Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension

Maria LaRusso, Ha Yeon Kim, Robert Selman, Paola Uccelli, Theo Dawson, Stephanie Jones, Suzanne Donovan, Catherine Snow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Deep reading comprehension refers to the process required to succeed at tasks defined by the Common Core State Literacy Standards, as well as to achieve proficiency on the more challenging reading tasks in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) framework. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that three skill domains not frequently attended to in instruction or in theories of reading comprehension—academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning—predict outcomes on an assessment of deep reading comprehension. The Global Integrated Scenario-based Assessment (GISA; O'Reilly, Weeks, Sabatini, Halderman, & Steinberg, 2014) is designed to reflect students' abilities to evaluate texts, integrate information from an array of texts, and use textual evidence to formulate a position, all features of deep reading comprehension. We tested the role of academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning in explaining variance in end-of-year GISA scores, controlling for beginning-of-year scores and student demographics. All three predictors explained small, but significant, amounts of additional variance. We suggest that these three skill domains deserve greater attention in theories of reading comprehension and in instruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-222
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2016

Fingerprint

comprehension
language
instruction
PISA study
student
literacy
scenario
ability
evidence

Keywords

  • academic language
  • perspective taking
  • reading comprehension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension. / LaRusso, Maria; Kim, Ha Yeon; Selman, Robert; Uccelli, Paola; Dawson, Theo; Jones, Stephanie; Donovan, Suzanne; Snow, Catherine.

In: Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, Vol. 9, No. 2, 02.04.2016, p. 201-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LaRusso, Maria ; Kim, Ha Yeon ; Selman, Robert ; Uccelli, Paola ; Dawson, Theo ; Jones, Stephanie ; Donovan, Suzanne ; Snow, Catherine. / Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension. In: Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 201-222.
@article{e6d71a4217024ad09e8ff26755b243ca,
title = "Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension",
abstract = "ABSTRACT: Deep reading comprehension refers to the process required to succeed at tasks defined by the Common Core State Literacy Standards, as well as to achieve proficiency on the more challenging reading tasks in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) framework. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that three skill domains not frequently attended to in instruction or in theories of reading comprehension—academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning—predict outcomes on an assessment of deep reading comprehension. The Global Integrated Scenario-based Assessment (GISA; O'Reilly, Weeks, Sabatini, Halderman, & Steinberg, 2014) is designed to reflect students' abilities to evaluate texts, integrate information from an array of texts, and use textual evidence to formulate a position, all features of deep reading comprehension. We tested the role of academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning in explaining variance in end-of-year GISA scores, controlling for beginning-of-year scores and student demographics. All three predictors explained small, but significant, amounts of additional variance. We suggest that these three skill domains deserve greater attention in theories of reading comprehension and in instruction.",
keywords = "academic language, perspective taking, reading comprehension",
author = "Maria LaRusso and Kim, {Ha Yeon} and Robert Selman and Paola Uccelli and Theo Dawson and Stephanie Jones and Suzanne Donovan and Catherine Snow",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/19345747.2015.1116035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "201--222",
journal = "Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness",
issn = "1934-5747",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension

AU - LaRusso, Maria

AU - Kim, Ha Yeon

AU - Selman, Robert

AU - Uccelli, Paola

AU - Dawson, Theo

AU - Jones, Stephanie

AU - Donovan, Suzanne

AU - Snow, Catherine

PY - 2016/4/2

Y1 - 2016/4/2

N2 - ABSTRACT: Deep reading comprehension refers to the process required to succeed at tasks defined by the Common Core State Literacy Standards, as well as to achieve proficiency on the more challenging reading tasks in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) framework. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that three skill domains not frequently attended to in instruction or in theories of reading comprehension—academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning—predict outcomes on an assessment of deep reading comprehension. The Global Integrated Scenario-based Assessment (GISA; O'Reilly, Weeks, Sabatini, Halderman, & Steinberg, 2014) is designed to reflect students' abilities to evaluate texts, integrate information from an array of texts, and use textual evidence to formulate a position, all features of deep reading comprehension. We tested the role of academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning in explaining variance in end-of-year GISA scores, controlling for beginning-of-year scores and student demographics. All three predictors explained small, but significant, amounts of additional variance. We suggest that these three skill domains deserve greater attention in theories of reading comprehension and in instruction.

AB - ABSTRACT: Deep reading comprehension refers to the process required to succeed at tasks defined by the Common Core State Literacy Standards, as well as to achieve proficiency on the more challenging reading tasks in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) framework. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that three skill domains not frequently attended to in instruction or in theories of reading comprehension—academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning—predict outcomes on an assessment of deep reading comprehension. The Global Integrated Scenario-based Assessment (GISA; O'Reilly, Weeks, Sabatini, Halderman, & Steinberg, 2014) is designed to reflect students' abilities to evaluate texts, integrate information from an array of texts, and use textual evidence to formulate a position, all features of deep reading comprehension. We tested the role of academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning in explaining variance in end-of-year GISA scores, controlling for beginning-of-year scores and student demographics. All three predictors explained small, but significant, amounts of additional variance. We suggest that these three skill domains deserve greater attention in theories of reading comprehension and in instruction.

KW - academic language

KW - perspective taking

KW - reading comprehension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962052419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962052419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19345747.2015.1116035

DO - 10.1080/19345747.2015.1116035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962052419

VL - 9

SP - 201

EP - 222

JO - Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

JF - Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

SN - 1934-5747

IS - 2

ER -