Constructing a Global Law-Violence against Women and the Human Rights System

Sally Merry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This ethnographic analysis of one of the core human rights conventions suggests that despite the lack of enforceability of this convention and its operation within the framework of state sovereignty, it is similar to state law. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, or CEDAW, the major UN convention on the status of women, articulates a vision of women's equal protection from discrimination and addresses gender-based violence as a form of discrimination. It had been ratified by 171 nation states as of mid-2003. Its implementation relies on a complex process of periodic reporting to a global body meeting in New York and a symbiotic if sometimes contentious relationship between government representatives and international and domestic NGOs. Like state law, it serves to articulate and name problems and delineate solutions. It provides a resource for activists endeavoring to address problems of women's status and turns the international gaze on resisting nations, Its regulatory strength depends on the cultural legitimacy of the international process of consensus building and related social movements to define social justice in these terms. Thus, like state law, its impact depends on its cultural legitimacy and its embodiment in local cultures and legal consciousness. This examination of CEDAW as quasi law extends our understanding of law as a plural and a symbolic system rooted in a particular historical moment of globalization.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)941-977
    Number of pages37
    JournalLaw and Social Inquiry
    Volume28
    Issue number4
    StatePublished - Sep 2003

    Fingerprint

    state law
    human rights
    violence
    discrimination
    Law
    legitimacy
    human rights convention
    legal consciousness
    UN Convention
    Social Movements
    social justice
    nation state
    sovereignty
    non-governmental organization
    globalization
    examination
    lack
    gender
    resources

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Cite this

    Constructing a Global Law-Violence against Women and the Human Rights System. / Merry, Sally.

    In: Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 28, No. 4, 09.2003, p. 941-977.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{db1b6fae7f964a11867cc3f4219b684d,
    title = "Constructing a Global Law-Violence against Women and the Human Rights System",
    abstract = "This ethnographic analysis of one of the core human rights conventions suggests that despite the lack of enforceability of this convention and its operation within the framework of state sovereignty, it is similar to state law. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, or CEDAW, the major UN convention on the status of women, articulates a vision of women's equal protection from discrimination and addresses gender-based violence as a form of discrimination. It had been ratified by 171 nation states as of mid-2003. Its implementation relies on a complex process of periodic reporting to a global body meeting in New York and a symbiotic if sometimes contentious relationship between government representatives and international and domestic NGOs. Like state law, it serves to articulate and name problems and delineate solutions. It provides a resource for activists endeavoring to address problems of women's status and turns the international gaze on resisting nations, Its regulatory strength depends on the cultural legitimacy of the international process of consensus building and related social movements to define social justice in these terms. Thus, like state law, its impact depends on its cultural legitimacy and its embodiment in local cultures and legal consciousness. This examination of CEDAW as quasi law extends our understanding of law as a plural and a symbolic system rooted in a particular historical moment of globalization.",
    author = "Sally Merry",
    year = "2003",
    month = "9",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "941--977",
    journal = "Law and Social Inquiry",
    issn = "0897-6546",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Constructing a Global Law-Violence against Women and the Human Rights System

    AU - Merry, Sally

    PY - 2003/9

    Y1 - 2003/9

    N2 - This ethnographic analysis of one of the core human rights conventions suggests that despite the lack of enforceability of this convention and its operation within the framework of state sovereignty, it is similar to state law. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, or CEDAW, the major UN convention on the status of women, articulates a vision of women's equal protection from discrimination and addresses gender-based violence as a form of discrimination. It had been ratified by 171 nation states as of mid-2003. Its implementation relies on a complex process of periodic reporting to a global body meeting in New York and a symbiotic if sometimes contentious relationship between government representatives and international and domestic NGOs. Like state law, it serves to articulate and name problems and delineate solutions. It provides a resource for activists endeavoring to address problems of women's status and turns the international gaze on resisting nations, Its regulatory strength depends on the cultural legitimacy of the international process of consensus building and related social movements to define social justice in these terms. Thus, like state law, its impact depends on its cultural legitimacy and its embodiment in local cultures and legal consciousness. This examination of CEDAW as quasi law extends our understanding of law as a plural and a symbolic system rooted in a particular historical moment of globalization.

    AB - This ethnographic analysis of one of the core human rights conventions suggests that despite the lack of enforceability of this convention and its operation within the framework of state sovereignty, it is similar to state law. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, or CEDAW, the major UN convention on the status of women, articulates a vision of women's equal protection from discrimination and addresses gender-based violence as a form of discrimination. It had been ratified by 171 nation states as of mid-2003. Its implementation relies on a complex process of periodic reporting to a global body meeting in New York and a symbiotic if sometimes contentious relationship between government representatives and international and domestic NGOs. Like state law, it serves to articulate and name problems and delineate solutions. It provides a resource for activists endeavoring to address problems of women's status and turns the international gaze on resisting nations, Its regulatory strength depends on the cultural legitimacy of the international process of consensus building and related social movements to define social justice in these terms. Thus, like state law, its impact depends on its cultural legitimacy and its embodiment in local cultures and legal consciousness. This examination of CEDAW as quasi law extends our understanding of law as a plural and a symbolic system rooted in a particular historical moment of globalization.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842431994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842431994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:1842431994

    VL - 28

    SP - 941

    EP - 977

    JO - Law and Social Inquiry

    JF - Law and Social Inquiry

    SN - 0897-6546

    IS - 4

    ER -