Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements

Matthew J. Traxler, Brian McElree, Rihana S. Williams, Martin J. Pickering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Four eye-movement monitoring studies examined the processing of expressions argued to require enriched semantic composition (Pustejovsky, 1995). Previous research found that noun phrases denoting entities (e.g., the book) were difficult to process following verbs that require event complements (e.g., begin). Expressions like began the book may be difficult to process because they require complex operations to construct an event sense (e.g., began writing the book), they engender competition between alternative interpretations (cf. began reading the book), or they require a costly retrieval operation to recover a suitable activity (e.g., reading). Introducing the activity before a target expression did not eliminate the processing cost (Experiments 1 and 2), but introducing the entire event sense did (Experiments 3 and 4). These findings are incompatible with accounts that would attribute the observed cost to the retrieval or selection of an implicit activity in the event sense of the expression. They suggest that interpretation is costly when composition requires the on-line construction of a sense not lexically stored or available in the immediate discourse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Coercion
  • Enriched composition
  • Semantics
  • Sentence processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Traxler, M. J., McElree, B., Williams, R. S., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.002