Creeping Dispositionism

The Temporal Dynamics of Behavior Prediction

Shiri Nussbaum, Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Four studies tested the hypothesis that temporal distance increases the weight of global dispositions in predicting and explaining future behavior. Study 1 found that the correspondence bias was manifested more strongly in predictions of distant future behavior than of near future behavior. Study 2 found that participants predicted higher cross-situational consistency in distant future behavior than in near future behavior. Study 3 found that participants sought information about others' more global dispositions for predicting distant future than near future behavior. Finally, Study 4 found that participants made more global causal attributions for distant future outcomes than for near future outcomes. The results were interpreted as supporting the assumption of construal level theory that perceivers use more abstract representations (higher level construals) to predict and explain more distant future behaviors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)485-497
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume84
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Weights and Measures
disposition
attribution
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Creeping Dispositionism : The Temporal Dynamics of Behavior Prediction. / Nussbaum, Shiri; Trope, Yaacov; Liberman, Nira.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 3, 01.01.2003, p. 485-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2375b5048ae048f483a878dfa282cfa5,
title = "Creeping Dispositionism: The Temporal Dynamics of Behavior Prediction",
abstract = "Four studies tested the hypothesis that temporal distance increases the weight of global dispositions in predicting and explaining future behavior. Study 1 found that the correspondence bias was manifested more strongly in predictions of distant future behavior than of near future behavior. Study 2 found that participants predicted higher cross-situational consistency in distant future behavior than in near future behavior. Study 3 found that participants sought information about others' more global dispositions for predicting distant future than near future behavior. Finally, Study 4 found that participants made more global causal attributions for distant future outcomes than for near future outcomes. The results were interpreted as supporting the assumption of construal level theory that perceivers use more abstract representations (higher level construals) to predict and explain more distant future behaviors.",
author = "Shiri Nussbaum and Yaacov Trope and Nira Liberman",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.485",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "485--497",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creeping Dispositionism

T2 - The Temporal Dynamics of Behavior Prediction

AU - Nussbaum, Shiri

AU - Trope, Yaacov

AU - Liberman, Nira

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Four studies tested the hypothesis that temporal distance increases the weight of global dispositions in predicting and explaining future behavior. Study 1 found that the correspondence bias was manifested more strongly in predictions of distant future behavior than of near future behavior. Study 2 found that participants predicted higher cross-situational consistency in distant future behavior than in near future behavior. Study 3 found that participants sought information about others' more global dispositions for predicting distant future than near future behavior. Finally, Study 4 found that participants made more global causal attributions for distant future outcomes than for near future outcomes. The results were interpreted as supporting the assumption of construal level theory that perceivers use more abstract representations (higher level construals) to predict and explain more distant future behaviors.

AB - Four studies tested the hypothesis that temporal distance increases the weight of global dispositions in predicting and explaining future behavior. Study 1 found that the correspondence bias was manifested more strongly in predictions of distant future behavior than of near future behavior. Study 2 found that participants predicted higher cross-situational consistency in distant future behavior than in near future behavior. Study 3 found that participants sought information about others' more global dispositions for predicting distant future than near future behavior. Finally, Study 4 found that participants made more global causal attributions for distant future outcomes than for near future outcomes. The results were interpreted as supporting the assumption of construal level theory that perceivers use more abstract representations (higher level construals) to predict and explain more distant future behaviors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047690265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047690265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.485

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.485

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 485

EP - 497

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -