Contrast sensitivity and vernier acuity in amblyopic monkeys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Human psychophysical studies suggest that strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes may have characteristically different patterns of visual loss. In particular, anisometropic amblyopes often show deficits on spatial localization tasks that scale with their spatial resolution losses, whereas strabismic amblyopes can show localization deficits that are large relative to their losses in spatial resolution. We have compared the performance of non-human primates with experimentally-induced anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia on contrast detection and vernier acuity tasks. The performance of both groups of animals was fundamentally similar: both strabismic and anisometropic monkeys showed deficits in spatial localization that were large relative to their resolution losses, although the animals with the most disproportionate losses were strabismic. We investigated the extent to which contrast sensitivity losses accounted for the vernier acuity deficits. The results showed that, in most cases of either strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia, when the vernier stimuli for each eye were equated in terms of effective contrast, the extent of the vernier acuity deficit was reduced to approximately the extent of the spatial resolution deficit. In two cases, both of strabismic amblyopia, we found that equating the stimuli in this way was not sufficient to make the deficits equal, a pattern that has been described for human strabismic amblyopes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2301-2311
Number of pages11
JournalVision Research
Volume33
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Contrast Sensitivity
Amblyopia
Haplorhini
Primates

Keywords

  • Amblyopia
  • Anisometropia
  • Contrast sensitivity
  • Strabismus
  • Vernier acuity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Contrast sensitivity and vernier acuity in amblyopic monkeys. / Kiorpes, Lynne; Kiper, Daniel C.; Movshon, J. Anthony.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 33, No. 16, 1993, p. 2301-2311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a26ea440d2d64298b173b529d580bfe7,
title = "Contrast sensitivity and vernier acuity in amblyopic monkeys",
abstract = "Human psychophysical studies suggest that strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes may have characteristically different patterns of visual loss. In particular, anisometropic amblyopes often show deficits on spatial localization tasks that scale with their spatial resolution losses, whereas strabismic amblyopes can show localization deficits that are large relative to their losses in spatial resolution. We have compared the performance of non-human primates with experimentally-induced anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia on contrast detection and vernier acuity tasks. The performance of both groups of animals was fundamentally similar: both strabismic and anisometropic monkeys showed deficits in spatial localization that were large relative to their resolution losses, although the animals with the most disproportionate losses were strabismic. We investigated the extent to which contrast sensitivity losses accounted for the vernier acuity deficits. The results showed that, in most cases of either strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia, when the vernier stimuli for each eye were equated in terms of effective contrast, the extent of the vernier acuity deficit was reduced to approximately the extent of the spatial resolution deficit. In two cases, both of strabismic amblyopia, we found that equating the stimuli in this way was not sufficient to make the deficits equal, a pattern that has been described for human strabismic amblyopes.",
keywords = "Amblyopia, Anisometropia, Contrast sensitivity, Strabismus, Vernier acuity",
author = "Lynne Kiorpes and Kiper, {Daniel C.} and Movshon, {J. Anthony}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(93)90107-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "2301--2311",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast sensitivity and vernier acuity in amblyopic monkeys

AU - Kiorpes, Lynne

AU - Kiper, Daniel C.

AU - Movshon, J. Anthony

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Human psychophysical studies suggest that strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes may have characteristically different patterns of visual loss. In particular, anisometropic amblyopes often show deficits on spatial localization tasks that scale with their spatial resolution losses, whereas strabismic amblyopes can show localization deficits that are large relative to their losses in spatial resolution. We have compared the performance of non-human primates with experimentally-induced anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia on contrast detection and vernier acuity tasks. The performance of both groups of animals was fundamentally similar: both strabismic and anisometropic monkeys showed deficits in spatial localization that were large relative to their resolution losses, although the animals with the most disproportionate losses were strabismic. We investigated the extent to which contrast sensitivity losses accounted for the vernier acuity deficits. The results showed that, in most cases of either strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia, when the vernier stimuli for each eye were equated in terms of effective contrast, the extent of the vernier acuity deficit was reduced to approximately the extent of the spatial resolution deficit. In two cases, both of strabismic amblyopia, we found that equating the stimuli in this way was not sufficient to make the deficits equal, a pattern that has been described for human strabismic amblyopes.

AB - Human psychophysical studies suggest that strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes may have characteristically different patterns of visual loss. In particular, anisometropic amblyopes often show deficits on spatial localization tasks that scale with their spatial resolution losses, whereas strabismic amblyopes can show localization deficits that are large relative to their losses in spatial resolution. We have compared the performance of non-human primates with experimentally-induced anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia on contrast detection and vernier acuity tasks. The performance of both groups of animals was fundamentally similar: both strabismic and anisometropic monkeys showed deficits in spatial localization that were large relative to their resolution losses, although the animals with the most disproportionate losses were strabismic. We investigated the extent to which contrast sensitivity losses accounted for the vernier acuity deficits. The results showed that, in most cases of either strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia, when the vernier stimuli for each eye were equated in terms of effective contrast, the extent of the vernier acuity deficit was reduced to approximately the extent of the spatial resolution deficit. In two cases, both of strabismic amblyopia, we found that equating the stimuli in this way was not sufficient to make the deficits equal, a pattern that has been described for human strabismic amblyopes.

KW - Amblyopia

KW - Anisometropia

KW - Contrast sensitivity

KW - Strabismus

KW - Vernier acuity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027218445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027218445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90107-8

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90107-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 8273294

AN - SCOPUS:0027218445

VL - 33

SP - 2301

EP - 2311

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 16

ER -