Cultural differences in the automaticity of elemental impression formation

Hajin Lee, Yuki Shimizu, James S. Uleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cultural differences in impression formation are well known and multiply determined. Spontaneous impressions (which occur relatively freely from conscious strategies) are basic components of impressions, and spontaneous trait transference (STT) is perhaps the most elemental form. We used process dissociation procedures to estimate the contribution of automatic and controlled processes to STT among Japanese and American participants. STT occurred in both samples, but more frequently among Americans. Controlled processes were equally important in both samples, but automatic processes were weaker among Japanese. Thus, these cultural differences in the most elemental form of impression formation were largely attributable to automatic processes. The results are discussed in terms of both stage theories of trait inference and views of culture as consisting of automatic patterns of thought and action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume33
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Asian Americans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Lee, H., Shimizu, Y., & Uleman, J. S. (2015). Cultural differences in the automaticity of elemental impression formation. Social Cognition, 33(1), 1-19.

Cultural differences in the automaticity of elemental impression formation. / Lee, Hajin; Shimizu, Yuki; Uleman, James S.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2015, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, H, Shimizu, Y & Uleman, JS 2015, 'Cultural differences in the automaticity of elemental impression formation', Social Cognition, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1-19.
Lee, Hajin ; Shimizu, Yuki ; Uleman, James S. / Cultural differences in the automaticity of elemental impression formation. In: Social Cognition. 2015 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 1-19.
@article{034634f868aa4bf19aa10ccdeb52a675,
title = "Cultural differences in the automaticity of elemental impression formation",
abstract = "Cultural differences in impression formation are well known and multiply determined. Spontaneous impressions (which occur relatively freely from conscious strategies) are basic components of impressions, and spontaneous trait transference (STT) is perhaps the most elemental form. We used process dissociation procedures to estimate the contribution of automatic and controlled processes to STT among Japanese and American participants. STT occurred in both samples, but more frequently among Americans. Controlled processes were equally important in both samples, but automatic processes were weaker among Japanese. Thus, these cultural differences in the most elemental form of impression formation were largely attributable to automatic processes. The results are discussed in terms of both stage theories of trait inference and views of culture as consisting of automatic patterns of thought and action.",
author = "Hajin Lee and Yuki Shimizu and Uleman, {James S.}",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cultural differences in the automaticity of elemental impression formation

AU - Lee, Hajin

AU - Shimizu, Yuki

AU - Uleman, James S.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Cultural differences in impression formation are well known and multiply determined. Spontaneous impressions (which occur relatively freely from conscious strategies) are basic components of impressions, and spontaneous trait transference (STT) is perhaps the most elemental form. We used process dissociation procedures to estimate the contribution of automatic and controlled processes to STT among Japanese and American participants. STT occurred in both samples, but more frequently among Americans. Controlled processes were equally important in both samples, but automatic processes were weaker among Japanese. Thus, these cultural differences in the most elemental form of impression formation were largely attributable to automatic processes. The results are discussed in terms of both stage theories of trait inference and views of culture as consisting of automatic patterns of thought and action.

AB - Cultural differences in impression formation are well known and multiply determined. Spontaneous impressions (which occur relatively freely from conscious strategies) are basic components of impressions, and spontaneous trait transference (STT) is perhaps the most elemental form. We used process dissociation procedures to estimate the contribution of automatic and controlled processes to STT among Japanese and American participants. STT occurred in both samples, but more frequently among Americans. Controlled processes were equally important in both samples, but automatic processes were weaker among Japanese. Thus, these cultural differences in the most elemental form of impression formation were largely attributable to automatic processes. The results are discussed in terms of both stage theories of trait inference and views of culture as consisting of automatic patterns of thought and action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923824033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923824033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923824033

VL - 33

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 1

ER -