Debt, donors, and the decision to give

Thad Calabrese, Cleopatra Grizzle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the enormous size of the nonprofit sector, there has been very little empirical research done on the capital structure of nonprofit organizations, and no one has examined the potential effects of borrowing on individual contributions. Using a representative sample of nonprofits, the empirical analysis first determines whether secured or unsecured borrowing by nonprofits influence future contributions. The results for the full sample support a "crowding-out" effect. When the analysis is repeated on a subsample of nonprofits that are older, larger, and more dependent upon donations, the results are more ambiguous: secured debt has little or no effect, while unsecured debt has a "crowd-in" effect. The empirical analysis is then expanded to test whether nonprofits with higher than average debt levels have different results than nonprofits with below average debt levels. The results suggest that donors do remove future donations when a nonprofit is more highly leveraged compared to similar organizations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-254
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management
Volume24
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

indebtedness
donation
crowding out
non-profit sector
non-profit-organization
Debt
empirical research
Empirical analysis
Borrowing
Donation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

Debt, donors, and the decision to give. / Calabrese, Thad; Grizzle, Cleopatra.

In: Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2012, p. 221-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1cbe37def4a4418da3c578284d0634be,
title = "Debt, donors, and the decision to give",
abstract = "Despite the enormous size of the nonprofit sector, there has been very little empirical research done on the capital structure of nonprofit organizations, and no one has examined the potential effects of borrowing on individual contributions. Using a representative sample of nonprofits, the empirical analysis first determines whether secured or unsecured borrowing by nonprofits influence future contributions. The results for the full sample support a {"}crowding-out{"} effect. When the analysis is repeated on a subsample of nonprofits that are older, larger, and more dependent upon donations, the results are more ambiguous: secured debt has little or no effect, while unsecured debt has a {"}crowd-in{"} effect. The empirical analysis is then expanded to test whether nonprofits with higher than average debt levels have different results than nonprofits with below average debt levels. The results suggest that donors do remove future donations when a nonprofit is more highly leveraged compared to similar organizations.",
author = "Thad Calabrese and Cleopatra Grizzle",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "221--254",
journal = "Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management",
issn = "1096-3367",
publisher = "PrAcademics Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debt, donors, and the decision to give

AU - Calabrese, Thad

AU - Grizzle, Cleopatra

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Despite the enormous size of the nonprofit sector, there has been very little empirical research done on the capital structure of nonprofit organizations, and no one has examined the potential effects of borrowing on individual contributions. Using a representative sample of nonprofits, the empirical analysis first determines whether secured or unsecured borrowing by nonprofits influence future contributions. The results for the full sample support a "crowding-out" effect. When the analysis is repeated on a subsample of nonprofits that are older, larger, and more dependent upon donations, the results are more ambiguous: secured debt has little or no effect, while unsecured debt has a "crowd-in" effect. The empirical analysis is then expanded to test whether nonprofits with higher than average debt levels have different results than nonprofits with below average debt levels. The results suggest that donors do remove future donations when a nonprofit is more highly leveraged compared to similar organizations.

AB - Despite the enormous size of the nonprofit sector, there has been very little empirical research done on the capital structure of nonprofit organizations, and no one has examined the potential effects of borrowing on individual contributions. Using a representative sample of nonprofits, the empirical analysis first determines whether secured or unsecured borrowing by nonprofits influence future contributions. The results for the full sample support a "crowding-out" effect. When the analysis is repeated on a subsample of nonprofits that are older, larger, and more dependent upon donations, the results are more ambiguous: secured debt has little or no effect, while unsecured debt has a "crowd-in" effect. The empirical analysis is then expanded to test whether nonprofits with higher than average debt levels have different results than nonprofits with below average debt levels. The results suggest that donors do remove future donations when a nonprofit is more highly leveraged compared to similar organizations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930190130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930190130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 221

EP - 254

JO - Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management

JF - Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management

SN - 1096-3367

IS - 2

ER -