Designing humans: A human rights approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Advances in genomic technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9, mitochondrial replacement techniques, and in vitro gametogenesis may soon give us more precise and efficient tools to have children with certain traits such as beauty, intelligence, and athleticism. In this paper, I propose a new approach to the ethics of reproductive genetic engineering, a human rights approach. This approach relies on two claims that have certain, independent plausibility: (a) human beings have equal moral status, and (b) human beings have human rights to the fundamental conditions for pursuing a good life. I first argue that the human rights approach gives us a lower bound of when reproductive genetic engineering would be permissible. I then compare this approach with other approaches such as the libertarian, perfectionist, and life worth living approaches. Against these approaches, I argue that the human rights approach offers a novel, and more plausible, way of assessing the ethics of reproductive genetic engineering.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBioethics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

genetic engineering
Genetic Engineering
human rights
Ethics
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
moral philosophy
Gametogenesis
Beauty
human being
beauty
Intelligence
intelligence
Technology
Human Rights

Keywords

  • CRISPR
  • designer babies
  • gene editing
  • gene therapy
  • genetic enhancement
  • reproductive genetic engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Designing humans : A human rights approach. / Liao, S. Matthew.

In: Bioethics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{19a8266da713479eb1903ddf3f2a6787,
title = "Designing humans: A human rights approach",
abstract = "Advances in genomic technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9, mitochondrial replacement techniques, and in vitro gametogenesis may soon give us more precise and efficient tools to have children with certain traits such as beauty, intelligence, and athleticism. In this paper, I propose a new approach to the ethics of reproductive genetic engineering, a human rights approach. This approach relies on two claims that have certain, independent plausibility: (a) human beings have equal moral status, and (b) human beings have human rights to the fundamental conditions for pursuing a good life. I first argue that the human rights approach gives us a lower bound of when reproductive genetic engineering would be permissible. I then compare this approach with other approaches such as the libertarian, perfectionist, and life worth living approaches. Against these approaches, I argue that the human rights approach offers a novel, and more plausible, way of assessing the ethics of reproductive genetic engineering.",
keywords = "CRISPR, designer babies, gene editing, gene therapy, genetic enhancement, reproductive genetic engineering",
author = "Liao, {S. Matthew}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bioe.12519",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Bioethics",
issn = "0269-9702",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designing humans

T2 - A human rights approach

AU - Liao, S. Matthew

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Advances in genomic technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9, mitochondrial replacement techniques, and in vitro gametogenesis may soon give us more precise and efficient tools to have children with certain traits such as beauty, intelligence, and athleticism. In this paper, I propose a new approach to the ethics of reproductive genetic engineering, a human rights approach. This approach relies on two claims that have certain, independent plausibility: (a) human beings have equal moral status, and (b) human beings have human rights to the fundamental conditions for pursuing a good life. I first argue that the human rights approach gives us a lower bound of when reproductive genetic engineering would be permissible. I then compare this approach with other approaches such as the libertarian, perfectionist, and life worth living approaches. Against these approaches, I argue that the human rights approach offers a novel, and more plausible, way of assessing the ethics of reproductive genetic engineering.

AB - Advances in genomic technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9, mitochondrial replacement techniques, and in vitro gametogenesis may soon give us more precise and efficient tools to have children with certain traits such as beauty, intelligence, and athleticism. In this paper, I propose a new approach to the ethics of reproductive genetic engineering, a human rights approach. This approach relies on two claims that have certain, independent plausibility: (a) human beings have equal moral status, and (b) human beings have human rights to the fundamental conditions for pursuing a good life. I first argue that the human rights approach gives us a lower bound of when reproductive genetic engineering would be permissible. I then compare this approach with other approaches such as the libertarian, perfectionist, and life worth living approaches. Against these approaches, I argue that the human rights approach offers a novel, and more plausible, way of assessing the ethics of reproductive genetic engineering.

KW - CRISPR

KW - designer babies

KW - gene editing

KW - gene therapy

KW - genetic enhancement

KW - reproductive genetic engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054921572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054921572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bioe.12519

DO - 10.1111/bioe.12519

M3 - Article

C2 - 30311673

AN - SCOPUS:85054921572

JO - Bioethics

JF - Bioethics

SN - 0269-9702

ER -