Decoding "Us" and "Them"

Neural representations of generalized group concepts

Mina Cikara, Jay Van Bavel, Zachary A. Ingbretsen, Tatiana Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Humans form social coalitions in every society on earth, yet we know very little about how the general concepts us and them are represented in the brain. Evolutionary psychologists have argued that the human capacity for group affiliation is a byproduct of adaptations that evolved for tracking coalitions in general. These theories suggest that humans possess a common neural code for the concepts in-group and out-group, regardless of the category by which group boundaries are instantiated. The authors used multivoxel pattern analysis to identify the neural substrates of generalized group concept representations. They trained a classifier to encode how people represented the most basic instantiation of a specific social group (i.e., arbitrary teams created in the lab with no history of interaction or associated stereotypes) and tested how well the neural data decoded membership along an objectively orthogonal, real-world category (i.e., political parties). The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/middle cingulate cortex and anterior insula were associated with representing groups across multiple social categories. Restricting the analyses to these regions in a separate sample of participants performing an explicit categorization task, the authors replicated cross-categorization classification in anterior insula. Classification accuracy across categories was driven predominantly by the correct categorization of in-group targets, consistent with theories indicating in-group preference is more central than out-group derogation to group perception and cognition. These findings highlight the extent to which social group concepts rely on domain-general circuitry associated with encoding stimuli's functional significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-631
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume146
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Gyrus Cinguli
Cognition
Psychology
Brain
Decoding
Cortex
Insula
Social Groups

Keywords

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • Intergroup relations
  • Multi-voxel pattern analysis
  • Social categories

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Decoding "Us" and "Them" : Neural representations of generalized group concepts. / Cikara, Mina; Van Bavel, Jay; Ingbretsen, Zachary A.; Lau, Tatiana.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 146, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 621-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cikara, Mina ; Van Bavel, Jay ; Ingbretsen, Zachary A. ; Lau, Tatiana. / Decoding "Us" and "Them" : Neural representations of generalized group concepts. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2017 ; Vol. 146, No. 5. pp. 621-631.
@article{82a4181059544be3bbd33b0738fd37fe,
title = "Decoding {"}Us{"} and {"}Them{"}: Neural representations of generalized group concepts",
abstract = "Humans form social coalitions in every society on earth, yet we know very little about how the general concepts us and them are represented in the brain. Evolutionary psychologists have argued that the human capacity for group affiliation is a byproduct of adaptations that evolved for tracking coalitions in general. These theories suggest that humans possess a common neural code for the concepts in-group and out-group, regardless of the category by which group boundaries are instantiated. The authors used multivoxel pattern analysis to identify the neural substrates of generalized group concept representations. They trained a classifier to encode how people represented the most basic instantiation of a specific social group (i.e., arbitrary teams created in the lab with no history of interaction or associated stereotypes) and tested how well the neural data decoded membership along an objectively orthogonal, real-world category (i.e., political parties). The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/middle cingulate cortex and anterior insula were associated with representing groups across multiple social categories. Restricting the analyses to these regions in a separate sample of participants performing an explicit categorization task, the authors replicated cross-categorization classification in anterior insula. Classification accuracy across categories was driven predominantly by the correct categorization of in-group targets, consistent with theories indicating in-group preference is more central than out-group derogation to group perception and cognition. These findings highlight the extent to which social group concepts rely on domain-general circuitry associated with encoding stimuli's functional significance.",
keywords = "Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Intergroup relations, Multi-voxel pattern analysis, Social categories",
author = "Mina Cikara and {Van Bavel}, Jay and Ingbretsen, {Zachary A.} and Tatiana Lau",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/xge0000287",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "146",
pages = "621--631",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decoding "Us" and "Them"

T2 - Neural representations of generalized group concepts

AU - Cikara, Mina

AU - Van Bavel, Jay

AU - Ingbretsen, Zachary A.

AU - Lau, Tatiana

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Humans form social coalitions in every society on earth, yet we know very little about how the general concepts us and them are represented in the brain. Evolutionary psychologists have argued that the human capacity for group affiliation is a byproduct of adaptations that evolved for tracking coalitions in general. These theories suggest that humans possess a common neural code for the concepts in-group and out-group, regardless of the category by which group boundaries are instantiated. The authors used multivoxel pattern analysis to identify the neural substrates of generalized group concept representations. They trained a classifier to encode how people represented the most basic instantiation of a specific social group (i.e., arbitrary teams created in the lab with no history of interaction or associated stereotypes) and tested how well the neural data decoded membership along an objectively orthogonal, real-world category (i.e., political parties). The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/middle cingulate cortex and anterior insula were associated with representing groups across multiple social categories. Restricting the analyses to these regions in a separate sample of participants performing an explicit categorization task, the authors replicated cross-categorization classification in anterior insula. Classification accuracy across categories was driven predominantly by the correct categorization of in-group targets, consistent with theories indicating in-group preference is more central than out-group derogation to group perception and cognition. These findings highlight the extent to which social group concepts rely on domain-general circuitry associated with encoding stimuli's functional significance.

AB - Humans form social coalitions in every society on earth, yet we know very little about how the general concepts us and them are represented in the brain. Evolutionary psychologists have argued that the human capacity for group affiliation is a byproduct of adaptations that evolved for tracking coalitions in general. These theories suggest that humans possess a common neural code for the concepts in-group and out-group, regardless of the category by which group boundaries are instantiated. The authors used multivoxel pattern analysis to identify the neural substrates of generalized group concept representations. They trained a classifier to encode how people represented the most basic instantiation of a specific social group (i.e., arbitrary teams created in the lab with no history of interaction or associated stereotypes) and tested how well the neural data decoded membership along an objectively orthogonal, real-world category (i.e., political parties). The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/middle cingulate cortex and anterior insula were associated with representing groups across multiple social categories. Restricting the analyses to these regions in a separate sample of participants performing an explicit categorization task, the authors replicated cross-categorization classification in anterior insula. Classification accuracy across categories was driven predominantly by the correct categorization of in-group targets, consistent with theories indicating in-group preference is more central than out-group derogation to group perception and cognition. These findings highlight the extent to which social group concepts rely on domain-general circuitry associated with encoding stimuli's functional significance.

KW - Functional magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Intergroup relations

KW - Multi-voxel pattern analysis

KW - Social categories

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018971252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018971252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xge0000287

DO - 10.1037/xge0000287

M3 - Article

VL - 146

SP - 621

EP - 631

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 5

ER -