Contextualism in the study of indian intellectual cultures

Jonardon Ganeri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When J. L. Austin introduced two "shining new tools to crack the crib of reality"-the theory of performative utterances and the doctrine of infelicities-he could not have imagined that he was also about to inaugurate a shining new industry in the philosophy of the social sciences. But with its evident concern for the features to which "all acts are heir which have the general character of ritual or ceremonial," Austin's theory soon became indispensable in the analysis of ritual, linguistic and every kind of social action. While Indianists such as Frits Staal, Bimal Matilal and David Seyfort Ruegg have made good use of the work of Austin and his "ordinary language" school, it is Quentin Skinner who has attempted to turn Austin's insights into a general "theory and method" for the study of intellectual cultures. The question I want to address in this paper has to do with the applicability of Skinnerian techniques to the study of literary and intellectual Sanskrit culture in premodern India. If not all of Skinner's methods transfer to the new context, identification of the points at which they breakdown helps to clarify the distinctive contours of Indian intellectual history, and suggests appropriate methodological innovation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-562
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Indian Philosophy
Volume36
Issue number5-6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2008

Fingerprint

religious behavior
history of ideas
doctrine
social science
India
innovation
linguistics
industry
language
school
Contextualism
Heir
Premodern
Industry
General Theory
Social Action
Performative Utterances
Doctrine
Crack
Innovation

Keywords

  • B. K. Matilal
  • Contextualism
  • Definition
  • Intertextual Speech-act
  • Prolepsis
  • Quentin Skinner
  • Śāstra

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Contextualism in the study of indian intellectual cultures. / Ganeri, Jonardon.

In: Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 36, No. 5-6, 01.10.2008, p. 551-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ganeri, Jonardon. / Contextualism in the study of indian intellectual cultures. In: Journal of Indian Philosophy. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 5-6. pp. 551-562.
@article{65eb669292ef45b8be68d68e9f8d4cfd,
title = "Contextualism in the study of indian intellectual cultures",
abstract = "When J. L. Austin introduced two {"}shining new tools to crack the crib of reality{"}-the theory of performative utterances and the doctrine of infelicities-he could not have imagined that he was also about to inaugurate a shining new industry in the philosophy of the social sciences. But with its evident concern for the features to which {"}all acts are heir which have the general character of ritual or ceremonial,{"} Austin's theory soon became indispensable in the analysis of ritual, linguistic and every kind of social action. While Indianists such as Frits Staal, Bimal Matilal and David Seyfort Ruegg have made good use of the work of Austin and his {"}ordinary language{"} school, it is Quentin Skinner who has attempted to turn Austin's insights into a general {"}theory and method{"} for the study of intellectual cultures. The question I want to address in this paper has to do with the applicability of Skinnerian techniques to the study of literary and intellectual Sanskrit culture in premodern India. If not all of Skinner's methods transfer to the new context, identification of the points at which they breakdown helps to clarify the distinctive contours of Indian intellectual history, and suggests appropriate methodological innovation.",
keywords = "B. K. Matilal, Contextualism, Definition, Intertextual Speech-act, Prolepsis, Quentin Skinner, Śāstra",
author = "Jonardon Ganeri",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10781-008-9039-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "551--562",
journal = "Journal of Indian Philosophy",
issn = "0022-1791",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contextualism in the study of indian intellectual cultures

AU - Ganeri, Jonardon

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - When J. L. Austin introduced two "shining new tools to crack the crib of reality"-the theory of performative utterances and the doctrine of infelicities-he could not have imagined that he was also about to inaugurate a shining new industry in the philosophy of the social sciences. But with its evident concern for the features to which "all acts are heir which have the general character of ritual or ceremonial," Austin's theory soon became indispensable in the analysis of ritual, linguistic and every kind of social action. While Indianists such as Frits Staal, Bimal Matilal and David Seyfort Ruegg have made good use of the work of Austin and his "ordinary language" school, it is Quentin Skinner who has attempted to turn Austin's insights into a general "theory and method" for the study of intellectual cultures. The question I want to address in this paper has to do with the applicability of Skinnerian techniques to the study of literary and intellectual Sanskrit culture in premodern India. If not all of Skinner's methods transfer to the new context, identification of the points at which they breakdown helps to clarify the distinctive contours of Indian intellectual history, and suggests appropriate methodological innovation.

AB - When J. L. Austin introduced two "shining new tools to crack the crib of reality"-the theory of performative utterances and the doctrine of infelicities-he could not have imagined that he was also about to inaugurate a shining new industry in the philosophy of the social sciences. But with its evident concern for the features to which "all acts are heir which have the general character of ritual or ceremonial," Austin's theory soon became indispensable in the analysis of ritual, linguistic and every kind of social action. While Indianists such as Frits Staal, Bimal Matilal and David Seyfort Ruegg have made good use of the work of Austin and his "ordinary language" school, it is Quentin Skinner who has attempted to turn Austin's insights into a general "theory and method" for the study of intellectual cultures. The question I want to address in this paper has to do with the applicability of Skinnerian techniques to the study of literary and intellectual Sanskrit culture in premodern India. If not all of Skinner's methods transfer to the new context, identification of the points at which they breakdown helps to clarify the distinctive contours of Indian intellectual history, and suggests appropriate methodological innovation.

KW - B. K. Matilal

KW - Contextualism

KW - Definition

KW - Intertextual Speech-act

KW - Prolepsis

KW - Quentin Skinner

KW - Śāstra

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51349091824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51349091824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10781-008-9039-7

DO - 10.1007/s10781-008-9039-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:51349091824

VL - 36

SP - 551

EP - 562

JO - Journal of Indian Philosophy

JF - Journal of Indian Philosophy

SN - 0022-1791

IS - 5-6

ER -