Cue reactivity in converted and native intermittent smokers

Saul Shiffman, Michael S. Dunbar, Thomas R. Kirchner, Xiaoxue Li, Hilary A. Tindle, Stewart J. Anderson, Sarah M. Scholl, Stuart G. Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Nondaily, or intermittent smokers (ITS), who constitute a substantial fraction of U.S. smokers, are thought to smoke in response to cues. Previous cue reactivity research showed no difference between ITS and daily smokers in response to cues. This report examines whether "converted" ITS (CITS) with a history of past daily smoking differ from "native" ITS (NITS) in craving and smoking in response to cues. Methods: A total of 146 CITS (who previously smoked daily for at least 6 months) and 73 NITS participated. Participants were exposed to 5 active cues (smoking, alcohol, negative affect, positive affect, and smoking prohibitions) and a control neutral cue, in separate sessions. Changes in craving were assessed pre-post cue exposure. Smoking behavior (smoking [y/n], smoking latency, number of cigarettes, number of puffs, and increase in carbon monoxide [CO]) was observed. Analyses contrasted response to each active cue compared to the neutral cue and controlled for order effects and for time since last cigarette, which differed between groups. Results: Regardless of cues, CITS reported higher craving and greater change in craving, were more likely to smoke, tended to progress faster to smoking, and showed greater increases in CO when they did smoke. NITS and CITS showed similar cue reactivity on most measures, though NITS took more puffs after viewing smoking cues (compared to neutral) than did CITS. Conclusions: Though CITS show some remnants of their history of daily smoking, CITS and NITS demonstrate similar cue reactivity, suggesting that they would not require different behavioral approaches to help them quit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-123
Number of pages5
JournalNicotine and Tobacco Research
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Cues
Smoking
Smoke
Carbon Monoxide
Tobacco Products
Alcohols
Craving

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Shiffman, S., Dunbar, M. S., Kirchner, T. R., Li, X., Tindle, H. A., Anderson, S. J., ... Ferguson, S. G. (2015). Cue reactivity in converted and native intermittent smokers. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 17(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu147

Cue reactivity in converted and native intermittent smokers. / Shiffman, Saul; Dunbar, Michael S.; Kirchner, Thomas R.; Li, Xiaoxue; Tindle, Hilary A.; Anderson, Stewart J.; Scholl, Sarah M.; Ferguson, Stuart G.

In: Nicotine and Tobacco Research, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 119-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shiffman, S, Dunbar, MS, Kirchner, TR, Li, X, Tindle, HA, Anderson, SJ, Scholl, SM & Ferguson, SG 2015, 'Cue reactivity in converted and native intermittent smokers', Nicotine and Tobacco Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu147
Shiffman, Saul ; Dunbar, Michael S. ; Kirchner, Thomas R. ; Li, Xiaoxue ; Tindle, Hilary A. ; Anderson, Stewart J. ; Scholl, Sarah M. ; Ferguson, Stuart G. / Cue reactivity in converted and native intermittent smokers. In: Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 119-123.
@article{a2cf7bcd32d24995994230b20e1f0756,
title = "Cue reactivity in converted and native intermittent smokers",
abstract = "Introduction: Nondaily, or intermittent smokers (ITS), who constitute a substantial fraction of U.S. smokers, are thought to smoke in response to cues. Previous cue reactivity research showed no difference between ITS and daily smokers in response to cues. This report examines whether {"}converted{"} ITS (CITS) with a history of past daily smoking differ from {"}native{"} ITS (NITS) in craving and smoking in response to cues. Methods: A total of 146 CITS (who previously smoked daily for at least 6 months) and 73 NITS participated. Participants were exposed to 5 active cues (smoking, alcohol, negative affect, positive affect, and smoking prohibitions) and a control neutral cue, in separate sessions. Changes in craving were assessed pre-post cue exposure. Smoking behavior (smoking [y/n], smoking latency, number of cigarettes, number of puffs, and increase in carbon monoxide [CO]) was observed. Analyses contrasted response to each active cue compared to the neutral cue and controlled for order effects and for time since last cigarette, which differed between groups. Results: Regardless of cues, CITS reported higher craving and greater change in craving, were more likely to smoke, tended to progress faster to smoking, and showed greater increases in CO when they did smoke. NITS and CITS showed similar cue reactivity on most measures, though NITS took more puffs after viewing smoking cues (compared to neutral) than did CITS. Conclusions: Though CITS show some remnants of their history of daily smoking, CITS and NITS demonstrate similar cue reactivity, suggesting that they would not require different behavioral approaches to help them quit.",
author = "Saul Shiffman and Dunbar, {Michael S.} and Kirchner, {Thomas R.} and Xiaoxue Li and Tindle, {Hilary A.} and Anderson, {Stewart J.} and Scholl, {Sarah M.} and Ferguson, {Stuart G.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ntr/ntu147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "119--123",
journal = "Nicotine and Tobacco Research",
issn = "1462-2203",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cue reactivity in converted and native intermittent smokers

AU - Shiffman, Saul

AU - Dunbar, Michael S.

AU - Kirchner, Thomas R.

AU - Li, Xiaoxue

AU - Tindle, Hilary A.

AU - Anderson, Stewart J.

AU - Scholl, Sarah M.

AU - Ferguson, Stuart G.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Nondaily, or intermittent smokers (ITS), who constitute a substantial fraction of U.S. smokers, are thought to smoke in response to cues. Previous cue reactivity research showed no difference between ITS and daily smokers in response to cues. This report examines whether "converted" ITS (CITS) with a history of past daily smoking differ from "native" ITS (NITS) in craving and smoking in response to cues. Methods: A total of 146 CITS (who previously smoked daily for at least 6 months) and 73 NITS participated. Participants were exposed to 5 active cues (smoking, alcohol, negative affect, positive affect, and smoking prohibitions) and a control neutral cue, in separate sessions. Changes in craving were assessed pre-post cue exposure. Smoking behavior (smoking [y/n], smoking latency, number of cigarettes, number of puffs, and increase in carbon monoxide [CO]) was observed. Analyses contrasted response to each active cue compared to the neutral cue and controlled for order effects and for time since last cigarette, which differed between groups. Results: Regardless of cues, CITS reported higher craving and greater change in craving, were more likely to smoke, tended to progress faster to smoking, and showed greater increases in CO when they did smoke. NITS and CITS showed similar cue reactivity on most measures, though NITS took more puffs after viewing smoking cues (compared to neutral) than did CITS. Conclusions: Though CITS show some remnants of their history of daily smoking, CITS and NITS demonstrate similar cue reactivity, suggesting that they would not require different behavioral approaches to help them quit.

AB - Introduction: Nondaily, or intermittent smokers (ITS), who constitute a substantial fraction of U.S. smokers, are thought to smoke in response to cues. Previous cue reactivity research showed no difference between ITS and daily smokers in response to cues. This report examines whether "converted" ITS (CITS) with a history of past daily smoking differ from "native" ITS (NITS) in craving and smoking in response to cues. Methods: A total of 146 CITS (who previously smoked daily for at least 6 months) and 73 NITS participated. Participants were exposed to 5 active cues (smoking, alcohol, negative affect, positive affect, and smoking prohibitions) and a control neutral cue, in separate sessions. Changes in craving were assessed pre-post cue exposure. Smoking behavior (smoking [y/n], smoking latency, number of cigarettes, number of puffs, and increase in carbon monoxide [CO]) was observed. Analyses contrasted response to each active cue compared to the neutral cue and controlled for order effects and for time since last cigarette, which differed between groups. Results: Regardless of cues, CITS reported higher craving and greater change in craving, were more likely to smoke, tended to progress faster to smoking, and showed greater increases in CO when they did smoke. NITS and CITS showed similar cue reactivity on most measures, though NITS took more puffs after viewing smoking cues (compared to neutral) than did CITS. Conclusions: Though CITS show some remnants of their history of daily smoking, CITS and NITS demonstrate similar cue reactivity, suggesting that they would not require different behavioral approaches to help them quit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922432980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922432980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ntr/ntu147

DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntu147

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 119

EP - 123

JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research

JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research

SN - 1462-2203

IS - 1

ER -