Counteracting the boomerang: The effects of choice on compliance to threats and promises

Madeline Heilman, Katherine A. Garner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

96 high school girls participated in an experiment designed to test the hypothesis that previously observed differences in compliance rates to threats and promises are based on the inherent restrictiveness of threats and their curtailment of the recipient's autonomy and freedom of choice. Ss received an influence message, presumably written by a coworker, which was a threat or a promise phrased in either a prescriptive or proscriptive form. In addition, the message indicated that the S would or would not be able to choose among alternative ways of complying. Results show that (a) threats produced more compliance when the option to choose among alternative compliance modes was openly extended than when it was not, and (b) differences in compliance rates to threats and promises were far greater when choice options were not made available than when they were made available. No differences in compliance emerged between prescriptive and proscriptive influence attempts-whether threat or promise. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)911-917
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1975

Fingerprint

Compliance
threat
girls' school
decision making leeway
co-worker
recipient
autonomy
experiment

Keywords

  • curtailment of recipient's autonomy &
  • freedom of choice, compliance to threats &
  • promises, female high school students
  • threat restrictiveness &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Counteracting the boomerang : The effects of choice on compliance to threats and promises. / Heilman, Madeline; Garner, Katherine A.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 5, 05.1975, p. 911-917.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e6e53d164b64ceda789b218911e81b7,
title = "Counteracting the boomerang: The effects of choice on compliance to threats and promises",
abstract = "96 high school girls participated in an experiment designed to test the hypothesis that previously observed differences in compliance rates to threats and promises are based on the inherent restrictiveness of threats and their curtailment of the recipient's autonomy and freedom of choice. Ss received an influence message, presumably written by a coworker, which was a threat or a promise phrased in either a prescriptive or proscriptive form. In addition, the message indicated that the S would or would not be able to choose among alternative ways of complying. Results show that (a) threats produced more compliance when the option to choose among alternative compliance modes was openly extended than when it was not, and (b) differences in compliance rates to threats and promises were far greater when choice options were not made available than when they were made available. No differences in compliance emerged between prescriptive and proscriptive influence attempts-whether threat or promise. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "curtailment of recipient's autonomy &, freedom of choice, compliance to threats &, promises, female high school students, threat restrictiveness &",
author = "Madeline Heilman and Garner, {Katherine A.}",
year = "1975",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/h0076788",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "911--917",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Counteracting the boomerang

T2 - The effects of choice on compliance to threats and promises

AU - Heilman, Madeline

AU - Garner, Katherine A.

PY - 1975/5

Y1 - 1975/5

N2 - 96 high school girls participated in an experiment designed to test the hypothesis that previously observed differences in compliance rates to threats and promises are based on the inherent restrictiveness of threats and their curtailment of the recipient's autonomy and freedom of choice. Ss received an influence message, presumably written by a coworker, which was a threat or a promise phrased in either a prescriptive or proscriptive form. In addition, the message indicated that the S would or would not be able to choose among alternative ways of complying. Results show that (a) threats produced more compliance when the option to choose among alternative compliance modes was openly extended than when it was not, and (b) differences in compliance rates to threats and promises were far greater when choice options were not made available than when they were made available. No differences in compliance emerged between prescriptive and proscriptive influence attempts-whether threat or promise. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - 96 high school girls participated in an experiment designed to test the hypothesis that previously observed differences in compliance rates to threats and promises are based on the inherent restrictiveness of threats and their curtailment of the recipient's autonomy and freedom of choice. Ss received an influence message, presumably written by a coworker, which was a threat or a promise phrased in either a prescriptive or proscriptive form. In addition, the message indicated that the S would or would not be able to choose among alternative ways of complying. Results show that (a) threats produced more compliance when the option to choose among alternative compliance modes was openly extended than when it was not, and (b) differences in compliance rates to threats and promises were far greater when choice options were not made available than when they were made available. No differences in compliance emerged between prescriptive and proscriptive influence attempts-whether threat or promise. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - curtailment of recipient's autonomy &

KW - freedom of choice, compliance to threats &

KW - promises, female high school students

KW - threat restrictiveness &

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041105740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041105740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0076788

DO - 10.1037/h0076788

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041105740

VL - 31

SP - 911

EP - 917

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -