Construct Relevant or Irrelevant? The Role of Linguistic Complexity in the Assessment of English Language Learners’ Science Knowledge

Brianna Avenia-Tapper, Lorena Llosa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of language-related construct-irrelevant variance on content area tests from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. We propose that the construct relevance of language used in content area assessments, and consequent claims of construct-irrelevant variance and bias, should be determined according to the degree of correspondence between language use in the assessment and language use in the educational contexts in which the content is learned and used. This can be accomplished by matching the linguistic features of an assessment and the linguistic features of the domain in which the assessment is measuring achievement. This represents a departure from previous work on the assessment of English language learners’ content knowledge that has assumed complex linguistic features are a source of construct irrelevant variance by virtue of their complexity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-111
Number of pages17
JournalEducational Assessment
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2015

Fingerprint

English language
linguistics
science
language
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Construct Relevant or Irrelevant? The Role of Linguistic Complexity in the Assessment of English Language Learners’ Science Knowledge. / Avenia-Tapper, Brianna; Llosa, Lorena.

In: Educational Assessment, Vol. 20, No. 2, 03.04.2015, p. 95-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7528c14b7e0947c69c88b9aca6dc670e,
title = "Construct Relevant or Irrelevant? The Role of Linguistic Complexity in the Assessment of English Language Learners’ Science Knowledge",
abstract = "This article addresses the issue of language-related construct-irrelevant variance on content area tests from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. We propose that the construct relevance of language used in content area assessments, and consequent claims of construct-irrelevant variance and bias, should be determined according to the degree of correspondence between language use in the assessment and language use in the educational contexts in which the content is learned and used. This can be accomplished by matching the linguistic features of an assessment and the linguistic features of the domain in which the assessment is measuring achievement. This represents a departure from previous work on the assessment of English language learners’ content knowledge that has assumed complex linguistic features are a source of construct irrelevant variance by virtue of their complexity.",
author = "Brianna Avenia-Tapper and Lorena Llosa",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10627197.2015.1028622",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "95--111",
journal = "Educational Assessment",
issn = "1062-7197",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construct Relevant or Irrelevant? The Role of Linguistic Complexity in the Assessment of English Language Learners’ Science Knowledge

AU - Avenia-Tapper, Brianna

AU - Llosa, Lorena

PY - 2015/4/3

Y1 - 2015/4/3

N2 - This article addresses the issue of language-related construct-irrelevant variance on content area tests from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. We propose that the construct relevance of language used in content area assessments, and consequent claims of construct-irrelevant variance and bias, should be determined according to the degree of correspondence between language use in the assessment and language use in the educational contexts in which the content is learned and used. This can be accomplished by matching the linguistic features of an assessment and the linguistic features of the domain in which the assessment is measuring achievement. This represents a departure from previous work on the assessment of English language learners’ content knowledge that has assumed complex linguistic features are a source of construct irrelevant variance by virtue of their complexity.

AB - This article addresses the issue of language-related construct-irrelevant variance on content area tests from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. We propose that the construct relevance of language used in content area assessments, and consequent claims of construct-irrelevant variance and bias, should be determined according to the degree of correspondence between language use in the assessment and language use in the educational contexts in which the content is learned and used. This can be accomplished by matching the linguistic features of an assessment and the linguistic features of the domain in which the assessment is measuring achievement. This represents a departure from previous work on the assessment of English language learners’ content knowledge that has assumed complex linguistic features are a source of construct irrelevant variance by virtue of their complexity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929234889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929234889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10627197.2015.1028622

DO - 10.1080/10627197.2015.1028622

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929234889

VL - 20

SP - 95

EP - 111

JO - Educational Assessment

JF - Educational Assessment

SN - 1062-7197

IS - 2

ER -