Decision Making through Integration of Sensory Evidence at Prolonged Timescales

Michael L. Waskom, Roozbeh Kiani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When multiple pieces of information bear on a decision, the best approach is to combine the evidence provided by each one. Evidence integration models formalize the computations underlying this process [1–3], explain human perceptual discrimination behavior [4–9], and correspond to neuronal responses elicited by discrimination tasks [10–14]. These findings suggest that evidence integration is key to understanding the neural basis of decision making [15–18]. But while evidence integration has most often been studied with simple tasks that limit deliberation to relatively brief periods, many natural decisions unfold over much longer durations. Neural network models imply acute limitations on the timescale of evidence integration [19–23], and it is currently unknown whether existing computational insights can generalize beyond rapid judgments. Here, we introduce a new psychophysical task and report model-based analyses of human behavior that demonstrate evidence integration at long timescales. Our task requires probabilistic inference using brief samples of visual evidence that are separated in time by long and unpredictable gaps. We show through several quantitative assays how decision making can approximate a normative integration process that extends over tens of seconds without accruing significant memory leak or noise. These results support the generalization of evidence integration models to a broader class of behaviors while posing new challenges for models of how these computations are implemented in biological networks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3850-3856.e9
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume28
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 3 2018

Fingerprint

decision making
Decision Making
Decision making
Neural Networks (Computer)
Noise
human behavior
neural networks
Assays
duration
Neural networks
Data storage equipment
assays
Discrimination (Psychology)
sampling
Generalization (Psychology)

Keywords

  • computational modeling
  • decision making
  • integration time constant
  • probabilistic inference
  • psychophysics
  • sequential sampling
  • working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Decision Making through Integration of Sensory Evidence at Prolonged Timescales. / Waskom, Michael L.; Kiani, Roozbeh.

In: Current Biology, Vol. 28, No. 23, 03.12.2018, p. 3850-3856.e9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce747b99af204bfeb7b4f84a7c4bd8d5,
title = "Decision Making through Integration of Sensory Evidence at Prolonged Timescales",
abstract = "When multiple pieces of information bear on a decision, the best approach is to combine the evidence provided by each one. Evidence integration models formalize the computations underlying this process [1–3], explain human perceptual discrimination behavior [4–9], and correspond to neuronal responses elicited by discrimination tasks [10–14]. These findings suggest that evidence integration is key to understanding the neural basis of decision making [15–18]. But while evidence integration has most often been studied with simple tasks that limit deliberation to relatively brief periods, many natural decisions unfold over much longer durations. Neural network models imply acute limitations on the timescale of evidence integration [19–23], and it is currently unknown whether existing computational insights can generalize beyond rapid judgments. Here, we introduce a new psychophysical task and report model-based analyses of human behavior that demonstrate evidence integration at long timescales. Our task requires probabilistic inference using brief samples of visual evidence that are separated in time by long and unpredictable gaps. We show through several quantitative assays how decision making can approximate a normative integration process that extends over tens of seconds without accruing significant memory leak or noise. These results support the generalization of evidence integration models to a broader class of behaviors while posing new challenges for models of how these computations are implemented in biological networks.",
keywords = "computational modeling, decision making, integration time constant, probabilistic inference, psychophysics, sequential sampling, working memory",
author = "Waskom, {Michael L.} and Roozbeh Kiani",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "3850--3856.e9",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision Making through Integration of Sensory Evidence at Prolonged Timescales

AU - Waskom, Michael L.

AU - Kiani, Roozbeh

PY - 2018/12/3

Y1 - 2018/12/3

N2 - When multiple pieces of information bear on a decision, the best approach is to combine the evidence provided by each one. Evidence integration models formalize the computations underlying this process [1–3], explain human perceptual discrimination behavior [4–9], and correspond to neuronal responses elicited by discrimination tasks [10–14]. These findings suggest that evidence integration is key to understanding the neural basis of decision making [15–18]. But while evidence integration has most often been studied with simple tasks that limit deliberation to relatively brief periods, many natural decisions unfold over much longer durations. Neural network models imply acute limitations on the timescale of evidence integration [19–23], and it is currently unknown whether existing computational insights can generalize beyond rapid judgments. Here, we introduce a new psychophysical task and report model-based analyses of human behavior that demonstrate evidence integration at long timescales. Our task requires probabilistic inference using brief samples of visual evidence that are separated in time by long and unpredictable gaps. We show through several quantitative assays how decision making can approximate a normative integration process that extends over tens of seconds without accruing significant memory leak or noise. These results support the generalization of evidence integration models to a broader class of behaviors while posing new challenges for models of how these computations are implemented in biological networks.

AB - When multiple pieces of information bear on a decision, the best approach is to combine the evidence provided by each one. Evidence integration models formalize the computations underlying this process [1–3], explain human perceptual discrimination behavior [4–9], and correspond to neuronal responses elicited by discrimination tasks [10–14]. These findings suggest that evidence integration is key to understanding the neural basis of decision making [15–18]. But while evidence integration has most often been studied with simple tasks that limit deliberation to relatively brief periods, many natural decisions unfold over much longer durations. Neural network models imply acute limitations on the timescale of evidence integration [19–23], and it is currently unknown whether existing computational insights can generalize beyond rapid judgments. Here, we introduce a new psychophysical task and report model-based analyses of human behavior that demonstrate evidence integration at long timescales. Our task requires probabilistic inference using brief samples of visual evidence that are separated in time by long and unpredictable gaps. We show through several quantitative assays how decision making can approximate a normative integration process that extends over tens of seconds without accruing significant memory leak or noise. These results support the generalization of evidence integration models to a broader class of behaviors while posing new challenges for models of how these computations are implemented in biological networks.

KW - computational modeling

KW - decision making

KW - integration time constant

KW - probabilistic inference

KW - psychophysics

KW - sequential sampling

KW - working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059321798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059321798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.021

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.021

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 3850-3856.e9

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 23

ER -