Cultural Differences in Spontaneous Trait and Situation Inferences

Hajin Lee, Yuki Shimizu, Takahiko Masuda, James Uleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous findings indicated that when people observe someone’s behavior, they spontaneously infer the traits and situations that cause the target person’s behavior. These inference processes are called spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) and spontaneous situation inferences (SSIs). While both patterns of inferences have been observed, no research has examined the extent to which people from different cultural backgrounds produce these inferences when information affords both trait and situation inferences. Based on the theoretical frameworks of social orientations and thinking styles, we hypothesized that European Canadians would be more likely to produce STIs than SSIs because of the individualistic/independent social orientation and the analytic thinking style dominant in North America, whereas Japanese would produce both STIs and SSIs equally because of the collectivistic/interdependent social orientation and the holistic thinking style dominant in East Asia. Employing the savings-in-relearning paradigm, we presented information that affords both STIs and SSIs and examined cultural differences in the extent of both inferences. The results supported our hypotheses. The relationships between culturally dominant styles of thought and the inference processes in impression formation are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)627-643
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Far East
North America
cultural difference
Research
attitude formation
savings
paradigm
cause
human being

Keywords

  • culture
  • impression formation
  • savings-in-relearning
  • situation inferences
  • social orientations
  • spontaneous trait
  • thinking styles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Cultural Differences in Spontaneous Trait and Situation Inferences. / Lee, Hajin; Shimizu, Yuki; Masuda, Takahiko; Uleman, James.

In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 5, 01.06.2017, p. 627-643.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Hajin ; Shimizu, Yuki ; Masuda, Takahiko ; Uleman, James. / Cultural Differences in Spontaneous Trait and Situation Inferences. In: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 48, No. 5. pp. 627-643.
@article{8f0068ad7d9b4f76b04ab753781f5e98,
title = "Cultural Differences in Spontaneous Trait and Situation Inferences",
abstract = "Previous findings indicated that when people observe someone’s behavior, they spontaneously infer the traits and situations that cause the target person’s behavior. These inference processes are called spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) and spontaneous situation inferences (SSIs). While both patterns of inferences have been observed, no research has examined the extent to which people from different cultural backgrounds produce these inferences when information affords both trait and situation inferences. Based on the theoretical frameworks of social orientations and thinking styles, we hypothesized that European Canadians would be more likely to produce STIs than SSIs because of the individualistic/independent social orientation and the analytic thinking style dominant in North America, whereas Japanese would produce both STIs and SSIs equally because of the collectivistic/interdependent social orientation and the holistic thinking style dominant in East Asia. Employing the savings-in-relearning paradigm, we presented information that affords both STIs and SSIs and examined cultural differences in the extent of both inferences. The results supported our hypotheses. The relationships between culturally dominant styles of thought and the inference processes in impression formation are discussed.",
keywords = "culture, impression formation, savings-in-relearning, situation inferences, social orientations, spontaneous trait, thinking styles",
author = "Hajin Lee and Yuki Shimizu and Takahiko Masuda and James Uleman",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022022117699279",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "627--643",
journal = "Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology",
issn = "0022-0221",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cultural Differences in Spontaneous Trait and Situation Inferences

AU - Lee, Hajin

AU - Shimizu, Yuki

AU - Masuda, Takahiko

AU - Uleman, James

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Previous findings indicated that when people observe someone’s behavior, they spontaneously infer the traits and situations that cause the target person’s behavior. These inference processes are called spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) and spontaneous situation inferences (SSIs). While both patterns of inferences have been observed, no research has examined the extent to which people from different cultural backgrounds produce these inferences when information affords both trait and situation inferences. Based on the theoretical frameworks of social orientations and thinking styles, we hypothesized that European Canadians would be more likely to produce STIs than SSIs because of the individualistic/independent social orientation and the analytic thinking style dominant in North America, whereas Japanese would produce both STIs and SSIs equally because of the collectivistic/interdependent social orientation and the holistic thinking style dominant in East Asia. Employing the savings-in-relearning paradigm, we presented information that affords both STIs and SSIs and examined cultural differences in the extent of both inferences. The results supported our hypotheses. The relationships between culturally dominant styles of thought and the inference processes in impression formation are discussed.

AB - Previous findings indicated that when people observe someone’s behavior, they spontaneously infer the traits and situations that cause the target person’s behavior. These inference processes are called spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) and spontaneous situation inferences (SSIs). While both patterns of inferences have been observed, no research has examined the extent to which people from different cultural backgrounds produce these inferences when information affords both trait and situation inferences. Based on the theoretical frameworks of social orientations and thinking styles, we hypothesized that European Canadians would be more likely to produce STIs than SSIs because of the individualistic/independent social orientation and the analytic thinking style dominant in North America, whereas Japanese would produce both STIs and SSIs equally because of the collectivistic/interdependent social orientation and the holistic thinking style dominant in East Asia. Employing the savings-in-relearning paradigm, we presented information that affords both STIs and SSIs and examined cultural differences in the extent of both inferences. The results supported our hypotheses. The relationships between culturally dominant styles of thought and the inference processes in impression formation are discussed.

KW - culture

KW - impression formation

KW - savings-in-relearning

KW - situation inferences

KW - social orientations

KW - spontaneous trait

KW - thinking styles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019171364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019171364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022022117699279

DO - 10.1177/0022022117699279

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 627

EP - 643

JO - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

JF - Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

SN - 0022-0221

IS - 5

ER -