Democracy and education spending in africa

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

While it is widely believed that electoral competition influences public spending decisions, there has been relatively little effort to examine how recent democratization in the developing world has resulted in changes in basic service provision. There have been even fewer attempts to investigate whether democracy matters for public spending in the poorest developing countries, where "weak institutions" may mean that the formal adoption of electoral competition has little effect on policy. In this article I confront these questions directly, asking whether the shift to multiparty competition in African countries has resulted in increased spending on primary education. I develop an argument, illustrated with a game-theoretic model, which suggests that the need to obtain an electoral majority may have prompted African governments to spend more on education and to prioritize primary schools over universities within the education budget. I test three propositions from the model using panel data on electoral competition and education spending in African countries. I find clear evidence that democratically elected African governments have spent more on primary education, while spending on universities appears unaffected by democratization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-358
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

democracy
public spending
primary education
democratization
education
university
primary school
budget
developing country
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Democracy and education spending in africa. / Stasavage, David.

In: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 49, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 343-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{5aba821bb60747a696302e72e13d89b6,
title = "Democracy and education spending in africa",
abstract = "While it is widely believed that electoral competition influences public spending decisions, there has been relatively little effort to examine how recent democratization in the developing world has resulted in changes in basic service provision. There have been even fewer attempts to investigate whether democracy matters for public spending in the poorest developing countries, where {"}weak institutions{"} may mean that the formal adoption of electoral competition has little effect on policy. In this article I confront these questions directly, asking whether the shift to multiparty competition in African countries has resulted in increased spending on primary education. I develop an argument, illustrated with a game-theoretic model, which suggests that the need to obtain an electoral majority may have prompted African governments to spend more on education and to prioritize primary schools over universities within the education budget. I test three propositions from the model using panel data on electoral competition and education spending in African countries. I find clear evidence that democratically elected African governments have spent more on primary education, while spending on universities appears unaffected by democratization.",
author = "David Stasavage",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00127.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "343--358",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Democracy and education spending in africa

AU - Stasavage, David

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - While it is widely believed that electoral competition influences public spending decisions, there has been relatively little effort to examine how recent democratization in the developing world has resulted in changes in basic service provision. There have been even fewer attempts to investigate whether democracy matters for public spending in the poorest developing countries, where "weak institutions" may mean that the formal adoption of electoral competition has little effect on policy. In this article I confront these questions directly, asking whether the shift to multiparty competition in African countries has resulted in increased spending on primary education. I develop an argument, illustrated with a game-theoretic model, which suggests that the need to obtain an electoral majority may have prompted African governments to spend more on education and to prioritize primary schools over universities within the education budget. I test three propositions from the model using panel data on electoral competition and education spending in African countries. I find clear evidence that democratically elected African governments have spent more on primary education, while spending on universities appears unaffected by democratization.

AB - While it is widely believed that electoral competition influences public spending decisions, there has been relatively little effort to examine how recent democratization in the developing world has resulted in changes in basic service provision. There have been even fewer attempts to investigate whether democracy matters for public spending in the poorest developing countries, where "weak institutions" may mean that the formal adoption of electoral competition has little effect on policy. In this article I confront these questions directly, asking whether the shift to multiparty competition in African countries has resulted in increased spending on primary education. I develop an argument, illustrated with a game-theoretic model, which suggests that the need to obtain an electoral majority may have prompted African governments to spend more on education and to prioritize primary schools over universities within the education budget. I test three propositions from the model using panel data on electoral competition and education spending in African countries. I find clear evidence that democratically elected African governments have spent more on primary education, while spending on universities appears unaffected by democratization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744566116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744566116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00127.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00127.x

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:27744566116

VL - 49

SP - 343

EP - 358

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

IS - 2

ER -