Contrast sensitivity is enhanced at cued and impaired at uncued locations

Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Spatial covert attention can be voluntarily and involuntarily allocated to select information in a specific area of the visual field in the absence of eye movements. We know that covert attention increases contrast sensitivity at the cued location. What we do not know is how contrast sensitivity is affected at the unattended locations. Generally the fate of stimulus processing outside the focus of attention has been explored using concurrent tasks. In this study, we explored whether a transient peripheral cue affects contrast sensitivity at both cued and uncued locations, in the absence of a concurrent task. Five observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task (target tilted 4 to the left or to the right). An adaptive staircase procedure (QUEST) was used to assess contrast thresholds. In the neutral trials a cue announced the display onset but not the target location. In the experimental trials, a dot appeared briefly above one of two Gabor patches (with spatial frequency of 1, 2, 4 or 8 cpd), which were simultaneously presented for 100 ms on opposite sides of the horizontal meridian at 4 of eccentricity. A post-stimulus arrow was presented to the observer for 300 ms to indicate the Gabor patch to be discriminated. When the cue and the post-stimulus response arrow locations matched, a contrast threshold was computed for the cued location (valid trial); when they did not match the contrast threshold was computed for the uncued location (invalid trial). For all observers, directing covert attention enhanced contrast sensitivity at the cued location compared to the neutral trials; interestingly, contrast sensitivity was impaired by a similar magnitude at the opposite, uncued location.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume3
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Contrast Sensitivity
Cues
Meridians
Eye Movements
Visual Fields

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Contrast sensitivity is enhanced at cued and impaired at uncued locations. / Pestilli, Franco; Carrasco, Marisa.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 3, No. 9, 2003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pestilli, Franco ; Carrasco, Marisa. / Contrast sensitivity is enhanced at cued and impaired at uncued locations. In: Journal of Vision. 2003 ; Vol. 3, No. 9.
@article{c7c9a9fcdaf44eaf9ea0b0613faf338c,
title = "Contrast sensitivity is enhanced at cued and impaired at uncued locations",
abstract = "Spatial covert attention can be voluntarily and involuntarily allocated to select information in a specific area of the visual field in the absence of eye movements. We know that covert attention increases contrast sensitivity at the cued location. What we do not know is how contrast sensitivity is affected at the unattended locations. Generally the fate of stimulus processing outside the focus of attention has been explored using concurrent tasks. In this study, we explored whether a transient peripheral cue affects contrast sensitivity at both cued and uncued locations, in the absence of a concurrent task. Five observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task (target tilted 4 to the left or to the right). An adaptive staircase procedure (QUEST) was used to assess contrast thresholds. In the neutral trials a cue announced the display onset but not the target location. In the experimental trials, a dot appeared briefly above one of two Gabor patches (with spatial frequency of 1, 2, 4 or 8 cpd), which were simultaneously presented for 100 ms on opposite sides of the horizontal meridian at 4 of eccentricity. A post-stimulus arrow was presented to the observer for 300 ms to indicate the Gabor patch to be discriminated. When the cue and the post-stimulus response arrow locations matched, a contrast threshold was computed for the cued location (valid trial); when they did not match the contrast threshold was computed for the uncued location (invalid trial). For all observers, directing covert attention enhanced contrast sensitivity at the cued location compared to the neutral trials; interestingly, contrast sensitivity was impaired by a similar magnitude at the opposite, uncued location.",
author = "Franco Pestilli and Marisa Carrasco",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1167/3.9.862",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast sensitivity is enhanced at cued and impaired at uncued locations

AU - Pestilli, Franco

AU - Carrasco, Marisa

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Spatial covert attention can be voluntarily and involuntarily allocated to select information in a specific area of the visual field in the absence of eye movements. We know that covert attention increases contrast sensitivity at the cued location. What we do not know is how contrast sensitivity is affected at the unattended locations. Generally the fate of stimulus processing outside the focus of attention has been explored using concurrent tasks. In this study, we explored whether a transient peripheral cue affects contrast sensitivity at both cued and uncued locations, in the absence of a concurrent task. Five observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task (target tilted 4 to the left or to the right). An adaptive staircase procedure (QUEST) was used to assess contrast thresholds. In the neutral trials a cue announced the display onset but not the target location. In the experimental trials, a dot appeared briefly above one of two Gabor patches (with spatial frequency of 1, 2, 4 or 8 cpd), which were simultaneously presented for 100 ms on opposite sides of the horizontal meridian at 4 of eccentricity. A post-stimulus arrow was presented to the observer for 300 ms to indicate the Gabor patch to be discriminated. When the cue and the post-stimulus response arrow locations matched, a contrast threshold was computed for the cued location (valid trial); when they did not match the contrast threshold was computed for the uncued location (invalid trial). For all observers, directing covert attention enhanced contrast sensitivity at the cued location compared to the neutral trials; interestingly, contrast sensitivity was impaired by a similar magnitude at the opposite, uncued location.

AB - Spatial covert attention can be voluntarily and involuntarily allocated to select information in a specific area of the visual field in the absence of eye movements. We know that covert attention increases contrast sensitivity at the cued location. What we do not know is how contrast sensitivity is affected at the unattended locations. Generally the fate of stimulus processing outside the focus of attention has been explored using concurrent tasks. In this study, we explored whether a transient peripheral cue affects contrast sensitivity at both cued and uncued locations, in the absence of a concurrent task. Five observers performed a 2AFC orientation discrimination task (target tilted 4 to the left or to the right). An adaptive staircase procedure (QUEST) was used to assess contrast thresholds. In the neutral trials a cue announced the display onset but not the target location. In the experimental trials, a dot appeared briefly above one of two Gabor patches (with spatial frequency of 1, 2, 4 or 8 cpd), which were simultaneously presented for 100 ms on opposite sides of the horizontal meridian at 4 of eccentricity. A post-stimulus arrow was presented to the observer for 300 ms to indicate the Gabor patch to be discriminated. When the cue and the post-stimulus response arrow locations matched, a contrast threshold was computed for the cued location (valid trial); when they did not match the contrast threshold was computed for the uncued location (invalid trial). For all observers, directing covert attention enhanced contrast sensitivity at the cued location compared to the neutral trials; interestingly, contrast sensitivity was impaired by a similar magnitude at the opposite, uncued location.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243098382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243098382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/3.9.862

DO - 10.1167/3.9.862

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 9

ER -