Corrigendum: Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective (Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, (2019), 13, 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213)

Stephen Waite, Arkadij Grigorian, Robert G. Alexander, Stephen L. Macknik, Marisa Carrasco-Queijeiro, David Heeger, Susana Martinez-Conde

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In the original article, there was a mistake in the caption for Figure 5. The caption incorrectly states that the figure was from Reed et al. (2011) however the figure was reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. The correct legend appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Figure 5. Reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. Two different experience groups—expert radiologists and psychology students—searched for lung nodules from CXR images using the flash-preview moving window (FPMW) paradigm. Participants looked at the target word for 15 s (“lung nodule”). They then saw a fixation cross for 200ms, then either a mask preview (random array of colored pixels) or a CXR (a ‘scene’ preview) for 250ms. Next, participants saw a mask for 50ms and then a second fixation cross for 400ms. Following a second presentation of the fixation cross, they conducted a windowed search, with a 2.5-degree radius window restricting the field of view (Litchfield and Donovan, 2016).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number272
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 2019

Fingerprint

Neurosciences
Masks
Radiology
Lung
Psychology
corrigendum
Radiologists

Keywords

  • attention
  • expertise
  • gist
  • holistic processing
  • perceptual learning
  • radiology
  • visual perception
  • visual search

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Corrigendum : Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective (Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, (2019), 13, 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213). / Waite, Stephen; Grigorian, Arkadij; Alexander, Robert G.; Macknik, Stephen L.; Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa; Heeger, David; Martinez-Conde, Susana.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 13, 272, 13.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Waite, Stephen ; Grigorian, Arkadij ; Alexander, Robert G. ; Macknik, Stephen L. ; Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa ; Heeger, David ; Martinez-Conde, Susana. / Corrigendum : Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective (Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, (2019), 13, 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213). In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019 ; Vol. 13.
@article{f13c489a58d74b95a4d78d8334b5ddd3,
title = "Corrigendum: Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective (Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, (2019), 13, 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213)",
abstract = "In the original article, there was a mistake in the caption for Figure 5. The caption incorrectly states that the figure was from Reed et al. (2011) however the figure was reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. The correct legend appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Figure 5. Reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. Two different experience groups—expert radiologists and psychology students—searched for lung nodules from CXR images using the flash-preview moving window (FPMW) paradigm. Participants looked at the target word for 15 s (“lung nodule”). They then saw a fixation cross for 200ms, then either a mask preview (random array of colored pixels) or a CXR (a ‘scene’ preview) for 250ms. Next, participants saw a mask for 50ms and then a second fixation cross for 400ms. Following a second presentation of the fixation cross, they conducted a windowed search, with a 2.5-degree radius window restricting the field of view (Litchfield and Donovan, 2016).",
keywords = "attention, expertise, gist, holistic processing, perceptual learning, radiology, visual perception, visual search",
author = "Stephen Waite and Arkadij Grigorian and Alexander, {Robert G.} and Macknik, {Stephen L.} and Marisa Carrasco-Queijeiro and David Heeger and Susana Martinez-Conde",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2019.00272",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum

T2 - Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective (Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, (2019), 13, 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213)

AU - Waite, Stephen

AU - Grigorian, Arkadij

AU - Alexander, Robert G.

AU - Macknik, Stephen L.

AU - Carrasco-Queijeiro, Marisa

AU - Heeger, David

AU - Martinez-Conde, Susana

PY - 2019/8/13

Y1 - 2019/8/13

N2 - In the original article, there was a mistake in the caption for Figure 5. The caption incorrectly states that the figure was from Reed et al. (2011) however the figure was reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. The correct legend appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Figure 5. Reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. Two different experience groups—expert radiologists and psychology students—searched for lung nodules from CXR images using the flash-preview moving window (FPMW) paradigm. Participants looked at the target word for 15 s (“lung nodule”). They then saw a fixation cross for 200ms, then either a mask preview (random array of colored pixels) or a CXR (a ‘scene’ preview) for 250ms. Next, participants saw a mask for 50ms and then a second fixation cross for 400ms. Following a second presentation of the fixation cross, they conducted a windowed search, with a 2.5-degree radius window restricting the field of view (Litchfield and Donovan, 2016).

AB - In the original article, there was a mistake in the caption for Figure 5. The caption incorrectly states that the figure was from Reed et al. (2011) however the figure was reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. The correct legend appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Figure 5. Reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. Two different experience groups—expert radiologists and psychology students—searched for lung nodules from CXR images using the flash-preview moving window (FPMW) paradigm. Participants looked at the target word for 15 s (“lung nodule”). They then saw a fixation cross for 200ms, then either a mask preview (random array of colored pixels) or a CXR (a ‘scene’ preview) for 250ms. Next, participants saw a mask for 50ms and then a second fixation cross for 400ms. Following a second presentation of the fixation cross, they conducted a windowed search, with a 2.5-degree radius window restricting the field of view (Litchfield and Donovan, 2016).

KW - attention

KW - expertise

KW - gist

KW - holistic processing

KW - perceptual learning

KW - radiology

KW - visual perception

KW - visual search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072733494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072733494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00272

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00272

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85072733494

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

M1 - 272

ER -