CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

CPT invariance and the spin-statistics connection are typically taken to be essential properties in relativistic quantum field theories (RQFTs), insofar as the CPT and Spin-Statistics theorems entail that any state of a physical system characterized by an RQFT must possess these properties. Moreover, in the physics literature, they are typically taken to be properties of particles. But there is a Received View among philosophers that RQFTs cannot fundamentally be about particles. This essay considers what proofs of the CPT and Spin-Statistics theorems suggest about the ontology of RQFTs, and the extent to which this is compatible with the Received View. I will argue that such proofs suggest the Received View's approach to ontology is flawed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)797-821
Number of pages25
JournalErkenntnis
Volume78
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Quantum Field Theory
Invariance
Ontology
Statistics
Theorem
Physics
Particle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Logic

Cite this

CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories. / Bain, Jonathan.

In: Erkenntnis, Vol. 78, No. 4, 08.2013, p. 797-821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{600b26281f05496b9d1b6f8d0596845a,
title = "CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories",
abstract = "CPT invariance and the spin-statistics connection are typically taken to be essential properties in relativistic quantum field theories (RQFTs), insofar as the CPT and Spin-Statistics theorems entail that any state of a physical system characterized by an RQFT must possess these properties. Moreover, in the physics literature, they are typically taken to be properties of particles. But there is a Received View among philosophers that RQFTs cannot fundamentally be about particles. This essay considers what proofs of the CPT and Spin-Statistics theorems suggest about the ontology of RQFTs, and the extent to which this is compatible with the Received View. I will argue that such proofs suggest the Received View's approach to ontology is flawed.",
author = "Jonathan Bain",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s10670-011-9324-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "797--821",
journal = "Erkenntnis",
issn = "0165-0106",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories

AU - Bain, Jonathan

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - CPT invariance and the spin-statistics connection are typically taken to be essential properties in relativistic quantum field theories (RQFTs), insofar as the CPT and Spin-Statistics theorems entail that any state of a physical system characterized by an RQFT must possess these properties. Moreover, in the physics literature, they are typically taken to be properties of particles. But there is a Received View among philosophers that RQFTs cannot fundamentally be about particles. This essay considers what proofs of the CPT and Spin-Statistics theorems suggest about the ontology of RQFTs, and the extent to which this is compatible with the Received View. I will argue that such proofs suggest the Received View's approach to ontology is flawed.

AB - CPT invariance and the spin-statistics connection are typically taken to be essential properties in relativistic quantum field theories (RQFTs), insofar as the CPT and Spin-Statistics theorems entail that any state of a physical system characterized by an RQFT must possess these properties. Moreover, in the physics literature, they are typically taken to be properties of particles. But there is a Received View among philosophers that RQFTs cannot fundamentally be about particles. This essay considers what proofs of the CPT and Spin-Statistics theorems suggest about the ontology of RQFTs, and the extent to which this is compatible with the Received View. I will argue that such proofs suggest the Received View's approach to ontology is flawed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883791810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883791810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10670-011-9324-9

DO - 10.1007/s10670-011-9324-9

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 797

EP - 821

JO - Erkenntnis

JF - Erkenntnis

SN - 0165-0106

IS - 4

ER -