Development of a railroad grade crossing traffic signal warrant

Elena Prassas, William R. McShane, Edward Lieberman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

NCHRP funded a study of whether a traffic signal warrant for intersections near railroad at-grade crossings can and should be developed. The work was done under NCHRP 3-76A, and resulted in a proposed Warrant 9 to be added to the next edition of the MUTCD. This followed review and endorsement by the NCUTCD and its Task Forces. This paper presents the approach used in that work, with emphasis on the selection of a fatality-based risk exposure metric that is the foundation of the proposed warrant. A novelty is that if a signal is installed at Location "A" (the nearby intersection), it is based on the risk exposure at Location "B" (the approach crossing the track). The proposed warrant includes adjustment factors for train frequency, percentage of tractor-trailers on the minor approach, and vehicle occupancy (e.g. buses) on the same approach, and advises that alternatives such as providing a path for evasive maneuver and re-designation of the major/minor streets be considered prior to the signal alternative. A validation phase, not reported herein but contained in the project report, solicited data from various jurisdictions, along with their professional judgment on whether a signal is needed (albeit recognizing there is no current applicable warrant). The responses were compared to whether the warrant as written would have been triggered, and good compliance between the proposed warrant and the professional opinion was obtained.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInstitute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008
Pages88-101
Number of pages14
StatePublished - 2008
EventInstitute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008 - Anaheim, CA, United States
Duration: Aug 17 2008Aug 20 2008

Other

OtherInstitute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008
CountryUnited States
CityAnaheim, CA
Period8/17/088/20/08

Fingerprint

Crossings (pipe and cable)
Traffic signals
Railroads
railroad
traffic
Light trailers
edition
jurisdiction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

Prassas, E., McShane, W. R., & Lieberman, E. (2008). Development of a railroad grade crossing traffic signal warrant. In Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008 (pp. 88-101)

Development of a railroad grade crossing traffic signal warrant. / Prassas, Elena; McShane, William R.; Lieberman, Edward.

Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008. 2008. p. 88-101.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Prassas, E, McShane, WR & Lieberman, E 2008, Development of a railroad grade crossing traffic signal warrant. in Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008. pp. 88-101, Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008, Anaheim, CA, United States, 8/17/08.
Prassas E, McShane WR, Lieberman E. Development of a railroad grade crossing traffic signal warrant. In Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008. 2008. p. 88-101
Prassas, Elena ; McShane, William R. ; Lieberman, Edward. / Development of a railroad grade crossing traffic signal warrant. Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008. 2008. pp. 88-101
@inproceedings{8a170c381cb2471a819ac040dbe51f3d,
title = "Development of a railroad grade crossing traffic signal warrant",
abstract = "NCHRP funded a study of whether a traffic signal warrant for intersections near railroad at-grade crossings can and should be developed. The work was done under NCHRP 3-76A, and resulted in a proposed Warrant 9 to be added to the next edition of the MUTCD. This followed review and endorsement by the NCUTCD and its Task Forces. This paper presents the approach used in that work, with emphasis on the selection of a fatality-based risk exposure metric that is the foundation of the proposed warrant. A novelty is that if a signal is installed at Location {"}A{"} (the nearby intersection), it is based on the risk exposure at Location {"}B{"} (the approach crossing the track). The proposed warrant includes adjustment factors for train frequency, percentage of tractor-trailers on the minor approach, and vehicle occupancy (e.g. buses) on the same approach, and advises that alternatives such as providing a path for evasive maneuver and re-designation of the major/minor streets be considered prior to the signal alternative. A validation phase, not reported herein but contained in the project report, solicited data from various jurisdictions, along with their professional judgment on whether a signal is needed (albeit recognizing there is no current applicable warrant). The responses were compared to whether the warrant as written would have been triggered, and good compliance between the proposed warrant and the professional opinion was obtained.",
author = "Elena Prassas and McShane, {William R.} and Edward Lieberman",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781622761883",
pages = "88--101",
booktitle = "Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Development of a railroad grade crossing traffic signal warrant

AU - Prassas, Elena

AU - McShane, William R.

AU - Lieberman, Edward

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - NCHRP funded a study of whether a traffic signal warrant for intersections near railroad at-grade crossings can and should be developed. The work was done under NCHRP 3-76A, and resulted in a proposed Warrant 9 to be added to the next edition of the MUTCD. This followed review and endorsement by the NCUTCD and its Task Forces. This paper presents the approach used in that work, with emphasis on the selection of a fatality-based risk exposure metric that is the foundation of the proposed warrant. A novelty is that if a signal is installed at Location "A" (the nearby intersection), it is based on the risk exposure at Location "B" (the approach crossing the track). The proposed warrant includes adjustment factors for train frequency, percentage of tractor-trailers on the minor approach, and vehicle occupancy (e.g. buses) on the same approach, and advises that alternatives such as providing a path for evasive maneuver and re-designation of the major/minor streets be considered prior to the signal alternative. A validation phase, not reported herein but contained in the project report, solicited data from various jurisdictions, along with their professional judgment on whether a signal is needed (albeit recognizing there is no current applicable warrant). The responses were compared to whether the warrant as written would have been triggered, and good compliance between the proposed warrant and the professional opinion was obtained.

AB - NCHRP funded a study of whether a traffic signal warrant for intersections near railroad at-grade crossings can and should be developed. The work was done under NCHRP 3-76A, and resulted in a proposed Warrant 9 to be added to the next edition of the MUTCD. This followed review and endorsement by the NCUTCD and its Task Forces. This paper presents the approach used in that work, with emphasis on the selection of a fatality-based risk exposure metric that is the foundation of the proposed warrant. A novelty is that if a signal is installed at Location "A" (the nearby intersection), it is based on the risk exposure at Location "B" (the approach crossing the track). The proposed warrant includes adjustment factors for train frequency, percentage of tractor-trailers on the minor approach, and vehicle occupancy (e.g. buses) on the same approach, and advises that alternatives such as providing a path for evasive maneuver and re-designation of the major/minor streets be considered prior to the signal alternative. A validation phase, not reported herein but contained in the project report, solicited data from various jurisdictions, along with their professional judgment on whether a signal is needed (albeit recognizing there is no current applicable warrant). The responses were compared to whether the warrant as written would have been triggered, and good compliance between the proposed warrant and the professional opinion was obtained.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873508329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873508329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781622761883

SP - 88

EP - 101

BT - Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2008

ER -