Destination effects: Residential mobility and trajectories of adolescent violence in a stratified metropolis

Patrick Sharkey, Robert J. Sampson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two landmark policy interventions to improve the lives of youth through neighborhood mobility-the Gautreaux program in Chicago and the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiments in five cities-have produced conflicting results and have created a puzzle with broad implications: Do residential moves between neighborhoods increase or decrease violence, or both? To address this question, we analyze data from a subsample of adolescents ages 9-12 years from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, a longitudinal study of children and their families that began in Chicago-the site of the original Gautreaux program and one of the MTO experiments. We propose a dynamic modeling strategy to separate the effects of residential moving across three waves of the study from dimensions of neighborhood change and metropolitan location. The results reveal countervailing effects of mobility on trajectories of violence; whereas neighborhood moves within Chicago lead to an increased risk of violence, moves outside the city reduce violent offending and exposure to violence. The gap in violence between movers within and outside Chicago is explained not only by the racial and economic composition of the destination neighborhoods but also by the quality of school contexts, adolescents' perceived control over their new environment, and fear. These findings highlight the need to simultaneously consider residential mobility, mechanisms of neighborhood change, and the wider geography of structural opportunity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-681
Number of pages43
JournalCriminology
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Population Dynamics
metropolis
Violence
violence
adolescent
Geography
experiment
Human Development
Fear
Longitudinal Studies
longitudinal study
Economics
geography
anxiety
school
economics

Keywords

  • Neighborhoods
  • Residential mobility
  • Violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Destination effects : Residential mobility and trajectories of adolescent violence in a stratified metropolis. / Sharkey, Patrick; Sampson, Robert J.

In: Criminology, Vol. 48, No. 3, 08.2010, p. 639-681.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{060b60921ddc489ca9035b536b10c8fe,
title = "Destination effects: Residential mobility and trajectories of adolescent violence in a stratified metropolis",
abstract = "Two landmark policy interventions to improve the lives of youth through neighborhood mobility-the Gautreaux program in Chicago and the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiments in five cities-have produced conflicting results and have created a puzzle with broad implications: Do residential moves between neighborhoods increase or decrease violence, or both? To address this question, we analyze data from a subsample of adolescents ages 9-12 years from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, a longitudinal study of children and their families that began in Chicago-the site of the original Gautreaux program and one of the MTO experiments. We propose a dynamic modeling strategy to separate the effects of residential moving across three waves of the study from dimensions of neighborhood change and metropolitan location. The results reveal countervailing effects of mobility on trajectories of violence; whereas neighborhood moves within Chicago lead to an increased risk of violence, moves outside the city reduce violent offending and exposure to violence. The gap in violence between movers within and outside Chicago is explained not only by the racial and economic composition of the destination neighborhoods but also by the quality of school contexts, adolescents' perceived control over their new environment, and fear. These findings highlight the need to simultaneously consider residential mobility, mechanisms of neighborhood change, and the wider geography of structural opportunity.",
keywords = "Neighborhoods, Residential mobility, Violence",
author = "Patrick Sharkey and Sampson, {Robert J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00198.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "639--681",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Destination effects

T2 - Residential mobility and trajectories of adolescent violence in a stratified metropolis

AU - Sharkey, Patrick

AU - Sampson, Robert J.

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Two landmark policy interventions to improve the lives of youth through neighborhood mobility-the Gautreaux program in Chicago and the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiments in five cities-have produced conflicting results and have created a puzzle with broad implications: Do residential moves between neighborhoods increase or decrease violence, or both? To address this question, we analyze data from a subsample of adolescents ages 9-12 years from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, a longitudinal study of children and their families that began in Chicago-the site of the original Gautreaux program and one of the MTO experiments. We propose a dynamic modeling strategy to separate the effects of residential moving across three waves of the study from dimensions of neighborhood change and metropolitan location. The results reveal countervailing effects of mobility on trajectories of violence; whereas neighborhood moves within Chicago lead to an increased risk of violence, moves outside the city reduce violent offending and exposure to violence. The gap in violence between movers within and outside Chicago is explained not only by the racial and economic composition of the destination neighborhoods but also by the quality of school contexts, adolescents' perceived control over their new environment, and fear. These findings highlight the need to simultaneously consider residential mobility, mechanisms of neighborhood change, and the wider geography of structural opportunity.

AB - Two landmark policy interventions to improve the lives of youth through neighborhood mobility-the Gautreaux program in Chicago and the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiments in five cities-have produced conflicting results and have created a puzzle with broad implications: Do residential moves between neighborhoods increase or decrease violence, or both? To address this question, we analyze data from a subsample of adolescents ages 9-12 years from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, a longitudinal study of children and their families that began in Chicago-the site of the original Gautreaux program and one of the MTO experiments. We propose a dynamic modeling strategy to separate the effects of residential moving across three waves of the study from dimensions of neighborhood change and metropolitan location. The results reveal countervailing effects of mobility on trajectories of violence; whereas neighborhood moves within Chicago lead to an increased risk of violence, moves outside the city reduce violent offending and exposure to violence. The gap in violence between movers within and outside Chicago is explained not only by the racial and economic composition of the destination neighborhoods but also by the quality of school contexts, adolescents' perceived control over their new environment, and fear. These findings highlight the need to simultaneously consider residential mobility, mechanisms of neighborhood change, and the wider geography of structural opportunity.

KW - Neighborhoods

KW - Residential mobility

KW - Violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955747032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955747032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00198.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00198.x

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 639

EP - 681

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 3

ER -