Development and Validation of the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale

Lisa A. Marchiondo, Ernest Gonzales, Shan Ran

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Purpose: Workplace age discrimination research is proliferating, but researchers lack a valid measure with which to capture targets’ discriminatory experiences. We developed a measure of perceived workplace age discrimination that assesses overt and covert forms of discrimination and then compared older, middle-aged, and younger workers’ experiences. Design/Methodology: In Study 1, we developed the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale (WADS) based on older workers’ experiences using a deductive approach, a qualitative study, and two quantitative surveys. In Study 2, we validated the measure among young employees using a qualitative and two quantitative surveys. In Study 3, we tested the WADS among middle-aged workers and tested models of invariance between age groups. Findings: Participants frequently endorsed covert discriminatory experiences, which the WADS reflects. The WADS contains convergent and discriminant validity, high reliability, and a unidimensional structure across age groups. It demonstrates criterion-related validity among older and younger workers but not middle-aged workers, given their low experiences of age discrimination. Age discrimination frequency follows a U-shaped pattern across age groups. Implications: Researchers can use the WADS to identify long-term outcomes of age discrimination and to further compare workers’ discriminatory experiences. Practitioners and policymakers can use the measure to develop interventions to ameliorate workplace age discrimination and inform policymaking. Originality/Value: The WADS is the first validated measure of targets’ perspectives of workplace age discrimination. Our results challenge assumptions that only older workers experience age discrimination (younger workers’ means were highest) and that age discrimination is usually overt in nature (it is often covert).

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)493-513
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Business and Psychology
    Volume31
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Ageism
    Workplace
    Age Groups
    Work place
    Age discrimination
    Research Personnel

    Keywords

    • Age discrimination
    • Ageism
    • Measurement
    • Middle-aged workers
    • Modern discrimination
    • Older workers
    • Young workers

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Business and International Management
    • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
    • Applied Psychology
    • Psychology(all)

    Cite this

    Development and Validation of the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale. / Marchiondo, Lisa A.; Gonzales, Ernest; Ran, Shan.

    In: Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 493-513.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Marchiondo, Lisa A. ; Gonzales, Ernest ; Ran, Shan. / Development and Validation of the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale. In: Journal of Business and Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 493-513.
    @article{80c9599328374fa4b13da1976cfbc84e,
    title = "Development and Validation of the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale",
    abstract = "Purpose: Workplace age discrimination research is proliferating, but researchers lack a valid measure with which to capture targets’ discriminatory experiences. We developed a measure of perceived workplace age discrimination that assesses overt and covert forms of discrimination and then compared older, middle-aged, and younger workers’ experiences. Design/Methodology: In Study 1, we developed the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale (WADS) based on older workers’ experiences using a deductive approach, a qualitative study, and two quantitative surveys. In Study 2, we validated the measure among young employees using a qualitative and two quantitative surveys. In Study 3, we tested the WADS among middle-aged workers and tested models of invariance between age groups. Findings: Participants frequently endorsed covert discriminatory experiences, which the WADS reflects. The WADS contains convergent and discriminant validity, high reliability, and a unidimensional structure across age groups. It demonstrates criterion-related validity among older and younger workers but not middle-aged workers, given their low experiences of age discrimination. Age discrimination frequency follows a U-shaped pattern across age groups. Implications: Researchers can use the WADS to identify long-term outcomes of age discrimination and to further compare workers’ discriminatory experiences. Practitioners and policymakers can use the measure to develop interventions to ameliorate workplace age discrimination and inform policymaking. Originality/Value: The WADS is the first validated measure of targets’ perspectives of workplace age discrimination. Our results challenge assumptions that only older workers experience age discrimination (younger workers’ means were highest) and that age discrimination is usually overt in nature (it is often covert).",
    keywords = "Age discrimination, Ageism, Measurement, Middle-aged workers, Modern discrimination, Older workers, Young workers",
    author = "Marchiondo, {Lisa A.} and Ernest Gonzales and Shan Ran",
    year = "2016",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s10869-015-9425-6",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "493--513",
    journal = "Journal of Business and Psychology",
    issn = "0889-3268",
    publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Development and Validation of the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale

    AU - Marchiondo, Lisa A.

    AU - Gonzales, Ernest

    AU - Ran, Shan

    PY - 2016/12/1

    Y1 - 2016/12/1

    N2 - Purpose: Workplace age discrimination research is proliferating, but researchers lack a valid measure with which to capture targets’ discriminatory experiences. We developed a measure of perceived workplace age discrimination that assesses overt and covert forms of discrimination and then compared older, middle-aged, and younger workers’ experiences. Design/Methodology: In Study 1, we developed the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale (WADS) based on older workers’ experiences using a deductive approach, a qualitative study, and two quantitative surveys. In Study 2, we validated the measure among young employees using a qualitative and two quantitative surveys. In Study 3, we tested the WADS among middle-aged workers and tested models of invariance between age groups. Findings: Participants frequently endorsed covert discriminatory experiences, which the WADS reflects. The WADS contains convergent and discriminant validity, high reliability, and a unidimensional structure across age groups. It demonstrates criterion-related validity among older and younger workers but not middle-aged workers, given their low experiences of age discrimination. Age discrimination frequency follows a U-shaped pattern across age groups. Implications: Researchers can use the WADS to identify long-term outcomes of age discrimination and to further compare workers’ discriminatory experiences. Practitioners and policymakers can use the measure to develop interventions to ameliorate workplace age discrimination and inform policymaking. Originality/Value: The WADS is the first validated measure of targets’ perspectives of workplace age discrimination. Our results challenge assumptions that only older workers experience age discrimination (younger workers’ means were highest) and that age discrimination is usually overt in nature (it is often covert).

    AB - Purpose: Workplace age discrimination research is proliferating, but researchers lack a valid measure with which to capture targets’ discriminatory experiences. We developed a measure of perceived workplace age discrimination that assesses overt and covert forms of discrimination and then compared older, middle-aged, and younger workers’ experiences. Design/Methodology: In Study 1, we developed the Workplace Age Discrimination Scale (WADS) based on older workers’ experiences using a deductive approach, a qualitative study, and two quantitative surveys. In Study 2, we validated the measure among young employees using a qualitative and two quantitative surveys. In Study 3, we tested the WADS among middle-aged workers and tested models of invariance between age groups. Findings: Participants frequently endorsed covert discriminatory experiences, which the WADS reflects. The WADS contains convergent and discriminant validity, high reliability, and a unidimensional structure across age groups. It demonstrates criterion-related validity among older and younger workers but not middle-aged workers, given their low experiences of age discrimination. Age discrimination frequency follows a U-shaped pattern across age groups. Implications: Researchers can use the WADS to identify long-term outcomes of age discrimination and to further compare workers’ discriminatory experiences. Practitioners and policymakers can use the measure to develop interventions to ameliorate workplace age discrimination and inform policymaking. Originality/Value: The WADS is the first validated measure of targets’ perspectives of workplace age discrimination. Our results challenge assumptions that only older workers experience age discrimination (younger workers’ means were highest) and that age discrimination is usually overt in nature (it is often covert).

    KW - Age discrimination

    KW - Ageism

    KW - Measurement

    KW - Middle-aged workers

    KW - Modern discrimination

    KW - Older workers

    KW - Young workers

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949498452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949498452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s10869-015-9425-6

    DO - 10.1007/s10869-015-9425-6

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84949498452

    VL - 31

    SP - 493

    EP - 513

    JO - Journal of Business and Psychology

    JF - Journal of Business and Psychology

    SN - 0889-3268

    IS - 4

    ER -