Development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological faculty

Ashley Leak Bryant, Abraham Brody, Adriana Perez, Casey Shillam, Linda S. Edelman, Stewart M. Bond, Victoria Foster, Elena O. Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The Hartford Gerontological Nursing Leaders (HGNL) formerly known as the Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity Initiative (BAGNC), in conjunction with the National Hartford Centers of Gerontological Nursing Excellence (NHCGNE), developed and executed a peer mentoring program beginning in 2011 to enhance both (a) the experience of newly selected scholars and fellows to the NHCGNE and (b) the ongoing professional development of HGNL members. The purpose of this article is to describe key strategies used to develop and execute the peer mentoring program and to present formative program evaluation. Design: The program was launched in January 2011 with seven peer mentor and mentee matches. In June 2012, the peer mentoring committee solicited feedback on the development of the peer mentoring program and changes were made for the subsequent cohorts. Findings: An additional 12 matches were made in the following 2 years (2012 and 2013), for a total of 31 matches to date. We have learned several key lessons from our three cohorts regarding how to structure, implement, and carefully evaluate a peer mentoring program. Conclusions: Informal evaluation of our peer mentoring program noted several challenges for both peer mentors and mentees. Having knowledge of and addressing those challenges may increase the overall quality and effectiveness of peer mentoring programs and, in turn, benefit academic nursing by strengthening the faculty workforce. Clinical Relevance: Findings from development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for gerontological faculty could lead to new and adaptable programs in a variety of clinical and education settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)258-266
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nursing Scholarship
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Nursing
Mentors
Geriatric Nursing
Nursing Faculties
Mentoring
Program Evaluation
Education

Keywords

  • Early career faculty
  • Gerontological nursing
  • Hartford Gerontological Nursing Leaders
  • Mentorship
  • Peer mentoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological faculty. / Bryant, Ashley Leak; Brody, Abraham; Perez, Adriana; Shillam, Casey; Edelman, Linda S.; Bond, Stewart M.; Foster, Victoria; Siegel, Elena O.

In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 47, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 258-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bryant, AL, Brody, A, Perez, A, Shillam, C, Edelman, LS, Bond, SM, Foster, V & Siegel, EO 2015, 'Development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological faculty', Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 258-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12135
Bryant, Ashley Leak ; Brody, Abraham ; Perez, Adriana ; Shillam, Casey ; Edelman, Linda S. ; Bond, Stewart M. ; Foster, Victoria ; Siegel, Elena O. / Development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological faculty. In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2015 ; Vol. 47, No. 3. pp. 258-266.
@article{c5607b77d9c34b74b1e207c630c24e1d,
title = "Development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological faculty",
abstract = "Purpose: The Hartford Gerontological Nursing Leaders (HGNL) formerly known as the Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity Initiative (BAGNC), in conjunction with the National Hartford Centers of Gerontological Nursing Excellence (NHCGNE), developed and executed a peer mentoring program beginning in 2011 to enhance both (a) the experience of newly selected scholars and fellows to the NHCGNE and (b) the ongoing professional development of HGNL members. The purpose of this article is to describe key strategies used to develop and execute the peer mentoring program and to present formative program evaluation. Design: The program was launched in January 2011 with seven peer mentor and mentee matches. In June 2012, the peer mentoring committee solicited feedback on the development of the peer mentoring program and changes were made for the subsequent cohorts. Findings: An additional 12 matches were made in the following 2 years (2012 and 2013), for a total of 31 matches to date. We have learned several key lessons from our three cohorts regarding how to structure, implement, and carefully evaluate a peer mentoring program. Conclusions: Informal evaluation of our peer mentoring program noted several challenges for both peer mentors and mentees. Having knowledge of and addressing those challenges may increase the overall quality and effectiveness of peer mentoring programs and, in turn, benefit academic nursing by strengthening the faculty workforce. Clinical Relevance: Findings from development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for gerontological faculty could lead to new and adaptable programs in a variety of clinical and education settings.",
keywords = "Early career faculty, Gerontological nursing, Hartford Gerontological Nursing Leaders, Mentorship, Peer mentoring",
author = "Bryant, {Ashley Leak} and Abraham Brody and Adriana Perez and Casey Shillam and Edelman, {Linda S.} and Bond, {Stewart M.} and Victoria Foster and Siegel, {Elena O.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jnu.12135",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "258--266",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Scholarship",
issn = "1527-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological faculty

AU - Bryant, Ashley Leak

AU - Brody, Abraham

AU - Perez, Adriana

AU - Shillam, Casey

AU - Edelman, Linda S.

AU - Bond, Stewart M.

AU - Foster, Victoria

AU - Siegel, Elena O.

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Purpose: The Hartford Gerontological Nursing Leaders (HGNL) formerly known as the Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity Initiative (BAGNC), in conjunction with the National Hartford Centers of Gerontological Nursing Excellence (NHCGNE), developed and executed a peer mentoring program beginning in 2011 to enhance both (a) the experience of newly selected scholars and fellows to the NHCGNE and (b) the ongoing professional development of HGNL members. The purpose of this article is to describe key strategies used to develop and execute the peer mentoring program and to present formative program evaluation. Design: The program was launched in January 2011 with seven peer mentor and mentee matches. In June 2012, the peer mentoring committee solicited feedback on the development of the peer mentoring program and changes were made for the subsequent cohorts. Findings: An additional 12 matches were made in the following 2 years (2012 and 2013), for a total of 31 matches to date. We have learned several key lessons from our three cohorts regarding how to structure, implement, and carefully evaluate a peer mentoring program. Conclusions: Informal evaluation of our peer mentoring program noted several challenges for both peer mentors and mentees. Having knowledge of and addressing those challenges may increase the overall quality and effectiveness of peer mentoring programs and, in turn, benefit academic nursing by strengthening the faculty workforce. Clinical Relevance: Findings from development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for gerontological faculty could lead to new and adaptable programs in a variety of clinical and education settings.

AB - Purpose: The Hartford Gerontological Nursing Leaders (HGNL) formerly known as the Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity Initiative (BAGNC), in conjunction with the National Hartford Centers of Gerontological Nursing Excellence (NHCGNE), developed and executed a peer mentoring program beginning in 2011 to enhance both (a) the experience of newly selected scholars and fellows to the NHCGNE and (b) the ongoing professional development of HGNL members. The purpose of this article is to describe key strategies used to develop and execute the peer mentoring program and to present formative program evaluation. Design: The program was launched in January 2011 with seven peer mentor and mentee matches. In June 2012, the peer mentoring committee solicited feedback on the development of the peer mentoring program and changes were made for the subsequent cohorts. Findings: An additional 12 matches were made in the following 2 years (2012 and 2013), for a total of 31 matches to date. We have learned several key lessons from our three cohorts regarding how to structure, implement, and carefully evaluate a peer mentoring program. Conclusions: Informal evaluation of our peer mentoring program noted several challenges for both peer mentors and mentees. Having knowledge of and addressing those challenges may increase the overall quality and effectiveness of peer mentoring programs and, in turn, benefit academic nursing by strengthening the faculty workforce. Clinical Relevance: Findings from development and implementation of a peer mentoring program for gerontological faculty could lead to new and adaptable programs in a variety of clinical and education settings.

KW - Early career faculty

KW - Gerontological nursing

KW - Hartford Gerontological Nursing Leaders

KW - Mentorship

KW - Peer mentoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928757623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928757623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jnu.12135

DO - 10.1111/jnu.12135

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 258

EP - 266

JO - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

JF - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

SN - 1527-6546

IS - 3

ER -