Cuing effects of faces are dependent on handedness and visual field

Emma Ferneyhough, Damian A. Stanley, Elizabeth Phelps, Marisa Carrasco-Queijeiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Faces are unlike other visual objects we encounter, in that they alert us to potentially relevant social information. Both face processing and spatial attention are dominant in the right hemisphere of the human brain, with a stronger lateralization in right- than in left-handers. Here, we demonstrate behavioral evidence for an effect of handedness on performance in tasks using faces to direct attention. Nonpredictive, peripheral cues (faces or dots) directed exogenous attention to contrast-varying stimuli (Gabor patches)-a tilted target, a vertical distractor, or both; observers made orientation discriminations on the target stimuli. Whereas cuing with dots increased contrast sensitivity in both groups, cuing with faces increased contrast sensitivity in right- but not in left-handers, for whom opposite hemifield effects resulted in no net increase. Our results reveal that attention modulation by face cues critically depends on handedness and visual hemifield. These previously unreported interactions suggest that such lateralized systems may be functionally connected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-535
Number of pages7
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Functional Laterality
Visual Fields
Contrast Sensitivity
Cues
Task Performance and Analysis
Handedness
Visual Field
Brain
Stimulus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Cuing effects of faces are dependent on handedness and visual field. / Ferneyhough, Emma; Stanley, Damian A.; Phelps, Elizabeth; Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2010, p. 529-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferneyhough, Emma ; Stanley, Damian A. ; Phelps, Elizabeth ; Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa. / Cuing effects of faces are dependent on handedness and visual field. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 529-535.
@article{18cd51c05658469ba524e76cd7c67b14,
title = "Cuing effects of faces are dependent on handedness and visual field",
abstract = "Faces are unlike other visual objects we encounter, in that they alert us to potentially relevant social information. Both face processing and spatial attention are dominant in the right hemisphere of the human brain, with a stronger lateralization in right- than in left-handers. Here, we demonstrate behavioral evidence for an effect of handedness on performance in tasks using faces to direct attention. Nonpredictive, peripheral cues (faces or dots) directed exogenous attention to contrast-varying stimuli (Gabor patches)-a tilted target, a vertical distractor, or both; observers made orientation discriminations on the target stimuli. Whereas cuing with dots increased contrast sensitivity in both groups, cuing with faces increased contrast sensitivity in right- but not in left-handers, for whom opposite hemifield effects resulted in no net increase. Our results reveal that attention modulation by face cues critically depends on handedness and visual hemifield. These previously unreported interactions suggest that such lateralized systems may be functionally connected.",
author = "Emma Ferneyhough and Stanley, {Damian A.} and Elizabeth Phelps and Marisa Carrasco-Queijeiro",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.3758/PBR.17.4.529",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "529--535",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cuing effects of faces are dependent on handedness and visual field

AU - Ferneyhough, Emma

AU - Stanley, Damian A.

AU - Phelps, Elizabeth

AU - Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Faces are unlike other visual objects we encounter, in that they alert us to potentially relevant social information. Both face processing and spatial attention are dominant in the right hemisphere of the human brain, with a stronger lateralization in right- than in left-handers. Here, we demonstrate behavioral evidence for an effect of handedness on performance in tasks using faces to direct attention. Nonpredictive, peripheral cues (faces or dots) directed exogenous attention to contrast-varying stimuli (Gabor patches)-a tilted target, a vertical distractor, or both; observers made orientation discriminations on the target stimuli. Whereas cuing with dots increased contrast sensitivity in both groups, cuing with faces increased contrast sensitivity in right- but not in left-handers, for whom opposite hemifield effects resulted in no net increase. Our results reveal that attention modulation by face cues critically depends on handedness and visual hemifield. These previously unreported interactions suggest that such lateralized systems may be functionally connected.

AB - Faces are unlike other visual objects we encounter, in that they alert us to potentially relevant social information. Both face processing and spatial attention are dominant in the right hemisphere of the human brain, with a stronger lateralization in right- than in left-handers. Here, we demonstrate behavioral evidence for an effect of handedness on performance in tasks using faces to direct attention. Nonpredictive, peripheral cues (faces or dots) directed exogenous attention to contrast-varying stimuli (Gabor patches)-a tilted target, a vertical distractor, or both; observers made orientation discriminations on the target stimuli. Whereas cuing with dots increased contrast sensitivity in both groups, cuing with faces increased contrast sensitivity in right- but not in left-handers, for whom opposite hemifield effects resulted in no net increase. Our results reveal that attention modulation by face cues critically depends on handedness and visual hemifield. These previously unreported interactions suggest that such lateralized systems may be functionally connected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957279737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957279737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/PBR.17.4.529

DO - 10.3758/PBR.17.4.529

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 529

EP - 535

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 4

ER -