Deducing preferences and choices in the 1980 presidential election

Steven Brams, Peter C. Fishburn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    A rational-choice model of voting behavior provides a framework for statistically estimating the numbers of voters who had each of twelve possible strict and nonstrict preference orders for the three major candidates in the 1980 presidential election. These estimates, based upon explicit assumptions about voting behavior, lead to a number of deductions not obtained in previous studies that have defined rationality in terms of 'issue voting'. Among other results, John Anderson is found to have both first-place and residual support far in excess of his popular-vote showing, from which it is inferred that he would have seriously challenged the major-party candidates under approval voting. Yet, there is not strong evidence that voter's preferences were single-peaked, with Anderson perceived as the candidate in the middle on a left-right ideological scale.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)333-346
    Number of pages14
    JournalElectoral Studies
    Volume1
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1982

    Fingerprint

    presidential election
    candidacy
    voting behavior
    voting
    voter
    deduction
    rationality
    evidence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Political Science and International Relations

    Cite this

    Deducing preferences and choices in the 1980 presidential election. / Brams, Steven; Fishburn, Peter C.

    In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1982, p. 333-346.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Brams, Steven ; Fishburn, Peter C. / Deducing preferences and choices in the 1980 presidential election. In: Electoral Studies. 1982 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 333-346.
    @article{6ca96e07313f489ea971ed72effcd4cd,
    title = "Deducing preferences and choices in the 1980 presidential election",
    abstract = "A rational-choice model of voting behavior provides a framework for statistically estimating the numbers of voters who had each of twelve possible strict and nonstrict preference orders for the three major candidates in the 1980 presidential election. These estimates, based upon explicit assumptions about voting behavior, lead to a number of deductions not obtained in previous studies that have defined rationality in terms of 'issue voting'. Among other results, John Anderson is found to have both first-place and residual support far in excess of his popular-vote showing, from which it is inferred that he would have seriously challenged the major-party candidates under approval voting. Yet, there is not strong evidence that voter's preferences were single-peaked, with Anderson perceived as the candidate in the middle on a left-right ideological scale.",
    author = "Steven Brams and Fishburn, {Peter C.}",
    year = "1982",
    doi = "10.1016/0261-3794(82)90222-0",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "333--346",
    journal = "Electoral Studies",
    issn = "0261-3794",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Deducing preferences and choices in the 1980 presidential election

    AU - Brams, Steven

    AU - Fishburn, Peter C.

    PY - 1982

    Y1 - 1982

    N2 - A rational-choice model of voting behavior provides a framework for statistically estimating the numbers of voters who had each of twelve possible strict and nonstrict preference orders for the three major candidates in the 1980 presidential election. These estimates, based upon explicit assumptions about voting behavior, lead to a number of deductions not obtained in previous studies that have defined rationality in terms of 'issue voting'. Among other results, John Anderson is found to have both first-place and residual support far in excess of his popular-vote showing, from which it is inferred that he would have seriously challenged the major-party candidates under approval voting. Yet, there is not strong evidence that voter's preferences were single-peaked, with Anderson perceived as the candidate in the middle on a left-right ideological scale.

    AB - A rational-choice model of voting behavior provides a framework for statistically estimating the numbers of voters who had each of twelve possible strict and nonstrict preference orders for the three major candidates in the 1980 presidential election. These estimates, based upon explicit assumptions about voting behavior, lead to a number of deductions not obtained in previous studies that have defined rationality in terms of 'issue voting'. Among other results, John Anderson is found to have both first-place and residual support far in excess of his popular-vote showing, from which it is inferred that he would have seriously challenged the major-party candidates under approval voting. Yet, there is not strong evidence that voter's preferences were single-peaked, with Anderson perceived as the candidate in the middle on a left-right ideological scale.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040138387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040138387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/0261-3794(82)90222-0

    DO - 10.1016/0261-3794(82)90222-0

    M3 - Article

    VL - 1

    SP - 333

    EP - 346

    JO - Electoral Studies

    JF - Electoral Studies

    SN - 0261-3794

    IS - 3

    ER -