Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound: Do sources agree?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Batavia M. Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound: do sources agree? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1006-12. Objectives To determine the amount of agreement among general rehabilitation sources for both superficial heating and therapeutic ultrasound contraindications. Data sources English-language textbook and peer-reviewed journal sources, from January 1992 to July 2002. Searches of computerized databases (HealthSTAR, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase) as well as Library of Congress Online Catalogs, Books in Print, and AcqWeb's Directory of Publishers and Venders. Data selection Sources were excluded if they (1) were published before 1992, (2) failed to address general rehabilitation audiences, or (3) were identified as a researcher's related publication with similar information on the topic. Data extraction Type and number of contraindications, type of audience, year of publication, number of references, rationales, and alternative treatment strategies. Data synthesis Eighteen superficial heat and 20 ultrasound sources identified anywhere from 5 to 22 and 9 to 36 contraindications/precautions, respectively. Agreement among sources was generally high but ranged from 11% to 95%, with lower agreement noted for pregnancy, metal implants, edema, skin integrity, and cognitive/communicative concerns. Seventy-two percent of superficial heat sources and 25% of ultrasound sources failed to reference at least 1 contraindication claim. Conclusions Agreement among contraindication sources was generally good for both superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound. Sources varied with regard to the number of contraindications, references, and rationales cited. Greater reliance on objective data and standardized classification systems may serve to develop more uniform guidelines for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1006-1012
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume85
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

Hot Temperature
Information Storage and Retrieval
Rehabilitation
Therapeutics
Directories
Textbooks
MEDLINE
Heating
Libraries
Publications
Edema
Language
Metals
Research Personnel
Databases
Guidelines
Pregnancy
Skin

Keywords

  • Heat
  • Rehabilitation
  • Review [publication type]
  • Ultrasonic therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound : Do sources agree? / Batavia, Mitchell.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 85, No. 6, 06.2004, p. 1006-1012.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{c7dd3c3b1c10441eac48f1a8122ae945,
title = "Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound: Do sources agree?",
abstract = "Batavia M. Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound: do sources agree? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1006-12. Objectives To determine the amount of agreement among general rehabilitation sources for both superficial heating and therapeutic ultrasound contraindications. Data sources English-language textbook and peer-reviewed journal sources, from January 1992 to July 2002. Searches of computerized databases (HealthSTAR, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase) as well as Library of Congress Online Catalogs, Books in Print, and AcqWeb's Directory of Publishers and Venders. Data selection Sources were excluded if they (1) were published before 1992, (2) failed to address general rehabilitation audiences, or (3) were identified as a researcher's related publication with similar information on the topic. Data extraction Type and number of contraindications, type of audience, year of publication, number of references, rationales, and alternative treatment strategies. Data synthesis Eighteen superficial heat and 20 ultrasound sources identified anywhere from 5 to 22 and 9 to 36 contraindications/precautions, respectively. Agreement among sources was generally high but ranged from 11{\%} to 95{\%}, with lower agreement noted for pregnancy, metal implants, edema, skin integrity, and cognitive/communicative concerns. Seventy-two percent of superficial heat sources and 25{\%} of ultrasound sources failed to reference at least 1 contraindication claim. Conclusions Agreement among contraindication sources was generally good for both superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound. Sources varied with regard to the number of contraindications, references, and rationales cited. Greater reliance on objective data and standardized classification systems may serve to develop more uniform guidelines for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound.",
keywords = "Heat, Rehabilitation, Review [publication type], Ultrasonic therapy",
author = "Mitchell Batavia",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.092",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1006--1012",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound

T2 - Do sources agree?

AU - Batavia, Mitchell

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Batavia M. Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound: do sources agree? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1006-12. Objectives To determine the amount of agreement among general rehabilitation sources for both superficial heating and therapeutic ultrasound contraindications. Data sources English-language textbook and peer-reviewed journal sources, from January 1992 to July 2002. Searches of computerized databases (HealthSTAR, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase) as well as Library of Congress Online Catalogs, Books in Print, and AcqWeb's Directory of Publishers and Venders. Data selection Sources were excluded if they (1) were published before 1992, (2) failed to address general rehabilitation audiences, or (3) were identified as a researcher's related publication with similar information on the topic. Data extraction Type and number of contraindications, type of audience, year of publication, number of references, rationales, and alternative treatment strategies. Data synthesis Eighteen superficial heat and 20 ultrasound sources identified anywhere from 5 to 22 and 9 to 36 contraindications/precautions, respectively. Agreement among sources was generally high but ranged from 11% to 95%, with lower agreement noted for pregnancy, metal implants, edema, skin integrity, and cognitive/communicative concerns. Seventy-two percent of superficial heat sources and 25% of ultrasound sources failed to reference at least 1 contraindication claim. Conclusions Agreement among contraindication sources was generally good for both superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound. Sources varied with regard to the number of contraindications, references, and rationales cited. Greater reliance on objective data and standardized classification systems may serve to develop more uniform guidelines for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound.

AB - Batavia M. Contraindications for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound: do sources agree? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1006-12. Objectives To determine the amount of agreement among general rehabilitation sources for both superficial heating and therapeutic ultrasound contraindications. Data sources English-language textbook and peer-reviewed journal sources, from January 1992 to July 2002. Searches of computerized databases (HealthSTAR, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase) as well as Library of Congress Online Catalogs, Books in Print, and AcqWeb's Directory of Publishers and Venders. Data selection Sources were excluded if they (1) were published before 1992, (2) failed to address general rehabilitation audiences, or (3) were identified as a researcher's related publication with similar information on the topic. Data extraction Type and number of contraindications, type of audience, year of publication, number of references, rationales, and alternative treatment strategies. Data synthesis Eighteen superficial heat and 20 ultrasound sources identified anywhere from 5 to 22 and 9 to 36 contraindications/precautions, respectively. Agreement among sources was generally high but ranged from 11% to 95%, with lower agreement noted for pregnancy, metal implants, edema, skin integrity, and cognitive/communicative concerns. Seventy-two percent of superficial heat sources and 25% of ultrasound sources failed to reference at least 1 contraindication claim. Conclusions Agreement among contraindication sources was generally good for both superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound. Sources varied with regard to the number of contraindications, references, and rationales cited. Greater reliance on objective data and standardized classification systems may serve to develop more uniform guidelines for superficial heat and therapeutic ultrasound.

KW - Heat

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Review [publication type]

KW - Ultrasonic therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042667802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042667802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.092

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.092

M3 - Review article

VL - 85

SP - 1006

EP - 1012

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 6

ER -