Cross-cultural evaluation of the relevance of the HCAHPS survey in five European countries

Allison Squires, Luk Bruyneel, Linda H. Aiken, Koen Van den heede, Tomasz Brzostek, Reinhard Busse, Anneli Ensio, Maria Schubert, Dimitrios Zikos, Walter Sermeus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To describe the systematic language translation and cross-cultural evaluation process that assessed the relevance of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey in five European countries prior to national data collection efforts. Design: An approach involving a systematic translation process, expert review by experienced researchers and a review by 'patient' experts involving the use of content validity indexing techniques with chance correction. Setting: Five European countries where Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian and Polish are spoken. Participants: 'Patient' experts who had recently experienced a hospitalization in the participating country. Main OutcomeMeasure(s): Content validity indexing with chance correction adjustment providing a quantifiable measure that evaluates the conceptual, contextual, content, semantic and technical equivalence of the instrument in relationship to the patient care experience. Results: All translations except two received 'excellent' ratings and no significant differences existed between scores for languages spoken in more than one country. Patient raters across all countries expressed different concerns about some of the demographic questions and their relevance for evaluating patient satisfaction. Removing demographic questions from the evaluation produced a significant improvement in the scale-level scores (P = .018). The cross-cultural evaluation process suggested that translations and content of the patient satisfaction survey were relevant across countries and languages. Conclusions: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey is relevant to some European hospital systems and has the potential to produce internationally comparable patient satisfaction scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbermzs040
Pages (from-to)470-475
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Language
Health Personnel
Demography
Delivery of Health Care
Semantics
Patient Care
Hospitalization
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural research
  • HCAHPS
  • Health services research
  • Instrument validation
  • Measurement
  • Patient satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Squires, A., Bruyneel, L., Aiken, L. H., Van den heede, K., Brzostek, T., Busse, R., ... Sermeus, W. (2012). Cross-cultural evaluation of the relevance of the HCAHPS survey in five European countries. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 24(5), 470-475. [mzs040]. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzs040

Cross-cultural evaluation of the relevance of the HCAHPS survey in five European countries. / Squires, Allison; Bruyneel, Luk; Aiken, Linda H.; Van den heede, Koen; Brzostek, Tomasz; Busse, Reinhard; Ensio, Anneli; Schubert, Maria; Zikos, Dimitrios; Sermeus, Walter.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 24, No. 5, mzs040, 10.2012, p. 470-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Squires, A, Bruyneel, L, Aiken, LH, Van den heede, K, Brzostek, T, Busse, R, Ensio, A, Schubert, M, Zikos, D & Sermeus, W 2012, 'Cross-cultural evaluation of the relevance of the HCAHPS survey in five European countries', International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 24, no. 5, mzs040, pp. 470-475. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzs040
Squires, Allison ; Bruyneel, Luk ; Aiken, Linda H. ; Van den heede, Koen ; Brzostek, Tomasz ; Busse, Reinhard ; Ensio, Anneli ; Schubert, Maria ; Zikos, Dimitrios ; Sermeus, Walter. / Cross-cultural evaluation of the relevance of the HCAHPS survey in five European countries. In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 470-475.
@article{400064c1051940bab7a9db1b574edd0d,
title = "Cross-cultural evaluation of the relevance of the HCAHPS survey in five European countries",
abstract = "Objective: To describe the systematic language translation and cross-cultural evaluation process that assessed the relevance of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey in five European countries prior to national data collection efforts. Design: An approach involving a systematic translation process, expert review by experienced researchers and a review by 'patient' experts involving the use of content validity indexing techniques with chance correction. Setting: Five European countries where Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian and Polish are spoken. Participants: 'Patient' experts who had recently experienced a hospitalization in the participating country. Main OutcomeMeasure(s): Content validity indexing with chance correction adjustment providing a quantifiable measure that evaluates the conceptual, contextual, content, semantic and technical equivalence of the instrument in relationship to the patient care experience. Results: All translations except two received 'excellent' ratings and no significant differences existed between scores for languages spoken in more than one country. Patient raters across all countries expressed different concerns about some of the demographic questions and their relevance for evaluating patient satisfaction. Removing demographic questions from the evaluation produced a significant improvement in the scale-level scores (P = .018). The cross-cultural evaluation process suggested that translations and content of the patient satisfaction survey were relevant across countries and languages. Conclusions: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey is relevant to some European hospital systems and has the potential to produce internationally comparable patient satisfaction scores.",
keywords = "Cross-cultural research, HCAHPS, Health services research, Instrument validation, Measurement, Patient satisfaction",
author = "Allison Squires and Luk Bruyneel and Aiken, {Linda H.} and {Van den heede}, Koen and Tomasz Brzostek and Reinhard Busse and Anneli Ensio and Maria Schubert and Dimitrios Zikos and Walter Sermeus",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzs040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "470--475",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural evaluation of the relevance of the HCAHPS survey in five European countries

AU - Squires, Allison

AU - Bruyneel, Luk

AU - Aiken, Linda H.

AU - Van den heede, Koen

AU - Brzostek, Tomasz

AU - Busse, Reinhard

AU - Ensio, Anneli

AU - Schubert, Maria

AU - Zikos, Dimitrios

AU - Sermeus, Walter

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Objective: To describe the systematic language translation and cross-cultural evaluation process that assessed the relevance of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey in five European countries prior to national data collection efforts. Design: An approach involving a systematic translation process, expert review by experienced researchers and a review by 'patient' experts involving the use of content validity indexing techniques with chance correction. Setting: Five European countries where Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian and Polish are spoken. Participants: 'Patient' experts who had recently experienced a hospitalization in the participating country. Main OutcomeMeasure(s): Content validity indexing with chance correction adjustment providing a quantifiable measure that evaluates the conceptual, contextual, content, semantic and technical equivalence of the instrument in relationship to the patient care experience. Results: All translations except two received 'excellent' ratings and no significant differences existed between scores for languages spoken in more than one country. Patient raters across all countries expressed different concerns about some of the demographic questions and their relevance for evaluating patient satisfaction. Removing demographic questions from the evaluation produced a significant improvement in the scale-level scores (P = .018). The cross-cultural evaluation process suggested that translations and content of the patient satisfaction survey were relevant across countries and languages. Conclusions: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey is relevant to some European hospital systems and has the potential to produce internationally comparable patient satisfaction scores.

AB - Objective: To describe the systematic language translation and cross-cultural evaluation process that assessed the relevance of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey in five European countries prior to national data collection efforts. Design: An approach involving a systematic translation process, expert review by experienced researchers and a review by 'patient' experts involving the use of content validity indexing techniques with chance correction. Setting: Five European countries where Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian and Polish are spoken. Participants: 'Patient' experts who had recently experienced a hospitalization in the participating country. Main OutcomeMeasure(s): Content validity indexing with chance correction adjustment providing a quantifiable measure that evaluates the conceptual, contextual, content, semantic and technical equivalence of the instrument in relationship to the patient care experience. Results: All translations except two received 'excellent' ratings and no significant differences existed between scores for languages spoken in more than one country. Patient raters across all countries expressed different concerns about some of the demographic questions and their relevance for evaluating patient satisfaction. Removing demographic questions from the evaluation produced a significant improvement in the scale-level scores (P = .018). The cross-cultural evaluation process suggested that translations and content of the patient satisfaction survey were relevant across countries and languages. Conclusions: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey is relevant to some European hospital systems and has the potential to produce internationally comparable patient satisfaction scores.

KW - Cross-cultural research

KW - HCAHPS

KW - Health services research

KW - Instrument validation

KW - Measurement

KW - Patient satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866354884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866354884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzs040

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzs040

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 470

EP - 475

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 5

M1 - mzs040

ER -