Decomposing Gradience: Quantitative versus Qualitative Distinctions

Matthias Schlesewsky, Ina Bornkessel, Brian McElree

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter characterizes the critical phenomena from a behavioural perspective before turning to experimental methods, yielding more finegrained data. It examines how linguistic judgments emerge from the realtime comprehension processes by drawing upon studies of word order variation in German. Based on a number of empirical observations, it argues that gradient data need not be interpreted as evidence against categorical grammars. Instead, gradience can come from a complex interaction between grammar-internal requirements, processing mechanisms, general cognitive constraints, and the environment within which the judgment task is performed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780191705861, 0199274797, 9780199274796
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Gradience
Grammar
Experimental Method
Cognitive Constraints
Categorical
Interaction

Keywords

  • Categorical grammar
  • German
  • Gradience
  • Qualitative distinctions
  • Quantitative distinctions
  • Word order

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., & McElree, B. (2010). Decomposing Gradience: Quantitative versus Qualitative Distinctions. In Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0007

Decomposing Gradience : Quantitative versus Qualitative Distinctions. / Schlesewsky, Matthias; Bornkessel, Ina; McElree, Brian.

Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2010.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Schlesewsky, M, Bornkessel, I & McElree, B 2010, Decomposing Gradience: Quantitative versus Qualitative Distinctions. in Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0007
Schlesewsky M, Bornkessel I, McElree B. Decomposing Gradience: Quantitative versus Qualitative Distinctions. In Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives. Oxford University Press. 2010 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0007
Schlesewsky, Matthias ; Bornkessel, Ina ; McElree, Brian. / Decomposing Gradience : Quantitative versus Qualitative Distinctions. Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2010.
@inbook{efb8c8bc12d0470e9ce6372c6462a0ec,
title = "Decomposing Gradience: Quantitative versus Qualitative Distinctions",
abstract = "This chapter characterizes the critical phenomena from a behavioural perspective before turning to experimental methods, yielding more finegrained data. It examines how linguistic judgments emerge from the realtime comprehension processes by drawing upon studies of word order variation in German. Based on a number of empirical observations, it argues that gradient data need not be interpreted as evidence against categorical grammars. Instead, gradience can come from a complex interaction between grammar-internal requirements, processing mechanisms, general cognitive constraints, and the environment within which the judgment task is performed.",
keywords = "Categorical grammar, German, Gradience, Qualitative distinctions, Quantitative distinctions, Word order",
author = "Matthias Schlesewsky and Ina Bornkessel and Brian McElree",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780191705861",
booktitle = "Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Decomposing Gradience

T2 - Quantitative versus Qualitative Distinctions

AU - Schlesewsky, Matthias

AU - Bornkessel, Ina

AU - McElree, Brian

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - This chapter characterizes the critical phenomena from a behavioural perspective before turning to experimental methods, yielding more finegrained data. It examines how linguistic judgments emerge from the realtime comprehension processes by drawing upon studies of word order variation in German. Based on a number of empirical observations, it argues that gradient data need not be interpreted as evidence against categorical grammars. Instead, gradience can come from a complex interaction between grammar-internal requirements, processing mechanisms, general cognitive constraints, and the environment within which the judgment task is performed.

AB - This chapter characterizes the critical phenomena from a behavioural perspective before turning to experimental methods, yielding more finegrained data. It examines how linguistic judgments emerge from the realtime comprehension processes by drawing upon studies of word order variation in German. Based on a number of empirical observations, it argues that gradient data need not be interpreted as evidence against categorical grammars. Instead, gradience can come from a complex interaction between grammar-internal requirements, processing mechanisms, general cognitive constraints, and the environment within which the judgment task is performed.

KW - Categorical grammar

KW - German

KW - Gradience

KW - Qualitative distinctions

KW - Quantitative distinctions

KW - Word order

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919848539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919848539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0007

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0007

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780191705861

SN - 0199274797

SN - 9780199274796

BT - Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -