Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research

Roland Brünken, Jan Plass, Roxana Moreno

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The previous chapters have outlined the theoretical background, basic assumptions, and some key applications of Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) in its current state of development. The fundamental idea underlying CLT is that instructional design decisions should be informed by the architecture of the human cognitive system. CLT can therefore be described as a cognitive theory of instructional design. CLT has been very influential in educational research since the 1980s. It has inspired a growing number of research studies aimed at deriving empirically based guidelines for instructional design. Moreover, at its present stage of development, CLT is arguably one of the most influential instructional design theories. However, the extant research on cognitive load raises questions about the assumptions underlying CLT, some of which have not been consistently supported by the empirical data, suggesting the need to update the theory by incorporating recent empirical findings on cognition and learning (Schnotz & Kirschner, 2007). The first goal of this chapter is to summarize the theoretical developments of CLT and highlight some of its strengths and limitations. An additional contribution of CLT research includes efforts to develop practical, valid, and reliable measures of its main construct: cognitive load. However, as suggested in Chapter 9, the existing body of cognitive load research fails to exhibit methodological consistency regarding cognitive load measurement and lacks appropriate methods to measure other relevant constructs, such as the different load types proposed by the theory (DeLeeuw & Mayer, 2008).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCognitive Load Theory
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages253-272
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9780511844744
ISBN (Print)9780521860239
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Research
Cognition
Learning
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Brünken, R., Plass, J., & Moreno, R. (2010). Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. In Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 253-272). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.014

Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. / Brünken, Roland; Plass, Jan; Moreno, Roxana.

Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 253-272.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Brünken, R, Plass, J & Moreno, R 2010, Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. in Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press, pp. 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.014
Brünken R, Plass J, Moreno R. Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. In Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 253-272 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.014
Brünken, Roland ; Plass, Jan ; Moreno, Roxana. / Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 253-272
@inbook{a6decf01f05148aeacfa363cbcfd942d,
title = "Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research",
abstract = "The previous chapters have outlined the theoretical background, basic assumptions, and some key applications of Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) in its current state of development. The fundamental idea underlying CLT is that instructional design decisions should be informed by the architecture of the human cognitive system. CLT can therefore be described as a cognitive theory of instructional design. CLT has been very influential in educational research since the 1980s. It has inspired a growing number of research studies aimed at deriving empirically based guidelines for instructional design. Moreover, at its present stage of development, CLT is arguably one of the most influential instructional design theories. However, the extant research on cognitive load raises questions about the assumptions underlying CLT, some of which have not been consistently supported by the empirical data, suggesting the need to update the theory by incorporating recent empirical findings on cognition and learning (Schnotz & Kirschner, 2007). The first goal of this chapter is to summarize the theoretical developments of CLT and highlight some of its strengths and limitations. An additional contribution of CLT research includes efforts to develop practical, valid, and reliable measures of its main construct: cognitive load. However, as suggested in Chapter 9, the existing body of cognitive load research fails to exhibit methodological consistency regarding cognitive load measurement and lacks appropriate methods to measure other relevant constructs, such as the different load types proposed by the theory (DeLeeuw & Mayer, 2008).",
author = "Roland Br{\"u}nken and Jan Plass and Roxana Moreno",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511844744.014",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521860239",
pages = "253--272",
booktitle = "Cognitive Load Theory",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research

AU - Brünken, Roland

AU - Plass, Jan

AU - Moreno, Roxana

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The previous chapters have outlined the theoretical background, basic assumptions, and some key applications of Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) in its current state of development. The fundamental idea underlying CLT is that instructional design decisions should be informed by the architecture of the human cognitive system. CLT can therefore be described as a cognitive theory of instructional design. CLT has been very influential in educational research since the 1980s. It has inspired a growing number of research studies aimed at deriving empirically based guidelines for instructional design. Moreover, at its present stage of development, CLT is arguably one of the most influential instructional design theories. However, the extant research on cognitive load raises questions about the assumptions underlying CLT, some of which have not been consistently supported by the empirical data, suggesting the need to update the theory by incorporating recent empirical findings on cognition and learning (Schnotz & Kirschner, 2007). The first goal of this chapter is to summarize the theoretical developments of CLT and highlight some of its strengths and limitations. An additional contribution of CLT research includes efforts to develop practical, valid, and reliable measures of its main construct: cognitive load. However, as suggested in Chapter 9, the existing body of cognitive load research fails to exhibit methodological consistency regarding cognitive load measurement and lacks appropriate methods to measure other relevant constructs, such as the different load types proposed by the theory (DeLeeuw & Mayer, 2008).

AB - The previous chapters have outlined the theoretical background, basic assumptions, and some key applications of Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) in its current state of development. The fundamental idea underlying CLT is that instructional design decisions should be informed by the architecture of the human cognitive system. CLT can therefore be described as a cognitive theory of instructional design. CLT has been very influential in educational research since the 1980s. It has inspired a growing number of research studies aimed at deriving empirically based guidelines for instructional design. Moreover, at its present stage of development, CLT is arguably one of the most influential instructional design theories. However, the extant research on cognitive load raises questions about the assumptions underlying CLT, some of which have not been consistently supported by the empirical data, suggesting the need to update the theory by incorporating recent empirical findings on cognition and learning (Schnotz & Kirschner, 2007). The first goal of this chapter is to summarize the theoretical developments of CLT and highlight some of its strengths and limitations. An additional contribution of CLT research includes efforts to develop practical, valid, and reliable measures of its main construct: cognitive load. However, as suggested in Chapter 9, the existing body of cognitive load research fails to exhibit methodological consistency regarding cognitive load measurement and lacks appropriate methods to measure other relevant constructs, such as the different load types proposed by the theory (DeLeeuw & Mayer, 2008).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449290229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449290229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511844744.014

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511844744.014

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521860239

SP - 253

EP - 272

BT - Cognitive Load Theory

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -