Creation and causation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Medieval thinkers regarded it as a foundational tenet of faith that the world had come to be through divine agency. The three monotheist Scriptures testify to this in clear terms, and each of the attendant theologies also came to regard it as important that God be recognized as creator. But how is God’s creative act to be understood? does it correspond to some recognized category of change, either straightforwardly or by analogy? Are the facts of creation and its salient characteristics susceptible to rational analysis and demonstration, or do they fall outside those phenomena that it is the business of philosophy to investigate? And what might the connection, or lack thereof, tell us about either creation or causation? After lengthy deliberations. At the same time, medieval philosophers also inherited the dominant philosophical view that the sensible world has always existed, a sempiternal beneficiary of an eternal agency. The compatibility of these two positions was considered problematic early on, and gave rise to an extensive debate over the eternity of the world. Because eternity was closely linked with self-sufficiency in the philosophical tradition, the idea that there might be other eternal principles besides God prompted questions about the necessity and contingency of the current world order and the different ways in which causal dependency might be construed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages232-246
Number of pages15
Volume1
ISBN (Electronic)9781139095433
ISBN (Print)9780521762168
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Causation
Deity
Eternal
Medieval Period
Tenets
Creator
Deliberation
Contingency
Beneficiaries
Rational Analysis
Salient
Scripture
Philosopher
Compatibility
Philosophical Traditions
Causal
Philosophy
Faith
Thinkers
Self-sufficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Kukkonen, K. T. (2009). Creation and causation. In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. 232-246). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.019

Creation and causation. / Kukkonen, Kalle Taneli.

The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Vol. 1 Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 232-246.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kukkonen, KT 2009, Creation and causation. in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 232-246. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.019
Kukkonen KT. Creation and causation. In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. 2009. p. 232-246 https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.019
Kukkonen, Kalle Taneli. / Creation and causation. The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Vol. 1 Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 232-246
@inbook{e8dfeaaaf0284b6d96107ad0aa8924d2,
title = "Creation and causation",
abstract = "Medieval thinkers regarded it as a foundational tenet of faith that the world had come to be through divine agency. The three monotheist Scriptures testify to this in clear terms, and each of the attendant theologies also came to regard it as important that God be recognized as creator. But how is God’s creative act to be understood? does it correspond to some recognized category of change, either straightforwardly or by analogy? Are the facts of creation and its salient characteristics susceptible to rational analysis and demonstration, or do they fall outside those phenomena that it is the business of philosophy to investigate? And what might the connection, or lack thereof, tell us about either creation or causation? After lengthy deliberations. At the same time, medieval philosophers also inherited the dominant philosophical view that the sensible world has always existed, a sempiternal beneficiary of an eternal agency. The compatibility of these two positions was considered problematic early on, and gave rise to an extensive debate over the eternity of the world. Because eternity was closely linked with self-sufficiency in the philosophical tradition, the idea that there might be other eternal principles besides God prompted questions about the necessity and contingency of the current world order and the different ways in which causal dependency might be construed.",
author = "Kukkonen, {Kalle Taneli}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.019",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521762168",
volume = "1",
pages = "232--246",
booktitle = "The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Creation and causation

AU - Kukkonen, Kalle Taneli

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Medieval thinkers regarded it as a foundational tenet of faith that the world had come to be through divine agency. The three monotheist Scriptures testify to this in clear terms, and each of the attendant theologies also came to regard it as important that God be recognized as creator. But how is God’s creative act to be understood? does it correspond to some recognized category of change, either straightforwardly or by analogy? Are the facts of creation and its salient characteristics susceptible to rational analysis and demonstration, or do they fall outside those phenomena that it is the business of philosophy to investigate? And what might the connection, or lack thereof, tell us about either creation or causation? After lengthy deliberations. At the same time, medieval philosophers also inherited the dominant philosophical view that the sensible world has always existed, a sempiternal beneficiary of an eternal agency. The compatibility of these two positions was considered problematic early on, and gave rise to an extensive debate over the eternity of the world. Because eternity was closely linked with self-sufficiency in the philosophical tradition, the idea that there might be other eternal principles besides God prompted questions about the necessity and contingency of the current world order and the different ways in which causal dependency might be construed.

AB - Medieval thinkers regarded it as a foundational tenet of faith that the world had come to be through divine agency. The three monotheist Scriptures testify to this in clear terms, and each of the attendant theologies also came to regard it as important that God be recognized as creator. But how is God’s creative act to be understood? does it correspond to some recognized category of change, either straightforwardly or by analogy? Are the facts of creation and its salient characteristics susceptible to rational analysis and demonstration, or do they fall outside those phenomena that it is the business of philosophy to investigate? And what might the connection, or lack thereof, tell us about either creation or causation? After lengthy deliberations. At the same time, medieval philosophers also inherited the dominant philosophical view that the sensible world has always existed, a sempiternal beneficiary of an eternal agency. The compatibility of these two positions was considered problematic early on, and gave rise to an extensive debate over the eternity of the world. Because eternity was closely linked with self-sufficiency in the philosophical tradition, the idea that there might be other eternal principles besides God prompted questions about the necessity and contingency of the current world order and the different ways in which causal dependency might be construed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876154989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876154989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.019

DO - 10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.019

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84876154989

SN - 9780521762168

VL - 1

SP - 232

EP - 246

BT - The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -