Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance

Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person's perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance. Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point-in time, in space, in social distance, and in hypotheticality-constitute different distance dimensions. Transcending the self in the here and now entails mental construal, and the farther removed an object is from direct experience, the higher (more abstract) the level of construal of that object. Supporting this analysis, research shows (a) that the various distances are cognitively related to each other, (b) that they similarly influence and are influenced by level of mental construal, and (c) that they similarly affect prediction, preference, and action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)440-463
Number of pages24
JournalPsychological Review
Volume117
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Psychological Theory
Psychology
Social Distance
Research
Psychological Distance
Construal
Thinking
Transcend

Keywords

  • abstraction
  • mental construal
  • mental travel
  • psychological distance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. / Trope, Yaacov; Liberman, Nira.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 117, No. 2, 04.2010, p. 440-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trope, Yaacov ; Liberman, Nira. / Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. In: Psychological Review. 2010 ; Vol. 117, No. 2. pp. 440-463.
@article{20a834190ecc400794b9f9155544875b,
title = "Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance",
abstract = "People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person's perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance. Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point-in time, in space, in social distance, and in hypotheticality-constitute different distance dimensions. Transcending the self in the here and now entails mental construal, and the farther removed an object is from direct experience, the higher (more abstract) the level of construal of that object. Supporting this analysis, research shows (a) that the various distances are cognitively related to each other, (b) that they similarly influence and are influenced by level of mental construal, and (c) that they similarly affect prediction, preference, and action.",
keywords = "abstraction, mental construal, mental travel, psychological distance",
author = "Yaacov Trope and Nira Liberman",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1037/a0018963",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "440--463",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance

AU - Trope, Yaacov

AU - Liberman, Nira

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person's perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance. Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point-in time, in space, in social distance, and in hypotheticality-constitute different distance dimensions. Transcending the self in the here and now entails mental construal, and the farther removed an object is from direct experience, the higher (more abstract) the level of construal of that object. Supporting this analysis, research shows (a) that the various distances are cognitively related to each other, (b) that they similarly influence and are influenced by level of mental construal, and (c) that they similarly affect prediction, preference, and action.

AB - People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person's perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance. Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point-in time, in space, in social distance, and in hypotheticality-constitute different distance dimensions. Transcending the self in the here and now entails mental construal, and the farther removed an object is from direct experience, the higher (more abstract) the level of construal of that object. Supporting this analysis, research shows (a) that the various distances are cognitively related to each other, (b) that they similarly influence and are influenced by level of mental construal, and (c) that they similarly affect prediction, preference, and action.

KW - abstraction

KW - mental construal

KW - mental travel

KW - psychological distance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953157214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953157214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0018963

DO - 10.1037/a0018963

M3 - Article

C2 - 20438233

AN - SCOPUS:77953157214

VL - 117

SP - 440

EP - 463

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 2

ER -