Cue elicited urge to drink and salivation in alcoholics: Relationship to individual differences

Damaris J. Rohsenow, Peter M. Monti, David Abrams, Anthony V. Rubonis, Raymond Niaura, Alan D. Sirota, Suzanne M. Colby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social learning models of relapse have included a focus on the learned reactions of substance abusers to the presence of substance use cues, but the relative roles played by cue-elicited psychophysiological reactions and urges to use have been unclear. The relationships of these kinds of cue-elicited reactions to each other, to measures of individual differences, to attentional processes, and to relapse are reviewed across three recent studies (published or to be published elsewhere). Alcoholic males who participated in one of three studies were assessed for cue reactivity (salivation and urge to drink while sniffing an alcoholic beverage versus water) as well as individual difference measures. Salivation and urge to drink have a weak or nonsignificant relationship to each other. Cue-elicited urge to drink generally correlates with negative mood, awareness of somatic reactions, attention to alcohol, and enjoyment of the sight and smell of alcohol. Salivation tends not to be related to these conscious processes although it is greater among those who expect more positive effects from alcohol, and among those with more alcohol dependence. Salivation but not urge to drink was predictive of quantity and frequency of drinking during the first three months post-detoxification. Results are generally consistent with appetitive-motivation models of alcohol use and with Tiffany's (1990) hypothesis that automatic processes are more important than conscious processes in drug-use behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-210
Number of pages16
JournalAdvances in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Salivation
Alcoholics
Individuality
Cues
Alcohols
Recurrence
Alcoholic Beverages
Smell
Alcoholism
Drinking
Motivation
Water
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Cue elicited urge to drink and salivation in alcoholics : Relationship to individual differences. / Rohsenow, Damaris J.; Monti, Peter M.; Abrams, David; Rubonis, Anthony V.; Niaura, Raymond; Sirota, Alan D.; Colby, Suzanne M.

In: Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1992, p. 195-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rohsenow, Damaris J. ; Monti, Peter M. ; Abrams, David ; Rubonis, Anthony V. ; Niaura, Raymond ; Sirota, Alan D. ; Colby, Suzanne M. / Cue elicited urge to drink and salivation in alcoholics : Relationship to individual differences. In: Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1992 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 195-210.
@article{a21351eba0d64182abc8a752bfc02f90,
title = "Cue elicited urge to drink and salivation in alcoholics: Relationship to individual differences",
abstract = "Social learning models of relapse have included a focus on the learned reactions of substance abusers to the presence of substance use cues, but the relative roles played by cue-elicited psychophysiological reactions and urges to use have been unclear. The relationships of these kinds of cue-elicited reactions to each other, to measures of individual differences, to attentional processes, and to relapse are reviewed across three recent studies (published or to be published elsewhere). Alcoholic males who participated in one of three studies were assessed for cue reactivity (salivation and urge to drink while sniffing an alcoholic beverage versus water) as well as individual difference measures. Salivation and urge to drink have a weak or nonsignificant relationship to each other. Cue-elicited urge to drink generally correlates with negative mood, awareness of somatic reactions, attention to alcohol, and enjoyment of the sight and smell of alcohol. Salivation tends not to be related to these conscious processes although it is greater among those who expect more positive effects from alcohol, and among those with more alcohol dependence. Salivation but not urge to drink was predictive of quantity and frequency of drinking during the first three months post-detoxification. Results are generally consistent with appetitive-motivation models of alcohol use and with Tiffany's (1990) hypothesis that automatic processes are more important than conscious processes in drug-use behavior.",
author = "Rohsenow, {Damaris J.} and Monti, {Peter M.} and David Abrams and Rubonis, {Anthony V.} and Raymond Niaura and Sirota, {Alan D.} and Colby, {Suzanne M.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0146-6402(92)90008-C",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "195--210",
journal = "Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy",
issn = "0146-6402",
publisher = "Pergamon Press Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cue elicited urge to drink and salivation in alcoholics

T2 - Relationship to individual differences

AU - Rohsenow, Damaris J.

AU - Monti, Peter M.

AU - Abrams, David

AU - Rubonis, Anthony V.

AU - Niaura, Raymond

AU - Sirota, Alan D.

AU - Colby, Suzanne M.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Social learning models of relapse have included a focus on the learned reactions of substance abusers to the presence of substance use cues, but the relative roles played by cue-elicited psychophysiological reactions and urges to use have been unclear. The relationships of these kinds of cue-elicited reactions to each other, to measures of individual differences, to attentional processes, and to relapse are reviewed across three recent studies (published or to be published elsewhere). Alcoholic males who participated in one of three studies were assessed for cue reactivity (salivation and urge to drink while sniffing an alcoholic beverage versus water) as well as individual difference measures. Salivation and urge to drink have a weak or nonsignificant relationship to each other. Cue-elicited urge to drink generally correlates with negative mood, awareness of somatic reactions, attention to alcohol, and enjoyment of the sight and smell of alcohol. Salivation tends not to be related to these conscious processes although it is greater among those who expect more positive effects from alcohol, and among those with more alcohol dependence. Salivation but not urge to drink was predictive of quantity and frequency of drinking during the first three months post-detoxification. Results are generally consistent with appetitive-motivation models of alcohol use and with Tiffany's (1990) hypothesis that automatic processes are more important than conscious processes in drug-use behavior.

AB - Social learning models of relapse have included a focus on the learned reactions of substance abusers to the presence of substance use cues, but the relative roles played by cue-elicited psychophysiological reactions and urges to use have been unclear. The relationships of these kinds of cue-elicited reactions to each other, to measures of individual differences, to attentional processes, and to relapse are reviewed across three recent studies (published or to be published elsewhere). Alcoholic males who participated in one of three studies were assessed for cue reactivity (salivation and urge to drink while sniffing an alcoholic beverage versus water) as well as individual difference measures. Salivation and urge to drink have a weak or nonsignificant relationship to each other. Cue-elicited urge to drink generally correlates with negative mood, awareness of somatic reactions, attention to alcohol, and enjoyment of the sight and smell of alcohol. Salivation tends not to be related to these conscious processes although it is greater among those who expect more positive effects from alcohol, and among those with more alcohol dependence. Salivation but not urge to drink was predictive of quantity and frequency of drinking during the first three months post-detoxification. Results are generally consistent with appetitive-motivation models of alcohol use and with Tiffany's (1990) hypothesis that automatic processes are more important than conscious processes in drug-use behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026763076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026763076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0146-6402(92)90008-C

DO - 10.1016/0146-6402(92)90008-C

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026763076

VL - 14

SP - 195

EP - 210

JO - Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy

JF - Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy

SN - 0146-6402

IS - 3

ER -