Comment promouvoir la délibération démocratique? Priorité du débat contradictoire sur la discussion

Translated title of the contribution: Deliberation: Why we should focus on debate rather than discussion

Bernard Manin, Marc Saint-Upery

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article argues that in order to foster democratic deliberation, adversarial debates should be promoted rather than discussion. Discussion, in which participants talk to and answer each other, can have detrimental consequences, even when it is strictly argumentative. The article analyses the psychological and social mechanisms that can lead to such undesirable results. The worth of democratic deliberation comes from the exchange of arguments for and against a certain course of action, and the weighting of the opposing reasons. The article thus defends a different perspective on democratic deliberation than the dominant one.

    Original languageFrench
    Pages (from-to)83-113
    Number of pages31
    JournalRaisons Politiques
    Volume42
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    deliberation
    weighting

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Political Science and International Relations
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Comment promouvoir la délibération démocratique? Priorité du débat contradictoire sur la discussion. / Manin, Bernard; Saint-Upery, Marc.

    In: Raisons Politiques, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2011, p. 83-113.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{6795540dbde8446f9ca3da5cd0a3a4f6,
    title = "Comment promouvoir la d{\'e}lib{\'e}ration d{\'e}mocratique? Priorit{\'e} du d{\'e}bat contradictoire sur la discussion",
    abstract = "This article argues that in order to foster democratic deliberation, adversarial debates should be promoted rather than discussion. Discussion, in which participants talk to and answer each other, can have detrimental consequences, even when it is strictly argumentative. The article analyses the psychological and social mechanisms that can lead to such undesirable results. The worth of democratic deliberation comes from the exchange of arguments for and against a certain course of action, and the weighting of the opposing reasons. The article thus defends a different perspective on democratic deliberation than the dominant one.",
    author = "Bernard Manin and Marc Saint-Upery",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.3917/rai.042.0083",
    language = "French",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "83--113",
    journal = "Raisons Politiques",
    issn = "1291-1941",
    publisher = "Presses de Sciences Po",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comment promouvoir la délibération démocratique? Priorité du débat contradictoire sur la discussion

    AU - Manin, Bernard

    AU - Saint-Upery, Marc

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - This article argues that in order to foster democratic deliberation, adversarial debates should be promoted rather than discussion. Discussion, in which participants talk to and answer each other, can have detrimental consequences, even when it is strictly argumentative. The article analyses the psychological and social mechanisms that can lead to such undesirable results. The worth of democratic deliberation comes from the exchange of arguments for and against a certain course of action, and the weighting of the opposing reasons. The article thus defends a different perspective on democratic deliberation than the dominant one.

    AB - This article argues that in order to foster democratic deliberation, adversarial debates should be promoted rather than discussion. Discussion, in which participants talk to and answer each other, can have detrimental consequences, even when it is strictly argumentative. The article analyses the psychological and social mechanisms that can lead to such undesirable results. The worth of democratic deliberation comes from the exchange of arguments for and against a certain course of action, and the weighting of the opposing reasons. The article thus defends a different perspective on democratic deliberation than the dominant one.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960763099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960763099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3917/rai.042.0083

    DO - 10.3917/rai.042.0083

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    SP - 83

    EP - 113

    JO - Raisons Politiques

    JF - Raisons Politiques

    SN - 1291-1941

    IS - 2

    ER -