Les dimensions culturelles du savoir/pouvoir. Les enjeux de la mesure de la violence envers les femmes

Translated title of the contribution: Cultural Dimensions of Power/Knowledge: The Challenges of Measuring Violence against Women

Sally Merry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    International governance, like all contemporary modes of governance, increasingly operates by means of quantitative measurements. Issues such as corruption, the rule of law, academic achievement, compliance with human rights norms, and accountability are generally translated into numbers and indicators. As quantification becomes ever more central to governance, it is critical to examine the cultural and social theoretical frameworks within which measurement systems are developed. A comparison of four cultural approaches to measuring violence against women globally shows that there are significant differences in what is made visible and what is disappeared in each one. Moreover, the organizations that promote these different approaches vary significantly in power and resources. Those generated by better resourced organizations come to dominate the definition of a phenomenon, such as violence against women, and the way it is understood. Ultimately, this shapes the way it is governed. Since regulation and governance depend on what quantitative data makes visible, these slippages have important implications for the practice of global governance.

    Original languageFrench
    Pages (from-to)370-380
    Number of pages11
    JournalSociologie du Travail
    Volume58
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    governance
    violence
    global governance
    constitutional state
    quantification
    academic achievement
    corruption
    human rights
    regulation
    responsibility
    Cultural dimensions
    Violence against women
    Governance
    resources
    Academic achievement
    Quantification
    Resources
    Global governance
    Human rights
    Rule of law

    Keywords

    • Global Governance
    • Human Rights
    • Indicators
    • Power/knowledge
    • Quantification
    • Violence against Women

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Industrial relations
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Les dimensions culturelles du savoir/pouvoir. Les enjeux de la mesure de la violence envers les femmes. / Merry, Sally.

    In: Sociologie du Travail, Vol. 58, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 370-380.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e82c88ed1d414546bb7e7487c2ca3dc2,
    title = "Les dimensions culturelles du savoir/pouvoir. Les enjeux de la mesure de la violence envers les femmes",
    abstract = "International governance, like all contemporary modes of governance, increasingly operates by means of quantitative measurements. Issues such as corruption, the rule of law, academic achievement, compliance with human rights norms, and accountability are generally translated into numbers and indicators. As quantification becomes ever more central to governance, it is critical to examine the cultural and social theoretical frameworks within which measurement systems are developed. A comparison of four cultural approaches to measuring violence against women globally shows that there are significant differences in what is made visible and what is disappeared in each one. Moreover, the organizations that promote these different approaches vary significantly in power and resources. Those generated by better resourced organizations come to dominate the definition of a phenomenon, such as violence against women, and the way it is understood. Ultimately, this shapes the way it is governed. Since regulation and governance depend on what quantitative data makes visible, these slippages have important implications for the practice of global governance.",
    keywords = "Global Governance, Human Rights, Indicators, Power/knowledge, Quantification, Violence against Women",
    author = "Sally Merry",
    year = "2016",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.soctra.2016.09.017",
    language = "French",
    volume = "58",
    pages = "370--380",
    journal = "Sociologie du Travail",
    issn = "0038-0296",
    publisher = "Elsevier Masson",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Les dimensions culturelles du savoir/pouvoir. Les enjeux de la mesure de la violence envers les femmes

    AU - Merry, Sally

    PY - 2016/10/1

    Y1 - 2016/10/1

    N2 - International governance, like all contemporary modes of governance, increasingly operates by means of quantitative measurements. Issues such as corruption, the rule of law, academic achievement, compliance with human rights norms, and accountability are generally translated into numbers and indicators. As quantification becomes ever more central to governance, it is critical to examine the cultural and social theoretical frameworks within which measurement systems are developed. A comparison of four cultural approaches to measuring violence against women globally shows that there are significant differences in what is made visible and what is disappeared in each one. Moreover, the organizations that promote these different approaches vary significantly in power and resources. Those generated by better resourced organizations come to dominate the definition of a phenomenon, such as violence against women, and the way it is understood. Ultimately, this shapes the way it is governed. Since regulation and governance depend on what quantitative data makes visible, these slippages have important implications for the practice of global governance.

    AB - International governance, like all contemporary modes of governance, increasingly operates by means of quantitative measurements. Issues such as corruption, the rule of law, academic achievement, compliance with human rights norms, and accountability are generally translated into numbers and indicators. As quantification becomes ever more central to governance, it is critical to examine the cultural and social theoretical frameworks within which measurement systems are developed. A comparison of four cultural approaches to measuring violence against women globally shows that there are significant differences in what is made visible and what is disappeared in each one. Moreover, the organizations that promote these different approaches vary significantly in power and resources. Those generated by better resourced organizations come to dominate the definition of a phenomenon, such as violence against women, and the way it is understood. Ultimately, this shapes the way it is governed. Since regulation and governance depend on what quantitative data makes visible, these slippages have important implications for the practice of global governance.

    KW - Global Governance

    KW - Human Rights

    KW - Indicators

    KW - Power/knowledge

    KW - Quantification

    KW - Violence against Women

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994852895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994852895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.soctra.2016.09.017

    DO - 10.1016/j.soctra.2016.09.017

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84994852895

    VL - 58

    SP - 370

    EP - 380

    JO - Sociologie du Travail

    JF - Sociologie du Travail

    SN - 0038-0296

    IS - 4

    ER -