property shared by two diverse mammals (e.g., a lion and a mouse) is more likely to be shared by all mammals than a property that is shared by two more similar mammals (e.g., a lion and a tiger). Across four studies, we document a developmental progression in children's understanding that diverse samples provide a strong basis for generalizations, such that young children (grade 1) consistently failed to consider sample diversity within their inductive reasoning, but older children (grade 5) preferred to create diverse samples on which to base inferences about basic-level categories. These results suggest that recognizing the value of a diverse sample for inductive reasoning emerges slowly across the elementary school years.

AB - Determining whether a sample provides a good basis for broader generalizations is a basic challenge of inductive reasoning. Adults apply a diversity-based strategy to this challenge, expecting diverse samples to be a better basis for generalization than homogeneous samples. For example, adults expect that a property shared by two diverse mammals (e.g., a lion and a mouse) is more likely to be shared by all mammals than a property that is shared by two more similar mammals (e.g., a lion and a tiger). Across four studies, we document a developmental progression in children's understanding that diverse samples provide a strong basis for generalizations, such that young children (grade 1) consistently failed to consider sample diversity within their inductive reasoning, but older children (grade 5) preferred to create diverse samples on which to base inferences about basic-level categories. These results suggest that recognizing the value of a diverse sample for inductive reasoning emerges slowly across the elementary school years.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41449105789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41449105789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15248370701836626

DO - 10.1080/15248370701836626

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:41449105789

VL - 9

SP - 112

EP - 143

JO - Journal of Cognition and Development

JF - Journal of Cognition and Development

SN - 1524-8372

IS - 1

ER -